@book{Kraft2007, author = {Kraft, Bodo}, title = {Semantische Unterst{\"u}tzung des konzeptuellen Geb{\"a}udeentwurfs}, publisher = {Shaker}, address = {Aachen}, isbn = {978-3-8322-6045-3}, pages = {VIII, 381 S. : Ill., graph. Darst.}, year = {2007}, language = {de} } @article{KirchhofKraft2012, author = {Kirchhof, Michael and Kraft, Bodo}, title = {Hybrides Vorgehensmodell : Agile und klassische Methoden im Projekt passend kombinieren}, series = {ProjektMagazin}, journal = {ProjektMagazin}, number = {11}, publisher = {Berleb Media}, address = {Taufkirchen}, pages = {11 S.}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Agil ist im Trend und immer mehr Unternehmen, die ihre Projekte bisher nach klassischen Prinzipien durchf{\"u}hrten, denken {\"u}ber den Einsatz agiler Methoden nach. Doch selbst wenn die Organisation bereits beide Philosophien unterst{\"u}tzt, gilt f{\"u}r ein Projekt meist die klare Vorgabe: agil oder klassisch. Es gibt aber noch einen anderen Ansatz, mit diesen "unterschiedlichen Welten" umzugehen: Und zwar die beiden Philosophien innerhalb eines Projekts zu kombinieren. Wie dies in der Praxis aussehen und gelingen kann, zeigen Dr. Michael Kirchhof und Prof. Dr. Bodo Kraft in diesem Beitrag.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{KirchhofKraft2011, author = {Kirchhof, Michael and Kraft, Bodo}, title = {Dogmatisches „Entweder agil oder klassisch" im Projektmanagement hat ausgedient - die richtige Mischung macht's}, series = {Projekt-Sternstunden : strahlende Erfolge durch Kompetenz}, booktitle = {Projekt-Sternstunden : strahlende Erfolge durch Kompetenz}, publisher = {GPM}, address = {N{\"u}rnberg}, isbn = {978-3-924841-60-7}, pages = {414 -- 425}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{HeerRedkowitzKraft2008, author = {Heer, Thomas and Redkowitz, Daniel and Kraft, Bodo}, title = {Tool Support for the Integration of Light-Weight Ontologies}, isbn = {978-3-642-00670-8}, year = {2008}, abstract = {Abstract of the authors: In many areas of computer science ontologies become more and more important. The use of ontologies for domain modeling often brings up the issue of ontology integration. The task of merging several ontologies, covering specific subdomains, into one united ontology has to be solved. Many approaches for ontology integration aim at automating the process of ontology alignment. However, a complete automation is not feasible, and user interaction is always required. Nevertheless, most ontology integration tools offer only very limited support for the interactive part of the integration process. In this paper, we present a novel approach for the interactive integration of ontologies. The result of the ontology integration is incrementally updated after each definition of a correspondence between ontology elements. The user is guided through the ontologies to be integrated. By restricting the possible user actions, the integrity of all defined correspondences is ensured by the tool we developed. We evaluated our tool by integrating different regulations concerning building design.}, subject = {Ontologie }, language = {de} } @article{HackerKraftZoell2011, author = {Hacker, Tobias and Kraft, Bodo and Z{\"o}ll, Axel}, title = {Projektzuschnitt f{\"u}r die inkrementelle Systementwicklung im Konzernverbund}, isbn = {978-3-8322-9990-3}, pages = {78 -- 83}, year = {2011}, language = {de} }