@article{StaatHeitzerReinersetal.2003, author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M. and Reiners, H. and Schubert, F.}, title = {Shakedown and ratchetting under tension-torsion loadings: analysis and experiments}, series = {Nuclear Engineering and Design. 225 (2003), H. 1}, journal = {Nuclear Engineering and Design. 225 (2003), H. 1}, isbn = {0029-5493}, pages = {11 -- 26}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @incollection{StaatHeitzer2003, author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M.}, title = {Basis reduction technique for limit and shakedown problems}, series = {Numerical Methods for Limit and Shakedown Analysis. Deterministic and Probabilistic Approach. NIC Series Vol. 15 / Ed. by Staat, M.; Heitzer, M.}, booktitle = {Numerical Methods for Limit and Shakedown Analysis. Deterministic and Probabilistic Approach. NIC Series Vol. 15 / Ed. by Staat, M.; Heitzer, M.}, publisher = {John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC)}, address = {J{\"u}lich}, isbn = {3-00-010001-6}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0001-2018112115}, pages = {1 -- 55}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @article{MeyerGaalenLeschingeretal.2019, author = {Meyer, Carolin and Gaalen, Kerstin van and Leschinger, Tim and Scheyerer, Max J. and Neiss, Wolfram F. and Staat, Manfred and M{\"u}ller, Lars P. and Wegmann, Kilian}, title = {Kyphoplasty of Osteoporotic Fractured Vertebrae: A Finite Element Analysis about Two Types of Cement}, series = {BioMed Research International}, journal = {BioMed Research International}, doi = {10.1155/2019/9232813}, pages = {Article ID 9232813}, year = {2019}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BhattaraiFrotscherSoraetal.2014, author = {Bhattarai, Aroj and Frotscher, Ralf and Sora, M.-C. and Staat, Manfred}, title = {A 3D finite element model of the female pelvic floor for the reconstruction of urinary incontinence}, series = {11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM XI) ; 5th European Conference on Computational Mechanics (ECCM V) ; 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECFD VI) ; July 20-25, 2014, Barcelona}, booktitle = {11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM XI) ; 5th European Conference on Computational Mechanics (ECCM V) ; 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECFD VI) ; July 20-25, 2014, Barcelona}, editor = {Onate, E.}, organization = {World Congress on Computational Mechanics <11, 2014, Barcelona>}, pages = {1 -- 12}, year = {2014}, language = {en} } @article{TranKreissigStaat2009, author = {Tran, Thanh Ngoc and Kreißig, R. and Staat, Manfred}, title = {Probabilistic limit and shakedown analysis of thin plates and shells}, series = {Structural safety. 31 (2009), H. 1}, journal = {Structural safety. 31 (2009), H. 1}, publisher = {-}, isbn = {0167-4730}, pages = {1 -- 18}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{StaatTranKreissig2008, author = {Staat, Manfred and Tran, Thanh Ngoc and Kreißig, R.}, title = {Load bearing capacity of thin shell structures made of elastoplastic material by direct methods}, series = {Technische Mechanik. 28 (2008), H. 3-4}, journal = {Technische Mechanik. 28 (2008), H. 3-4}, pages = {299 -- 309}, year = {2008}, language = {en} } @article{TranPhamVuetal.2009, author = {Tran, Thanh Ngoc and Pham, Phu Tinh and Vu, D. K. and Staat, Manfred}, title = {Reliability Analysis of Inelastic Shell Structures Under Variable Loads}, series = {Limit States of Materials and Structures : Direct Methods / Hrsg. Dieter Weichert; Hrsg. Alan Ponter}, journal = {Limit States of Materials and Structures : Direct Methods / Hrsg. Dieter Weichert; Hrsg. Alan Ponter}, publisher = {Springer Netherland}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-1-4020-9633-4}, pages = {135 -- 156}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{StaatHeitzer2002, author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, Michael}, title = {The restricted influence of kinematic hardening on shakedown loads}, year = {2002}, abstract = {Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratcheting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range. In cyclic plasticity more sophisticated hardening models have been suggested in order to model the strain evolution observed in ratcheting experiments. The hardening models used in shakedown analysis are comparatively simple. It is shown that shakedown analysis can make quite stable predictions of admissible load ranges despite the simplicity of the underlying hardening models. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis. Both give identical or similar shakedown ranges. Structural shakedown analyses show that the loading may have a more pronounced effect than the hardening model.}, subject = {Biomedizinische Technik}, language = {en} } @misc{Staat2006, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Engineering Mechanics. Lecture Notes. 2nd edition, translation of the 3rd corrected and extended German edition of "Technische Mechanik"}, year = {2006}, abstract = {English translation of the corrected lectures notes of Sebastian Kr{\"a}mer. Contents 0 Introduction to Mechanics 1 Statics of Rigid Bodies 2 Elastostatics (Strength of Materials) 3 Kinematics 4 Kinetics Literature}, subject = {Technische Mechanik}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{Staat2006, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Problems and chances for probabilistic fracture mechanics in the analysis of steel pressure boundary reliability. - {\"U}berarb. Ausg.}, year = {2006}, abstract = {In: Technical feasibility and reliability of passive safety systems for nuclear power plants. Proceedings of an Advisory Group Meeting held in J{\"u}lich, 21-24 November 1994. - Vienna , 1996. - Seite: 43 - 55 IAEA-TECDOC-920 Abstract: It is shown that the difficulty for probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) is the general problem of the high reliability of a small population. There is no way around the problem as yet. Therefore what PFM can contribute to the reliability of steel pressure boundaries is demon­strated with the example of a typical reactor pressure vessel and critically discussed. Although no method is distinguishable that could give exact failure probabilities, PFM has several addi­tional chances. Upper limits for failure probability may be obtained together with trends for design and operating conditions. Further, PFM can identify the most sensitive parameters, improved control of which would increase reliability. Thus PFM should play a vital role in the analysis of steel pressure boundaries despite all shortcomings.}, subject = {Bruchmechanik}, language = {en} }