@inproceedings{EnningHilgers2023, author = {Enning, Manfred and Hilgers, Rudolf}, title = {Die Assistierte Bremsprobe als Br{\"u}cke zur Vollautomatisierung des Schieneng{\"u}terverkehrs}, series = {IRSA 2023: Tagungsband, Proceedings}, booktitle = {IRSA 2023: Tagungsband, Proceedings}, editor = {Nießen, Nils and Schindler, Christian}, publisher = {RWTH Aachen}, address = {Aachen}, doi = {10.18154/RWTH-2024-00257}, pages = {60 -- 75}, year = {2023}, language = {de} } @article{ManfredMaySutter2020, author = {Manfred, Enning and May, J{\"o}rg and Sutter, Stefan}, title = {Innovation am G{\"u}terwagen am Beispiel der Automatischen Bremsprobe}, series = {ETR - Eisenbahntechnische Rundschau}, journal = {ETR - Eisenbahntechnische Rundschau}, number = {12}, publisher = {DVV Media Group}, address = {Hamburg}, issn = {0013-2845}, pages = {14 -- 19}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Mit der Digitalen Automatischen Kupplung beginnt ein neues Kapitel des Schieneng{\"u}terverkehrs, in dem zusammengestellte Wagen sich automatisch in wenigen Minuten abfahrbereit machen, ohne dass der Mensch eingreifen muss. Eines des gr{\"o}ßten Hemmnisse der umweltfreundlichen Schiene wird dann entfallen. Notwendig ist jetzt eine Diskussion {\"u}ber den Umfang und die Systemgrenzen der Automatischen Bremsprobe.}, language = {de} } @article{EnningSchmidtWilbring2019, author = {Enning, Manfred and Schmidt, Bernd and Wilbring, Daniela}, title = {Auf dem Weg zur autonomen Anschlussbedienung}, series = {Privatbahn-Magazin}, journal = {Privatbahn-Magazin}, number = {3}, publisher = {Bahn Media}, address = {Suhlendorf}, issn = {1865-0163}, pages = {40 -- 43}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{PfaffSchmidtWilbringetal.2019, author = {Pfaff, Raphael and Schmidt, Bernd and Wilbring, Daniela and Franzen, Julian}, title = {Wagon4.0 - the smart wagon for improved integration into Industry 4.0 plants}, series = {Proceedings of the International Heavy Haul Association STS Conference 2019}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Heavy Haul Association STS Conference 2019}, pages = {7 Seiten}, year = {2019}, abstract = {In many instances, freight vehicles exchange load or information with plants that are or will soon be Industry4.0 plants. The Wagon4.0 concept, as developed in close cooperation with e.g. port or mine operations, offers a maximum in railway operational efficiency while providing strong business cases already in the respective plant interaction. The Wagon4.0 consists of main components, a power supply, data network, sensors, actuators and an operating system, the so called WagonOS. The Wagon OS is implemented in a granular, self-sufficient manner, to allow basic features such as WiFi-Mesh and train christening in remote areas without network connection. Furthermore, the granularity of the operating system allows to extend the familiar app concept to freight rail rolling stock, making it possible to use specialised actuators for certain applications, e.g. an electrical parking brake or an auxiliary drive. In order to facilitate migration to the Wagon4.0 for existing fleets, a migration concept featuring five levels of technical adaptation was developed. The present paper investigates the benefits of Wagon4.0-implementations for the particular challenges of heavy haul operations by focusing on train christening, ep-assisted braking, autonomous last mile and traction boost operation as well as improved maintenance schedules}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WilbringEnningPfaffetal.2019, author = {Wilbring, Daniela and Enning, Manfred and Pfaff, Raphael and Schmidt, Bernd}, title = {Neue Perspektiven f{\"u}r die Bahn in der Produktions- und Distributionslogistik durch Prozessautomation}, series = {IRSA 2019: Tagungsband, Proceedings}, booktitle = {IRSA 2019: Tagungsband, Proceedings}, editor = {de Doncker, Rik W. and Nießen, Nils and Schindler, Christian}, publisher = {RWTH Aachen}, address = {Aachen}, doi = {10.18154/RWTH-2020-00014}, pages = {128 -- 142}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Deutschland braucht mehr Eisenbahn um CO2-Emissionen aus dem Verkehr zu reduzieren. Sie muss zum R{\"u}ckgrat aktueller Logistikprozesse, z.B. bei Kaufmannsg{\"u}tern und E-Commerce, werden. Dies geht nicht ohne neuartige betriebliche Konzepte und eine Transformation des G{\"u}terwagens von einem „dummen St{\"u}ck Stahl" zu einem modernen Werkzeug der Logistik. Als „G{\"u}terwagen 4.0" wird ein kommunikativer und kooperativer G{\"u}terwagen verstanden, der die Voraussetzung zur Automatisierung aller Prozesse der Zugvorbereitung bereitstellt, sich aber ansonsten vollkommen kompatibel mit heutigen Betriebsverfahren im Hauptlauf pr{\"a}sentiert. Durch Kommunikation zwischen G{\"u}terwagen und umgebenden intelligenten Systemen im Sinne eines „Internet der Dinge" gelingt damit unter Anderem die Realisierung hoch effizienter Gleisanschlussverkehre, die der G{\"u}terbahn neue M{\"a}rkte abseits der klassisch bahn-affinen Verkehre erschließen und letztlich den Wandel zu einer nachhaltigen G{\"u}termobilit{\"a}t f{\"o}rdern.