@article{SchulteZurhausenPoznanska1994, author = {Schulte-Zurhausen, Manfred and Poznanska, K.}, title = {Kryteria klasyfikacji malych i srednich przedsiebiorstw = Kriterien zur Klassifizierung von kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen}, series = {Przeglad Organizacji (1994)}, journal = {Przeglad Organizacji (1994)}, pages = {24 -- 27}, year = {1994}, language = {en} } @article{GoedhuysJanzMohnen2014, author = {Goedhuys, Micheline and Janz, Norbert and Mohnen, Pierre}, title = {Knowledge-based productivity in "low-tech" industries: evidence from firms in developing countries}, series = {Industrial and corporate change}, volume = {23}, journal = {Industrial and corporate change}, number = {1}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {1464-3650 (E-Journal); 0960-6491 (Print)}, doi = {10.1093/icc/dtt006}, pages = {1 -- 23}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Using firm-level data from five developing countries—Brazil, Ecuador, South Africa, Tanzania, and Bangladesh—and three industries—food processing, textiles, and the garments and leather products—this article examines the importance of various sources of knowledge for explaining productivity and formally tests whether sector- or country-specific characteristics dominate these relationships. Knowledge sources driving productivity appear mainly sector specific. Also differences in the level of development affect the effectiveness of knowledge sources. In the food processing sector, firms with higher educated managers are more productive, and in least-developed countries, additionally those with technology licenses and imported machinery and equipment. In the capital-intensive textiles sector, productivity is higher in firms that conduct R\&D. In the garments and leather products sector, higher education of the managers, licensing, and R\&D raise productivity.}, language = {en} } @article{PietschmannRuhtz2001, author = {Pietschmann, Bernd P. and Ruhtz, Vanessa}, title = {Knowledge Management}, series = {Personal : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Human Resource Management. 53 (2001), H. 5}, journal = {Personal : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Human Resource Management. 53 (2001), H. 5}, isbn = {0031-5605}, pages = {242 -- 249}, year = {2001}, language = {en} } @article{KemptFreyerNagel2022, author = {Kempt, Hendrik and Freyer, Nils and Nagel, Saskia K.}, title = {Justice and the normative standards of explainability in healthcare}, series = {Philosophy \& Technology}, volume = {35}, journal = {Philosophy \& Technology}, number = {Article number: 100}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, doi = {10.1007/s13347-022-00598-0}, pages = {1 -- 19}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Providing healthcare services frequently involves cognitively demanding tasks, including diagnoses and analyses as well as complex decisions about treatments and therapy. From a global perspective, ethically significant inequalities exist between regions where the expert knowledge required for these tasks is scarce or abundant. One possible strategy to diminish such inequalities and increase healthcare opportunities in expert-scarce settings is to provide healthcare solutions involving digital technologies that do not necessarily require the presence of a human expert, e.g., in the form of artificial intelligent decision-support systems (AI-DSS). Such algorithmic decision-making, however, is mostly developed in resource- and expert-abundant settings to support healthcare experts in their work. As a practical consequence, the normative standards and requirements for such algorithmic decision-making in healthcare require the technology to be at least as explainable as the decisions made by the experts themselves. The goal of providing healthcare in settings where resources and expertise are scarce might come with a normative pull to lower the normative standards of using digital technologies in order to provide at least some healthcare in the first place. We scrutinize this tendency to lower standards in particular settings from a normative perspective, distinguish between different types of absolute and relative, local and global standards of explainability, and conclude by defending an ambitious and practicable standard of local relative explainability.}, language = {en} } @article{Moosdorf2009, author = {Moosdorf, Andreas}, title = {It's not just the Talent, it's the Knowledge Transfer Method}, series = {GC Ticker}, journal = {GC Ticker}, number = {1}, pages = {16 -- 16}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{Pietsch2007, author = {Pietsch, Wolfram}, title = {IT Service Deployment}, series = {QFD : transactions from International Symposium on QFD 2007 - Williamsburg, the Nineteenth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment ; September 7 - 8, 2007, Williamsburg, VA ; [companion document to the Thirteenth International and Nineteenth North American Symposium on Quality Function Deployment (ISQFD'07)] / [organized and hosted by the QFD Institute]}, journal = {QFD : transactions from International Symposium on QFD 2007 - Williamsburg, the Nineteenth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment ; September 7 - 8, 2007, Williamsburg, VA ; [companion document to the Thirteenth International and Nineteenth North American Symposium on Quality Function Deployment (ISQFD'07)] / [organized and hosted by the QFD Institute]}, publisher = {QFD Inst.