@article{BalzerStreit2017,
  author    = {Balzer, Hermann and Streit, Daniel},
  title     = {Das Translationsrisiko multinationaler Konzerne in Deutschland: Eine explorative Analyse von Verst{\"a}ndnis, Bedeutung und Management-Praxis mit Hilfe der Critical Incident Technique},
  series = {Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift f{\"u}r betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung},
  journal   = {Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift f{\"u}r betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung},
  number    = {Online first},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2366-6153},
  doi       = {10.1007/s41471-017-0029-x},
  pages     = {1 -- 40},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BalzerStreitHeinze2017,
  author    = {Balzer, Hermann and Streit, Daniel and Heinze, Marcel},
  title     = {Implikationen der Digitalisierung f{\"u}r den Finanzbereich der Unternehmung und das Rollenbild des CFO},
  series = {Betriebswirtschaftliche Implikationen der digitalen Transformation. ZfbF - Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift f{\"u}r betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Sonderheft 72},
  journal   = {Betriebswirtschaftliche Implikationen der digitalen Transformation. ZfbF - Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift f{\"u}r betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Sonderheft 72},
  number    = {72},
  editor    = {Krause, Stefan},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-18751-4_14},
  pages     = {267 -- 283},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BeckerDelfmannDietrichetal.2016,
  author    = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Delfmann, Patrick and Dietrich, Hanns-Alexander and Steinhorst, Matthias and Eggert, Mathias},
  title     = {Business Process Compliance Checking — Applying and Evaluating a Generic Pattern Matching Approach for Conceptual Models in the Financial Sector},
  series = {Information Systems Frontiers},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {Information Systems Frontiers},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1572-9419},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10796-014-9529-y},
  pages     = {359 -- 405},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Given the strong increase in regulatory requirements for business processes the management of business process compliance becomes a more and more regarded field in IS research. Several methods have been developed to support compliance checking of conceptual models. However, their focus on distinct modeling languages and mostly linear (i.e., predecessor-successor related) compliance rules may hinder widespread adoption and application in practice. Furthermore, hardly any of them has been evaluated in a real-world setting. We address this issue by applying a generic pattern matching approach for conceptual models to business process compliance checking in the financial sector. It consists of a model query language, a search algorithm and a corresponding modelling tool prototype. It is (1) applicable for all graph-based conceptual modeling languages and (2) for different kinds of compliance rules. Furthermore, based on an applicability check, we (3) evaluate the approach in a financial industry project setting against its relevance for decision support of audit and compliance management tasks.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeckerDelfmannEggertetal.2012,
  author    = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Delfmann, Patrick and Eggert, Mathias and Schwittay, Sebastian},
  title     = {Generalizability and Applicability of Model-Based Business Process Compliance-Checking Approaches — A State-of-the-Art Analysis and Research Roadmap},
  series = {Business Research : BuR},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Business Research : BuR},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {1866-8658},
  doi       = {10.1007/BF03342739},
  pages     = {221 -- 247},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {With a steady increase of regulatory requirements for business processes, automation support of compliance management is a field garnering increasing attention in Information Systems research. Several approaches have been developed to support compliance checking of process models. One major challenge for such approaches is their ability to handle different modeling techniques and compliance rules in order to enable widespread adoption and application. Applying a structured literature search strategy, we reflect and discuss compliance-checking approaches in order to provide an insight into their generalizability and evaluation. The results imply that current approaches mainly focus on special modeling techniques and/or a restricted set of types of compliance rules. Most approaches abstain from real-world evaluation which raises the question of their practical applicability. Referring to the search results, we propose a roadmap for further research in model-based business process compliance checking.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BenzelLinzbach2010,
  author    = {Benzel, Ute and Linzbach, Meike},
  title     = {Bilanzierung und Offenlegung von Ertragsteuerrisiken - Quo vadis? Unsichere Steuerpositionen in der Rechnungslegung nach IFRS, US-GAAP und HGB},
  series = {IRZ - Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Rechnungslegung},