}, language = {de} } @article{EnningPfaff2017, author = {Enning, Manfred and Pfaff, Raphael}, title = {G{\"u}terwagen 4.0 - Mehr als nur technischer Fortschritt}, series = {Privatbahn-Magazin}, journal = {Privatbahn-Magazin}, number = {2}, publisher = {Bahn Media}, address = {Suhlendorf}, issn = {1865-0163}, pages = {21 -- 25}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Lokomotiven sind dank modernster Konzepte der Antriebstechnik heute energiesparend und umweltfreundlich. Eine Ausr{\"u}stung mit Telematik und Assistenzfunktionen ist Standard. Auf der Strecke zeigt sich moderne Technik in Form elektronischer Stellwerke und Zugsicherungssysteme und in Rangier- und Abstellanlagen als EOW-Technik. Am G{\"u}terwagen hingegen ist der technische Fortschritt komplett vorbeigegangen. Auch beim modernsten Wagen (Abb. 1) ist die einzige „Automatik"-Funktion die zentral {\"u}ber die Hauptluftleitung (HL) versorgte und bet{\"a}tigte Luftbremse.}, language = {de} } @article{EnningPfaff2016, author = {Enning, Manfred and Pfaff, Raphael}, title = {Digitalisierung bringt mehr G{\"u}ter auf die Schiene}, series = {Sonderprojekte ATM/MTZ}, volume = {21}, journal = {Sonderprojekte ATM/MTZ}, number = {6 (suppl.)}, publisher = {Springer Fachmedien}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {2509-4610}, doi = {10.1007/s41491-016-0570-7}, pages = {34 -- 37}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @incollection{Stapenhorst2014, author = {Stapenhorst, Carolin}, title = {Organizzare l'addizione}, series = {Atlante di progettazione architettonica}, booktitle = {Atlante di progettazione architettonica}, editor = {Palma, Riccardo and Ravagnati, Carlo}, publisher = {Citt{\`a}StudiEdizioni}, address = {Mailand}, isbn = {978-88-251-7385-7}, pages = {490 -- 505}, year = {2014}, language = {it} } @phdthesis{Stapenhorst2012, author = {Stapenhorst, Carolin}, title = {The concept as an operant instrument within the interdisciplinarity of the architectural design process}, publisher = {Politecnico di Torino}, address = {Turin}, pages = {242 Seiten}, year = {2012}, abstract = {In the introduction to their book "What is philosophy?" Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari deplore the inflationary and trivialised use of the term concept: "Finally, the most shameful moment came when computer science, marketing, design and advertising, all the disciplines of communication, seized hold of the word concept itself and said: 'This is our concern, we are the creative ones, we are the ideas men! We are the friends of the concept, we put in our computers.' " This doctoral thesis shares the concern of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, but still, it is a thesis in architecture and thus collocated within the field of the representatives of the "ideas men". It engages in architectural design theory, and refers in particular to the investigation of methodological approaches within the design process. Therefore, the thesis will not contribute to the philosophical dimension of the term, but intends to overcome its imprecise use within the architectural discourse, in compliance with Eug{\`e}ne Viollet-le-Duc's admonition relative to vague definitions: "Dans les arts, et dans l'architecture en particulier, les d{\´e}finitions vagues ont caus{\´e} bien des erreurs, ont laiss{\´e} germer bien des pr{\´e}jug{\´e}s, enraciner bien des id{\´e}es fausses. On met un mot en avant, chacun y attache un sens diff{\´e}rent." The term concept in architecture is very often used as pure marketing collateral, it serves to sell an idea, a product, a design. Its functional applicability is reduced to a special manner of illustration, produced as one of the various design presentation documents at the end of the design process. In contrast, the original contribution of this thesis aims to give a precise, instrumental dimension to the term concept: the concept is the expression of a specific logic, capable to guide the decisional sequences of the process and thus to improve the quality of the designed projects. The motivation to define a specific instrumentality of the concept is closely connected to the issue of interdisciplinarity in the architects' profession. The interdisciplinary character of the architectural field is widely accepted and discussed as such, but the thesis intends to give a more precise definition of the various kinds of competences involved by classifying them into either the internal or the external group. The traditional notion of