}, address = {Ann Arbor, Mich.}, isbn = {1-889477-19-2}, pages = {203 -- 212}, year = {2007}, language = {en} } @article{Jacobs1999, author = {Jacobs, Stephan}, title = {Introducing Measurable Requirements: A Case Study}, series = {Proceedings : June 7 - 11, 1999, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland / sponsored by IEEE Computer Society Technical Council on Software Engineering. In cooperation with ACM SIGSOFT}, journal = {Proceedings : June 7 - 11, 1999, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland / sponsored by IEEE Computer Society Technical Council on Software Engineering. In cooperation with ACM SIGSOFT}, isbn = {0769501885}, year = {1999}, language = {en} } @article{EmhardtJarodzkaBrandGruweletal.2020, author = {Emhardt, Selina and Jarodzka, Halszka and Brand-Gruwel, Saskia and Drumm, Christian and Gog, Tamara van}, title = {Introducing eye movement modeling examples for programming education and the role of teacher's didactic guidance}, series = {ETRA '20 Short Papers: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications}, journal = {ETRA '20 Short Papers: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications}, number = {Art. 52}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {New York}, doi = {10.1145/3379156.3391978}, pages = {1 -- 4}, year = {2020}, abstract = {In this article, we introduce how eye-tracking technology might become a promising tool to teach programming skills, such as debugging with 'Eye Movement Modeling Examples' (EMME). EMME are tutorial videos that visualize an expert's (e.g., a programming teacher's) eye movements during task performance to guide students' attention, e.g., as a moving dot or circle. We first introduce the general idea behind the EMME method and present studies that showed first promising results regarding the benefits of EMME to support programming education. However, we argue that the instructional design of EMME varies notably across them, as evidence-based guidelines on how to create effective EMME are often lacking. As an example, we present our ongoing research on the effects of different ways to instruct the EMME model prior to video creation. Finally, we highlight open questions for future investigations that could help improving the design of EMME for (programming) education.}, language = {en} } @article{Janz2002, author = {Janz, Norbert}, title = {Innovative Power of German Manufacturing Industry Slows Down}, series = {ZEW news. English edition. 4 (2002), H. 2002}, journal = {ZEW news. English edition. 4 (2002), H. 2002}, pages = {5 -- 5}, year = {2002}, language = {en} } @article{Janz2001, author = {Janz, Norbert}, title = {Innovations in Germany: Market Novelties Gain Greater Importance}, series = {ZEW news. English edition (2001)}, journal = {ZEW news. English edition (2001)}, pages = {3 -- 3}, year = {2001}, language = {en} } @article{Hoepner2004, author = {Hoepner, Gert}, title = {Info-Web-Generation}, series = {Dm-compact : academic news for marketeers / Deutscher Direktmarketing Verband e. V.. 2 (2004), H. 3-4}, journal = {Dm-compact : academic news for marketeers / Deutscher Direktmarketing Verband e. V.. 2 (2004), H. 3-4}, isbn = {1573-3181}, pages = {14 -- 20}, year = {2004}, language = {en} } @article{Grap2007, author = {Grap, Rolf Dietmar}, title = {If you think, education is expensive, try incompetence}, series = {Beschaffung aktuell (2007)}, journal = {Beschaffung aktuell (2007)}, isbn = {0341-4507}, pages = {62 -- 63}, year = {2007}, language = {en} } @article{GoergensGreubelMoosdorf2013, author = {G{\"o}rgens, Stefan and Greubel, Steffen and Moosdorf, Andreas}, title = {How to mobilize 20,000 people: Perspectives on retail and consumer goods}, pages = {52 -- 58}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @article{KlettkeHomburgGell2015, author = {Klettke, Tanja and Homburg, Carsten and Gell, Sebastian}, title = {How to measure analyst forecast effort}, series = {European Accounting Review}, volume = {24}, journal = {European Accounting Review}, number = {1}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, address = {London}, issn = {0963-8180}, doi = {10.1080/09638180.2014.909291}, pages = {129 -- 146}, year = {2015}, abstract = {We introduce a new way to measure the forecast effort that analysts devote to their earnings forecasts by measuring the analyst's general effort for all covered firms. While the commonly applied effort measure is based on analyst behaviour for one firm, our measure considers analyst behaviour for all covered firms. Our general effort measure captures additional information about analyst effort and thus can identify accurate forecasts. We emphasise the importance of investigating analyst behaviour in a larger context and argue that analysts who generally devote substantial forecast effort are also likely to devote substantial effort to a specific firm, even if this effort might not be captured by a firm-specific measure. Empirical results reveal that analysts who devote higher general forecast effort issue more accurate forecasts. Additional investigations show that analysts' career prospects improve with higher general forecast effort. Our measure improves on existing methods as it has higher explanatory power regarding differences in forecast accuracy than the commonly applied effort measure. Additionally, it can address research questions that cannot be examined with a firm-specific measure. It provides a simple but comprehensive way to identify accurate analysts.