@inproceedings{ButenwegSadeghAzarMeskouris2004, author = {Butenweg, Christoph and Sadegh-Azar, H. and Meskouris, Konstantin}, title = {Seismische Vulnerabilit{\"a}t von bestehenden Bauwerken}, series = {5. Forum und Gefahrentag : auf der Suche nach dem Risiko : ein aktuelles Symposium zu Fragen der Risikowahrnehmung und Katastrophenvorsorge in Deutschland, ZDF Mainz Lerchenberg, 13. - 14. Oktober, 2004}, booktitle = {5. Forum und Gefahrentag : auf der Suche nach dem Risiko : ein aktuelles Symposium zu Fragen der Risikowahrnehmung und Katastrophenvorsorge in Deutschland, ZDF Mainz Lerchenberg, 13. - 14. Oktober, 2004}, pages = {1}, year = {2004}, language = {de} } @misc{BisselsJahn2004, author = {Bissels, Anne and Jahn, Amelie}, title = {Schweinebraten}, year = {2004}, abstract = {Der Kurzfilm begleitet einen Mann und seine H{\"u}ndin Gerti auf einem Spaziergang. Die Filmperspektive ist die des Tieres.}, subject = {Kurzfilm}, language = {de} } @article{Staat2004, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Plastic collapse analysis of longitudinally flawed pipes and vessels}, year = {2004}, abstract = {Improved collapse loads of thick-walled, crack containing pipes and vessels are suggested. Very deep cracks have a residual strength which is better modelled by a global limit load. In all burst tests, the ductility of pressure vessel steels was sufficiently high whereby the burst pressure could be predicted by limit analysis with no need to apply fracture mechanics. The relative prognosis error increases however, for long and deep defects due to uncertainties of geometry and strength data.}, subject = {Druckbeh{\"a}lter}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{KraftNagl2004, author = {Kraft, Bodo and Nagl, Manfred}, title = {Parameterized specification of conceptual design tools in civil engineering}, year = {2004}, abstract = {Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2004, Volume 3062/2004, 90-105, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25959-6_7 In this paper we discuss how tools for conceptual design in civil engineering can be developed using graph transformation specifications. These tools consist of three parts: (a) for elaborating specific conceptual knowledge (knowledge engineer), (b) for working out conceptual design results (architect), and (c) automatic consistency analyses which guarantee that design results are consistent with the underlying specific conceptual knowledge. For the realization of such tools we use a machinery based on graph transformations. In a traditional PROGRES tool specification the conceptual knowledge for a class of buildings is hard-wired within the specification. This is not appropriate for the experimentation platform approach we present in this paper, as objects and relations for conceptual knowledge are due to many changes, implied by evaluation of their use and corresponding improvements. Therefore, we introduce a parametric specification method with the following characteristics: (1) The underlying specific knowledge for a class of buildings is not fixed. Instead, it is built up as a data base by using the knowledge tools. (2) The specification for the architect tools also does not incorporate specific conceptual knowledge. (3) An incremental checker guarantees whether a design result is consistent with the current state of the underlying conceptual knowledge (data base).}, subject = {CAD}, language = {de} } @misc{RoesslerKuehn2004, author = {R{\"o}ßler, Edith and K{\"u}hn, Nicola}, title = {Murphy's law}, year = {2004}, abstract = {Ein Kurzfilm {\"u}ber den letzten Morgen im Leben eines Mannes, das durch Murphy's Law gekennzeichnet ist}, subject = {Mediendesign}, language = {de} } @misc{BisselsJahn2004, author = {Bissels, Anne and Jahn, Amelie}, title = {Multiplex}, year = {2004}, abstract = {Eine kurze Folge einer Fernsehsendung namens Multiplex. Gesendet wird ein Portait der kubanischen Diva Omara Portuondo auf Europatourn{\´e}e.}, subject = {Mediendesign}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{ZischankHeidlerWiesingeretal.2004, author = {Zischank, Wolfgang J. and Heidler, Fridolin and Wiesinger, J. and Stimper, K. and Kern, Alexander and Seevers, M.}, title = {Magnetic Fields and Induced Voltages inside LPZ 1 Measured at a 1:6 Scale Model Building}, year = {2004}, abstract = {Laborexperimente zu Blitzschutzzonen in Stahlbetongeb{\"a}uden anhand eines Modells im Maßstab 1:6}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{KernHeidlerSeeversetal.2004, author = {Kern, Alexander and Heidler, Fridolin and Seevers, M. and Zischank, Wolfgang J.}, title = {Magnetic Fields and Induced Voltages in case of a Direct Strike - Comparison of Results obtained from Measurements at a Scaled Building to those of IEC 62305-4}, isbn = {0304-3886}, year = {2004}, abstract = {In the paper the results obtained from experiments at a modelled reinforced building in case of a direct lightning strike are compared with calculations. The comparison includes peak values of the magnetic field Hmax, its derivative (dH/dt)max and of induced voltages umax in typical cable routings. The experiments are performed at a 1:6 scaled building and the results are extrapolated using the similarity relations theory. The calculations are based on the approximate formulae given in IEC 62305-4 and have to be supplemented by a rough estimation of the additional shielding effect of a second reinforcement layer. The comparison shows, that the measured peak values of the magnetic field and its derivative are mostly lower than the calculated. The induced voltages are in good agreement. Hence, calculations of the induced voltages based on IEC 62305-4 are a good method for lightning protection studies of buildings, where the reinforcement is used as a grid-like electromagnetic shield.}, subject = {Blitz}, language = {en} } @misc{Wessling2004, author = {Weßling, Matthias}, title = {Lideran{\c{c}}a e Motiva{\c{c}}{\~a}o Organizacional: Conceitos, Auto-Avalia{\c{c}}{\~o}es, Experi{\^e}ncias}, year = {2004}, abstract = {Pensando na motiva{\c{c}}{\~a}o de uma perspectiva gerencial, {\´e} muito importante ter a seguinte vis{\~a}o: ninguem pode conseguir motivar outras pessoas, mas um lider pode influenci{\´a}-las a fazer as coisas com mais entusiasmo. Al{\´e}m disso, ele deve conhecer a sua personalidade mesmo. Ele precisa de reconhecimento dos pontos fortes e fracos proprios. Quem - por exemplo - {\´e} bem fechado, precisa desenvolver mais forca para motivar as outras pessoas. Quem - por outro exemplo - adora de fazer todas coisas sozinho, vai ter dificuldades com delega{\c{c}}{\~a}o para seus funcionarios. Se ele sabe desse ponto fraco proprio, ele pode evitar esse ponto fraco e delegar de verdade. Para conseguir essa meta, um dialogo de ´feedback´ com os funcionarios e muito importante para descobrir as diferen{\c{c}}as entre a auto-percep{\c{c}}{\~a}o e o percep{\c{c}}{\~a}o dos outros, por exemplo sobre o estilo de lideran{\c{c}}a aplicada.}, subject = {F{\"u}hrung}, language = {pt} } @misc{Roeth2004, author = {R{\"o}th, Thilo}, title = {Leichtbau und Karosserietechnik}, year = {2004}, abstract = {Studienschwerpunkt Leichtbau und Karosserietechnik an der FH Aachen, Grobstruktur der Lehrinhalte, Studentenprojekt "CAPRO"}, subject = {Leichtbau}, language = {de} }