  journal   = {IRZ - Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Internationale Rechnungslegung},
  number    = {11},
  issn      = {1862-5533},
  pages     = {475 -- 523},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {In den letzten drei bis vier Jahren unterlag der Bereich der Bilanzierung und Offenlegung von unsicheren Steuerpositionen im IFRS- und US-GAAP-Abschluss einem stetigen Wandel. Sowohl nach US-GAAP als auch nach IFRS nehmen die Anforderungen an die Bilanzierung und Offenlegung best{\"a}ndig zu. Schon allein dies zeigt die Bedeutung, die dem Themenbereich der Steuerrisiken beigemessen wird. Aber nicht nur im Rahmen der Berichterstattung im Jahresabschluss stehen Steuerrisiken oben auf der Agenda, auch der amerikanische Internal Revenue Service (IRS) verfolgt das Thema sehr konsequent und plant, bestimmte Unternehmen zu Angaben von Steuerrisiken im Rahmen der Steuererkl{\"a}rungen zu verpflichten. Der Aufsatz befasst sich mit den neueren Entwicklungen im Bereich der Bilanzierung und Offenlegung von unsicheren Steuerpositionen in der Rechnungslegung nach IFRS, US-GAAP und HGB und der Offenlegung von Steuerrisiken im Rahmen der Steuererkl{\"a}rung.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BenzelLinzbach2009,
  author    = {Benzel, Ute and Linzbach, Meike},
  title     = {Neue Vorschriften f{\"u}r die Bilanzierung von Steuerrisikor{\"u}ckstellungen : der Exposure Draft ED/2009/2 des IASB},
  series = {KoR - Zeitschrift f{\"u}r kapitalmarktorientierte Rechnungslegung},
  volume    = {Jg. 9},
  journal   = {KoR - Zeitschrift f{\"u}r kapitalmarktorientierte Rechnungslegung},
  number    = {H. 7/8},
  issn      = {1437-8981 ; 1617-8084},
  pages     = {400 -- 408},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BenzelLinzbach2009,
  author    = {Benzel, Ute and Linzbach, Meike},
  title     = {Auswirkungen des Forderungsverzichtes - Steuerliche Belastung und Beeinflussung der Steuerquote},
  series = {Deutsches Steuerrecht : DStR ; Wochenschrift \& umfassende Datenbank f{\"u}r Steuerberater ; Steuerrecht, Wirtschaftsrecht, Betriebswirtschaft, Beruf ; Organ der Bundessteuerberaterkammer},
  volume    = {Jg. 47},
  journal   = {Deutsches Steuerrecht : DStR ; Wochenschrift \& umfassende Datenbank f{\"u}r Steuerberater ; Steuerrecht, Wirtschaftsrecht, Betriebswirtschaft, Beruf ; Organ der Bundessteuerberaterkammer},
  number    = {H. 31},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  issn      = {0012-1347 ; 0949-7676},
  pages     = {1599 -- 1602},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BenzelUtzerath2013,
  author    = {Benzel, Ute and Utzerath, Meike},
  title     = {Latente Steuern im Zusammenhang mit Beteiligungen an Tochterunternehmen im IFRS-Konzernabschluss},
  series = {Internationale Steuer-Rundschau : ISR ; Zeitschrift f{\"u}r internationales Steuerrecht},
  journal   = {Internationale Steuer-Rundschau : ISR ; Zeitschrift f{\"u}r internationales Steuerrecht},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln},
  issn      = {2194-539X},
  pages     = {143 -- 148},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Bernecker2010,
  author    = {Bernecker, Andreas},
  title     = {A European Private Company: Is Europe's single legal form for SMEs close to approval?},
  series = {Research Briefing},
  journal   = {Research Briefing},
  publisher = {Deutsche Bank Research},
  address   = {Frankfurt a. M.},
  issn      = {2193-5955},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {This Research Briefing, issued in July 2010, concluded that: - Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Europe have long called for a matching legal form valid across the EU (similar to that of the European company (SE) for large firms) - The main benefits would be the availability of uniform Europe-wide company structures, significant cost reductions for businesses and further integration of the internal market - Given the differing national views regarding the concrete features of the new legal form there is currently no sign of an agreement being reached at the European level in the short term; however, it is possible that progress will be made in negotiations during the year - The key issues being discussed in depth are company formation, transnationality and employee participation rights in the new European private company (SPE).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Bernecker2016,
  author    = {Bernecker, Andreas},
  title     = {Divided we reform? Evidence from US welfare policies},
  series = {Journal of Public Economics},
  volume    = {142},
  journal   = {Journal of Public Economics},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0047-2727},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.003},
  pages     = {24 -- 38},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Divided government is often thought of as causing legislative deadlock. I investigate the link between divided government and economic reforms using a novel data set on welfare reforms in US states between 1978 and 2010. Panel data regressions show that, under divided government, a US state is around 25\% more likely to adopt a welfare reform than under unified government. Several robustness checks confirm this counter-intuitive finding. Case study evidence suggests an explanation based on policy competition between governor, senate, and house.},
  language  = {en}
}