@article{BohndickBosseJaenschetal.2021,
  author    = {Bohndick, Carla and Bosse, Elke and J{\"a}nsch, Vanessa K. and Barnat, Miriam},
  title     = {How different diversity factors affect the perception of first-year requirements in higher education},
  series = {Frontline Learning Research},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Frontline Learning Research},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {EARLI},
  issn      = {2295-3159},
  doi       = {10.14786/flr.v9i2.667},
  pages     = {78 -- 95},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In the light of growing university entry rates, higher education institutions not only serve larger numbers of students, but also seek to meet first-year students' ever more diverse needs. Yet to inform universities how to support the transition to higher education, research only offers limited insights. Current studies tend to either focus on the individual factors that affect student success or they highlight students' social background and their educational biography in order to examine the achievement of selected, non-traditional groups of students. Both lines of research appear to lack integration and often fail to take organisational diversity into account, such as different types of higher education institutions or degree programmes. For a more comprehensive understanding of student diversity, the present study includes individual, social and organisational factors. To gain insights into their role for the transition to higher education, we examine how the different factors affect the students' perception of the formal and informal requirements of the first year as more or less difficult to cope with. As the perceived requirements result from both the characteristics of the students and the institutional context, they allow to investigate transition at the interface of the micro and the meso level of higher education. Latent profile analyses revealed that there are no profiles with complex patterns of perception of the first-year requirements, but the identified groups rather differ in the overall level of perceived challenges. Moreover, SEM indicates that the differences in the perception largely depend on the individual factors self-efficacy and volition.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Maurischat2021,
  author    = {Maurischat, Andreas},
  title     = {Algebraic independence of the Carlitz period and its hyperderivatives},
  pages     = {1 -- 12},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GazdaMaurischat2020,
  author    = {Gazda, Quentin and Maurischat, Andreas},
  title     = {Special functions and Gauss-Thakur sums in higher rank and dimension},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  pages     = {26 Seiten},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{BuchholtzBarnatBosseetal.2019,
  author    = {Buchholtz, Nils and Barnat, Miriam and Bosse, Elke and Heemsoth, Tim and Vorh{\"o}lter, Katrin and Wibowo, Jonas},
  title     = {Praxistransfer in der terti{\"a}ren Bildungsforschung: Modelle, Gelingensbedingungen und Nachhaltigkeit},
  publisher = {Hamburg University Press},
  address   = {Hamburg},
  isbn      = {978-3-943423-72-3},
  pages     = {232 Seiten},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{BosseDeClercqBarnat2018,
  author    = {Bosse, Elke and De Clercq, Mikael and Barnat, Miriam},
  title     = {The Role of Diversity for the Transition to Higher Education},
  series = {EARLI SIG 4, Giessen},
  booktitle = {EARLI SIG 4, Giessen},
  pages     = {13 Folien},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{BosseBarnat2019,
  author    = {Bosse, Elke and Barnat, Miriam},
  title     = {Kombination quantitativer und qualitativer Methoden zur Untersuchung der Studieneingangsphase},
  series = {Hochschulbildungsforschung. Theoretische, methodologische und methodische Denkanst{\"o}ße f{\"u}r die Hochschuldidaktik},
  booktitle = {Hochschulbildungsforschung. Theoretische, methodologische und methodische Denkanst{\"o}ße f{\"u}r die Hochschuldidaktik},
  editor    = {Jenert, Tobias and Reinmann, Gabi and Schmohl, Tobias},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-20308-5},
  pages     = {169 -- 184},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{BarnatJaensch2019,
  author    = {Barnat, Miriam and J{\"a}nsch, Vanessa K.},
  title     = {Forschendes Lernen und Studienerfolg: Die Bedeutung epistemischer Neugier},
  series = {Forschendes Lernen in der Studieneingangsphase: Empirische Befunde, Fallbeispiele und individuelle Perspektiven},
  booktitle = {Forschendes Lernen in der Studieneingangsphase: Empirische Befunde, Fallbeispiele und individuelle Perspektiven},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-25312-7},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-25312-7_6},
  pages     = {99 -- 109},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Forschendes Lernen ist dazu geeignet, epistemische Neugier - definiert als Freude an neuen Erkenntnissen - anzuregen und zu befriedigen. Neben der Selbstwirksamkeit zeigt sich die Neugier als relevant f{\"u}r den Studienerfolg. Allerdings ist bisher nicht gekl{\"a}rt, in welcher Beziehung diese beiden Konstrukte zueinanderstehen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{BosseBarnat2019,
  author    = {Bosse, Elke and Barnat, Miriam},
  title     = {Kombination qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden zur Untersuchung der Studieneinstiegsphase},
  series = {Hochschulbildungsforschung : Theoretische, methodologische und methodische Denkanst{\"o}ße f{\"u}r die Hochschuldidaktik},
  booktitle = {Hochschulbildungsforschung : Theoretische, methodologische und methodische Denkanst{\"o}ße f{\"u}r die Hochschuldidaktik},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-20309-2},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-20309-2_10},
  pages     = {169 -- 184},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Mit Hilfe der Kombination von qualitativen und quantitativen Verfahren zielen Mixed-Methods Ans{\"a}tze darauf ab, einen vertieften Einblick in komplexe Gegenst{\"a}nde zu gewinnen. In der Hochschulbildungsforschung finden sie zunehmend Anklang, da sie besonders geeignet erscheinen, das vielschichtige Wirkungsgef{\"u}ge zu erfassen, das das Lehren und Lernen an Hochschulen auszeichnet. Der Beitrag geht den Potenzialen von Mixed-Methods Ans{\"a}tzen am Beispiel einer Studie zur Studieneingangsphase nach, die den Wirkungszusammenhang zwischen der Nutzung von Angeboten f{\"u}r den Studieneinstieg und der Entwicklung von Studierf{\"a}higkeit untersucht. Der Beitrag veranschaulicht die Integration von Methoden und Ergebnissen, um Chancen und Grenzen von Mixed-Methods Studien f{\"u}r die Hochschulbildungsforschung zu diskutieren.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Barnat2005,
  author    = {Barnat, Miriam},
  title     = {Lernen und Macht in einer Non-Profit-Organisation. Discussion Paper SPIII 2005-103},
  publisher = {Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin f{\"u}r Sozialforschung},
  address   = {Berlin},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Barnat2007,
  author    = {Barnat, Miriam},
  title     = {Organisationale Lernprozesse und Machtquellen. Eine Fallstudie},
  series = {Beratung, Macht und organisationales Lernen},
  booktitle = {Beratung, Macht und organisationales Lernen},
  publisher = {VS Verlag f{\"u}r Sozialwissenschaften},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-531-90752-9},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-531-90752-9_7},
  pages     = {97 -- 110},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}