TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - LISA - a European project for FEM-based limit and shakedown analysis N2 - The load-carrying capacity or the safety against plastic limit states are the central questions in the design of structures and passive components in the apparatus engineering. A precise answer is most simply given by limit and shakedown analysis. These methods can be based on static and kinematic theorems for lower and upper bound analysis. Both may be formulated as optimization problems for finite element discretizations of structures. The problems of large-scale analysis and the extension towards realistic material modelling will be solved in a European research project. Limit and shakedown analyses are briefly demonstrated with illustrative examples. KW - Einspielen KW - Traglast KW - Finite-Elemente-Methode KW - Traglastanalyse KW - Einspielanalyse KW - FEM KW - limit analysis KW - shakedown analysis Y1 - 2001 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Design by Analysis of Pressure Components by non-linear Optimization N2 - This paper presents the direct route to Design by Analysis (DBA) of the new European pressure vessel standard in the language of limit and shakedown analysis (LISA). This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for some examples from the DBA-Manual. One observation from the examples is, that the optimisation approach gives reliable and close lower bound solutions leading to simple and optimised design decision. KW - Analytischer Zulaessigkeitsnachweis KW - FEM KW - Einspiel-Analyse KW - design-by-analysis KW - finite element analysis KW - limit and shakedown analysis Y1 - 2003 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Basis Reduction for the Shakedown Problem for Bounded Kinematic Hardening Material N2 - Limit and shakedown analysis are effective methods for assessing the load carrying capacity of a given structure. The elasto–plastic behavior of the structure subjected to loads varying in a given load domain is characterized by the shakedown load factor, defined as the maximum factor which satisfies the sufficient conditions stated in the corresponding static shakedown theorem. The finite element dicretization of the problem may lead to very large convex optimization. For the effective solution a basis reduction method has been developed that makes use of the special problem structure for perfectly plastic material. The paper proposes a modified basis reduction method for direct application to the two-surface plasticity model of bounded kinematic hardening material. The considered numerical examples show an enlargement of the load carrying capacity due to bounded hardening. KW - Finite-Elemente-Methode KW - Einspielen KW - Basis Reduktion KW - konvexe Optimierung KW - FEM KW - Druckgeräte KW - Basis reduction KW - Convex optimization KW - FEM KW - Shakedown analysis Y1 - 2000 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Shakedown and ratchetting under tension-torsion loadings: analysis and experiments N2 - Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratchetting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratchetting range. The performed experiment comprised a hollow tension specimen which was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with constant moments. First, a series of uniaxial tests has been carried out in order to calibrate a bounded kinematic hardening rule. The load parameters have been selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses with the PERMAS code using a kinematic hardening material model. It is shown that this shakedown analysis gives reasonable agreement between the experimental and the numerical results. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis. KW - Einspielen KW - Einspielen KW - Ratchetting KW - Zug-Druck Belastung KW - shakedown KW - ratchetting KW - tension–torsion loading Y1 - 2003 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Direct finite element route for design-by-analysis of pressure components N2 - In the new European standard for unfired pressure vessels, EN 13445-3, there are two approaches for carrying out a Design-by-Analysis that cover both the stress categorization method (Annex C) and the direct route method (Annex B) for a check against global plastic deformation and against progressive plastic deformation. This paper presents the direct route in the language of limit and shakedown analysis. This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for mechanical and thermal actions. One observation from the examples is that the so-called 3f (3Sm) criterion fails to be a reliable check against progressive plastic deformation. Precise conditions are given, which greatly restrict the applicability of the 3f criterion. KW - Einspielen KW - Plastizität KW - Deformation KW - Analytischer Zulaessigkeitsnachweis KW - Einspiel-Analyse KW - fortschreitende plastische Deformation KW - alternierend Verformbarkeit KW - Einspiel-Kriterium KW - Design-by-analysis KW - Shakedown analysis KW - Progressive plastic deformation KW - Alternating plasticity KW - Shakedown criterion Y1 - 2005 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Local and global collapse pressure of longitudinally flawed pipes and cylindrical vessels N2 - Limit loads can be calculated with