interdisciplinarity, predominantly seen as collaboration between architects and technical experts, and, most notably, the historical, sometimes contentious, relationship between architects and engineers is described. Referring to recent developments, the transformation of the architect's role within the professional sphere, marked by an increasing importance of diverse influences and linked to a growing risk of marginalisation, is illustrated. The thesis describes different ways to adapt to this specific kind of interdisciplinarity, which generally requires the architect's ability to connect and to integrate various contents, different points of view and diverse scales. On the other hand, the big potential which is implicit in the interdisciplinary field is exposed: architects can inform their core competence, the design, by extracting contents of different disciplinary competences, pertaining or not pertaining to their own professional field. They have the possibility to cross fields of external competences in a selective way and by doing so they can build up a corpus of knowledge capable to generate and communicate guidelines and systematic methodologies for their design. At the end, the analysis of these two aspects allows the definition of a more specific professional profile of the architect as specialist of interdisciplinarity. The thesis is concerned with the theories around the design process. The design process is seen as open to inspection and critical evaluation, with major focus on the decisional sequences which characterise it. It concentrates on the process' descriptiveness and the degree of self-conscious approaches applied within it. The importance of regulative, strategic mechanisms is illustrated by testimonies taken from a series of design researches and leads to the functional definition of the figure of the concept as representation of a coherent set of ideas, as generator of a project-specific system of rules and as communicator of decisional strategies. The concept's function is furthermore defined as communicative interface which generates and transmits the system of rules authoritative for all the disciplinary competences involved in the design process, a communicative interface which constitutes a basis of shared convictions capable to increase the efficiency of collaboration. Furthermore, the concept's capacity to explore and elaborate the contents of external disciplines is identified as a possible methodological approach to innovative design thinking. The approach to a specific functional definition of the concept is continued by the description of a series of instruments that are simultaneously generating and communicating it. It is outlined to which degree the concept itself is already the result of an ideational process, collocated within the initial phase of the design proceedings, serving as a guideline to them, but still continuously evolving and adapting in its progression. In addition, it is illustrated how all the diverse instruments of the concept are operational media through which the knowledge transition between different disciplines can occur. The considerations about the concept as operational instrument of design are elaborated with regard to a number of examples of didactical applications that are particularly involved in the development and teaching of specific design methods. These examples illustrate the interrelations between design theory and design education. They are derived from very different schools of architecture and diverse mindsets, but all of them transmit models of conceptual design thinking.}, language = {en} } @book{Stapenhorst2016, author = {Stapenhorst, Carolin}, title = {Concept : a dialogic instrument in architectural design}, publisher = {Jovis}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-86859-364-8}, pages = {207 Seiten}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Concept - this is a key term in architectural discourse. However, all too often it is used imprecisely or merely for marketing purposes. What is a concept actually? This publication moves between design theory and design practice and follows the history of the definition of concept in architecture, leading to the formulation of a specifically instrumental and operative definition. It bases concept in architecture on its strategic potential in design decision-making processes. In the changing profession of the designing architect, decisions are increasingly made in multidisciplinary groups. Concept can serve as a dialogic instrument in the process, making it possible to process heterogeneous information from a range of spheres of knowledge. The effective presentation of selected information becomes a relevant interface in the design process, which has a significant influence on the quality of the design.}, language = {en} }