@techreport{BerneckerBoyerGathmann2018,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Bernecker, Andreas and Boyer, Pierre and Gathmann, Christina},
  title     = {The Role of Electoral Incentives for Policy Innovation: Evidence from the US Welfare Reform},
  series = {CESifo Working Paper},
  journal   = {CESifo Working Paper},
  number    = {No. 6964},
  organization    = {CESifo Group Munich},
  issn      = {ISSN 2364-1428 (electronic version)},
  pages     = {60},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BerneckerKlierSternetal.2018,
  author    = {Bernecker, Andreas and Klier, Julia and Stern, Sebastian and Thiel, Lea},
  title     = {Sustaining high performance beyond public-sector pilot projects.},
  number    = {September 2018},
  organization    = {McKinsey\&Company},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{RichterBraunsteinStaeudleetal.2018,
  author    = {Richter, Charlotte and Braunstein, Bjoern and St{\"a}udle, Benjamin and Attias, Julia and Suess, Alexander and Weber, T. and Rittweger, Joern and Green, David A. and Albracht, Kirsten},
  title     = {In vivo fascicle length of the gastrocnemius muscle during walking in simulated martian gravity using two different body weight support devices},
  series = {23rd Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, Dublin, Irland},
  booktitle = {23rd Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, Dublin, Irland},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Keinz2018,
  author    = {Keinz, Jan},
  title     = {Optimization of a Dry Low NOx Micromix Combustor for an Industrial Gas Turbine Using Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Fuel},
  publisher = {Universit{\´e} Libre de Bruxelles - Brussels School of Engineering Aero-Thermo-Mechanics},
  address   = {Br{\"u}ssel},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{FockeSteinbeck2018,
  author    = {Focke, Markus and Steinbeck, J{\"o}rn},
  title     = {Steigerung der Anlagenproduktivit{\"a}t durch OEE-Management : Definitionen, Vorgehen und Methoden - von manuell bis Industrie 4.0},
  publisher = {Springer Fachmedien},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-21456-2},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-21456-2},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HirschKleebergSchmitz2018,
  author    = {Hirsch, Marko and Kleeberg, Jochen and Schmitz, Philipp},
  title     = {Dynamische Asset-Allocation- Strategien im Niedrigzinsumfeld},
  series = {Absolut|report : neue Perspektiven f{\"u}r institutionelle Investoren},
  journal   = {Absolut|report : neue Perspektiven f{\"u}r institutionelle Investoren},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Absolut Research},
  address   = {Hamburg},
  pages     = {52},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{SchoeningPoghossian2018,
  author    = {Sch{\"o}ning, Michael Josef and Poghossian, Arshak},
  title     = {Enzyme und Biosensorik},
  series = {Einf{\"u}hrung in die Enzymtechnologie},
  booktitle = {Einf{\"u}hrung in die Enzymtechnologie},
  publisher = {Springer Spektrum},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-662-57619-9},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-662-57619-9_18},
  pages     = {323 -- 347},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Enzymbasierte Biosensoren finden seit mehr als f{\"u}nf Jahrzehnten einen prosperierenden Wachstumsmarkt und werden zunehmend auch in biotechnologischen Prozessen eingesetzt. In diesem Kapitel werden, ausgehend vom Sensorbegriff und typischen Kenngr{\"o}ßen f{\"u}r Biosensoren (Abschn. 18.1), elektrochemische Enzym-Biosensoren vorgestellt und deren typischen Einsatzgebiete diskutiert (Abschn. 18.2). Ein Blick {\"u}ber den „Tellerrand" hinaus zeigt alternative Transduktorprinzipien (Abschn. 18.3) und f{\"u}hrt abschließend in aktuelle Forschungstrends ein (Abschn. 18.4).},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BergSchleserDelidovichetal.2018,
  author    = {Berg, Alexander-Karl and Schleser, Markus and Delidovich, Artem and Houben, Alexander},
  title     = {Ultraschallunterst{\"u}tzter Schmelzklebstoffauftrag},
  series = {adh{\"a}sion KLEBEN \& DICHTEN},
  volume    = {Volume 62},
  journal   = {adh{\"a}sion KLEBEN \& DICHTEN},
  number    = {Issue 12},
  publisher = {Springer},
  doi       = {10.1007/s35145-018-0089-z},
  pages     = {32 -- 37},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{FingerBraunBil2018,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Impact of electric propulsion technology and mission requirements on the performance of VTOL UAVs},
  series = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Springer},
  issn      = {1869-5582 print},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13272-018-0352-x},
  pages     = {843},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {One of the engineering challenges in aviation is the design of transitioning vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft. Thrust-borne flight implies a higher mass fraction of the propulsion system, as well as much increased energy consumption in the take-off and landing phases. This mass increase is typically higher for aircraft with a separate lift propulsion system than for aircraft that use the cruise propulsion system to support a dedicated lift system. However, for a cost-benefit trade study, it is necessary to quantify the impact the VTOL requirement and propulsion configuration has on aircraft mass and size. For this reason, sizing studies are conducted. This paper explores the impact of considering a supplemental electric propulsion system for achieving hovering flight. Key variables in this study, apart from the lift system configuration, are the rotor disk loading and hover flight time, as well as the electrical systems technology level for both batteries and motors. Payload and endurance are typically used as the measures of merit for unmanned aircraft that carry electro-optical sensors, and therefore the analysis focuses on these particular parameters.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EngelHoltmannUlberetal.2018,
  author    = {Engel, Mareike and Holtmann, Dirk and Ulber, Roland and Tippk{\"o}tter, Nils},
  title     = {Increased Biobutanol Production by Mediator-Less Electro-Fermentation},
  series = {Biotechnology Journal},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Biotechnology Journal},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Wiley-VCH},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {1860-7314},
  doi       = {10.1002/biot.201800514},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {A future bio-economy should not only be based on renewable raw materials but also in the raise of carbon yields of existing production routes. Microbial electrochemical technologies are gaining increased attention for this purpose. In this study, the electro-fermentative production of biobutanol with C. acetobutylicum without the use of exogenous mediators is investigated regarding the medium composition and the reactor design. It is shown that the use of an optimized synthetic culture medium allows higher product concentrations, increased biofilm formation, and higher conductivities compared to a synthetic medium supplemented with yeast extract. Moreover, the optimization of the reactor system results in a doubling of the maximum product concentrations for fermentation products. When a working electrode is polarized at -600 mV vs. Ag/AgCl, a shift from butyrate to acetone and butanol production is induced. This leads to an increased final solvent yield of Yᴀᴃᴇ = 0.202 gg⁻¹ (control 0.103 gg⁻¹), which is also reflected in a higher carbon efficiency of 37.6\% compared to 23.3\% (control) as well as a fourfold decrease in simplified E-factor to 0.43. The results are promising for further development of biobutanol production in bioelectrochemical systems in order to fulfil the principles of Green Chemistry.},
  language  = {en}
}