the finite element method (FEM) for any component, defect geometry, and loading. FEM suggests that published long crack limit formulae for axial defects under-estimate the burst pressure for internal surface defects in thick pipes while limit loads are not conservative for deep cracks and for pressure loaded crack-faces. Very deep cracks have a residual strength, which is modelled by a global collapse load. These observations are combined to derive new analytical local and global collapse loads. The global collapse loads are close to FEM limit analyses for all crack dimensions. KW - Finite-Elemente-Methode KW - Grenzwertberechnung KW - Axialbelastung KW - FEM KW - Grenzwertberechnung KW - Axialbelastung KW - Traglastanalyse KW - Limit analysis KW - Global and local collapse KW - Axially cracked pipe KW - Pressure loaded crack-face Y1 - 2005 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Cyclic plastic deformation tests to verify FEM-based shakedown analyses N2 - Fatigue analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying that thermal ratcheting is limited. To this end it is important to make a clear distintion between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range (continuing deformation). As part of an EU-supported research project, experiments were carried out using a 4-bar model. The experiment comprised a water-cooled internal tube, and three insulated heatable outer test bars. The system was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with alternating temperatures at the outer bars. The test parameters were partly selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses. During the test, temperatures and strains were measured as a function of time. The loads and the resulting stresses were confirmed on an ongoing basis during performance of the test, and after it. Different material models were applied for this incremental elasto-plastic analysis using the ANSYS program. The results of the simulation are used to verify the FEM-based shakedown analysis. KW - Materialermüdung KW - Einspielen KW - Materialermüdung KW - shakedown analyses KW - thermal ratcheting KW - fatigue analyses Y1 - 2001 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Plastic collapse analysis of longitudinally flawed pipes and vessels N2 - Improved collapse loads of thick-walled, crack containing pipes and vessels are suggested. Very deep cracks have a residual strength which is better modelled by a global limit load. In all burst tests, the ductility of pressure vessel steels was sufficiently high whereby the burst pressure could be predicted by limit analysis with no need to apply fracture mechanics. The relative prognosis error increases however, for long and deep defects due to uncertainties of geometry and strength data. KW - Druckbehälter KW - Stahl KW - Druckbelastung KW - Druckbeanspruchung KW - Rohr KW - Rohrbruch KW - Druckbehälter KW - Stahl KW - Druckbelastung KW - Druckbeanspruchung KW - Rohrbruch KW - Fehlerstellen KW - pipes KW - vessels KW - load limit KW - burst tests KW - burst pressure KW - flaw Y1 - 2004 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Staat, Manfred A1 - Heitzer, Michael T1 - Direct static FEM approach to limit and shakedown analysis N2 - Safety and reliability of structures may be assessed indirectly by stress distributions. Limit and shakedown theorems are simplified but exact methods of plasticity that provide safety factors directly in the loading space. These theorems may be used for a direct definition of the limit state function for failure by plastic collapse or by inadaptation. In a FEM formulation the limit state function is obtained from a nonlinear optimization problem. This direct approach reduces considerably the necessary knowledge of uncertain technological input data, the computing time, and the numerical error. Moreover, the direct way leads to highly effective and precise reliability analyses. The theorems are implemented into a general purpose FEM program in a way capable of large-scale analysis. KW - Einspielen KW - Nichtlineare Optimierung KW - Shakedown KW - Shakedown KW - limit load KW - lower bound theorem KW - nonlinear optimization KW - reliability Y1 - 2000 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Staat, Manfred A1 - Heitzer, Michael T1 - The restricted influence of kinematic hardening on shakedown loads N2 - Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratcheting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range. In cyclic plasticity more sophisticated hardening models have been suggested in order to model the strain evolution observed in ratcheting experiments. The hardening models used in shakedown analysis are comparatively simple. It is shown that shakedown analysis can make quite stable predictions of admissible load ranges despite the simplicity of the underlying hardening models. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis. Both give identical or similar shakedown ranges. Structural shakedown analyses show that the loading may have a more pronounced effect than the hardening model. KW - Biomedizinische Technik KW - Einspielen KW - Shakedown KW - Ratcheting KW - Bruchmechanik KW - shakedown KW - material shakedown KW - linear kinematic hardening KW - nonlinear kinematic hardening KW - ratchetting Y1 - 2002 ER -