@article{Staat2002, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Some Achievements of the European Project LISA for FEM Based Limit and Shakedown Analysis}, series = {Computational mechanics : developments and applications, 2002 : presented at the 2002 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August 5 - 9. / Badie, N. [ed]}, journal = {Computational mechanics : developments and applications, 2002 : presented at the 2002 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August 5 - 9. / Badie, N. [ed]}, publisher = {American Society of Mechanical Engineers}, address = {New York}, isbn = {0791846520}, pages = {177 -- 185}, year = {2002}, language = {en} } @article{StaatHeitzer2002, author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M.}, title = {Limit and Shakedown Analysis with Uncertain Data}, series = {Stochastic optimization techniques : numerical methods and technical applications / Marti, K. [ed]}, journal = {Stochastic optimization techniques : numerical methods and technical applications / Marti, K. [ed]}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, isbn = {3-540-42889-5}, pages = {241 -- 254}, year = {2002}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{StaatHeitzer2002, author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, Michael}, title = {The restricted influence of kinematic hardening on shakedown loads}, year = {2002}, abstract = {Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratcheting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range. In cyclic plasticity more sophisticated hardening models have been suggested in order to model the strain evolution observed in ratcheting experiments. The hardening models used in shakedown analysis are comparatively simple. It is shown that shakedown analysis can make quite stable predictions of admissible load ranges despite the simplicity of the underlying hardening models. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis. Both give identical or similar shakedown ranges. Structural shakedown analyses show that the loading may have a more pronounced effect than the hardening model.}, subject = {Biomedizinische Technik}, language = {en} } @misc{Staat2002, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Rezension zu: K. Zimmermann, Technische Mechanik - multimedial. Fachbuch Verlag Leipzig (2000)}, series = {Technische Mechanik}, volume = {22}, journal = {Technische Mechanik}, number = {1}, issn = {0232-3869}, pages = {76 -- 77}, year = {2002}, language = {de} } @article{StaatHeitzerReinersetal.2003, author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M. and Reiners, H. and Schubert, F.}, title = {Shakedown and ratchetting under tension-torsion loadings: analysis and experiments}, series = {Nuclear Engineering and Design. 225 (2003), H. 1}, journal = {Nuclear Engineering and Design. 225 (2003), H. 1}, isbn = {0029-5493}, pages = {11 -- 26}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @article{StaatSchwartzLangetal.2003, author = {Staat, Manfred and Schwartz, M. and Lang, H. and Wirtz, K. and Heitzer, M.}, title = {Design by Analysis of Pressure Components by non-linear Optimization}, series = {The 10th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology, July 7-10, 2003, Vienna, Austria, Proceedings ICPVT-10 / Zeman, J. L. [ed]}, journal = {The 10th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology, July 7-10, 2003, Vienna, Austria, Proceedings ICPVT-10 / Zeman, J. L. [ed]}, publisher = {{\"O}GS, {\"O}sterreichische Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Schweißtechnik}, address = {Wien}, isbn = {3950152814}, pages = {59 -- 65}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @article{StaatHeitzer2003, author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M.}, title = {Probabilistic limit and shakedown problems}, series = {Numerical Methods for Limit and Shakedown Analysis. Deterministic and Probabilistic Approach. NIC Series Vol. 15 / Ed. by Staat, M; Heitzer, M.}, journal = {Numerical Methods for Limit and Shakedown Analysis. Deterministic and Probabilistic Approach. NIC Series Vol. 15 / Ed. by Staat, M; Heitzer, M.}, publisher = {John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC)}, address = {J{\"u}lich}, isbn = {3-00-010001-6}, pages = {217 -- 268}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @incollection{StaatHeitzer2003, author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M.}, title = {Basis reduction technique for limit and shakedown problems}, series = {Numerical Methods for Limit and Shakedown Analysis. Deterministic and Probabilistic Approach. NIC Series Vol. 15 / Ed. by Staat, M.; Heitzer, M.}, booktitle = {Numerical Methods for Limit and Shakedown Analysis. Deterministic and Probabilistic Approach. NIC Series Vol. 15 / Ed. by Staat, M.; Heitzer, M.}, publisher = {John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC)}, address = {J{\"u}lich}, isbn = {3-00-010001-6}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0001-2018112115}, pages = {1 -- 55}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @article{Staat2003, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Shakedown and ratchetting under tension-torsion loadings: analysis and experiments}, year = {2003}, abstract = {Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratchetting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratchetting range. The performed experiment comprised a hollow tension specimen which was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with constant moments. First, a series of uniaxial tests has been carried out in order to calibrate a bounded kinematic hardening rule. The load parameters have been selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses with the PERMAS code using a kinematic hardening material model. It is shown that this shakedown analysis gives reasonable agreement between the experimental and the numerical results. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis.}, subject = {Einspielen }, language = {en} } @inproceedings{Staat2003, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Design by Analysis of Pressure Components by non-linear Optimization}, year = {2003}, abstract = {This paper presents the direct route to Design by Analysis (DBA) of the new European pressure vessel standard in the language of limit and shakedown analysis (LISA). This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for some examples from the DBA-Manual. One observation from the examples is, that the optimisation approach gives reliable and close lower bound solutions leading to simple and optimised design decision.}, language = {en} }