}, language = {en} } @article{EggertKling2023, author = {Eggert, Mathias and Kling, Rene}, title = {How to distribute charging requests of electronic vehicles? A reservation-based approach}, series = {International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research}, volume = {21}, journal = {International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research}, number = {2023}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin, Heidelberg, New York}, issn = {1868-8659}, doi = {10.1007/s13177-023-00367-z}, pages = {437 -- 460}, year = {2023}, abstract = {The number of electronic vehicles increase steadily while the space for extending the charging infrastructure is limited. In particular in urban areas, where parking spaces in attractive areas are famous, opportunities to setup new charging stations is very limited. This leads to an overload of some very attractive charging stations and an underutilization of less attractive ones. Against this background, the paper at hand presents the design of an e-vehicle reservation system that aims at distributing the utilization of the charging infrastructure, particularly in urban areas. By applying a design science approach, the requirements for a reservation-based utilization approach are elicited and a model for a suitable distribution approach and its instantiation are developed. The artefact is evaluated by simulating the distribution effects based on data of real charging station utilizations.}, language = {en} } @article{DrummEmhardtKoketal.2020, author = {Drumm, Christian and Emhardt, Selina N. and Kok, Ellen M. and Jarodzka, Halzka and Brand-Gruwel, Saskia and van Gog, Tamara}, title = {How Experts Adapt Their Gaze Behavior When Modeling a Task to Novices}, series = {Cognitive science}, volume = {44}, journal = {Cognitive science}, number = {9}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Weinheim}, issn = {1551-6709}, doi = {10.1111/cogs.12893}, pages = {26}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Domain experts regularly teach novice students how to perform a task. This often requires them to adjust their behavior to the less knowledgeable audience and, hence, to behave in a more didactic manner. Eye movement modeling examples (EMMEs) are a contemporary educational tool for displaying experts' (natural or didactic) problem-solving behavior as well as their eye movements to learners. While research on expert-novice communication mainly focused on experts' changes in explicit, verbal communication behavior, it is as yet unclear whether and how exactly experts adjust their nonverbal behavior. This study first investigated whether and how experts change their eye movements and mouse clicks (that are displayed in EMMEs) when they perform a task naturally versus teach a task didactically. Programming experts and novices initially debugged short computer codes in a natural manner. We first characterized experts' natural problem-solving behavior by contrasting it with that of novices. Then, we explored the changes in experts' behavior when being subsequently instructed to model their task solution didactically. Experts became more similar to novices on measures associated with experts' automatized processes (i.e., shorter fixation durations, fewer transitions between code and output per click on the run button when behaving didactically). This adaptation might make it easier for novices to follow or imitate the expert behavior. In contrast, experts became less similar to novices for measures associated with more strategic behavior (i.e., code reading linearity, clicks on run button) when behaving didactically.}, language = {en} } @article{SchuhGottschalkHoehne2007, author = {Schuh, G. and Gottschalk, S. and H{\"o}hne, Tim}, title = {High Resolution Production Management}, series = {CIRP Annals}, volume = {56}, journal = {CIRP Annals}, number = {1}, issn = {0007-8506}, doi = {10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.105}, pages = {439 -- 442}, year = {2007}, language = {en} } @article{PietschTaudes1994, author = {Pietsch, Wolfram and Taudes, A.}, title = {Groupware Support for Interorganizational Courseware-Development. A Case Study / Pietsch, W. , Taudes, A.}, series = {IM : die Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r Information Management \& Consulting (1994)}, journal = {IM : die Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r Information Management \& Consulting (1994)}, isbn = {0930-5181, 1616-1017}, pages = {12 -- 18}, year = {1994}, language = {en} } @article{JacobsHolten1995, author = {Jacobs, Stephan and Holten, Roland}, title = {Goal Driven Business Modelling - Supporting Decision Making within Information System Development}, series = {Conference on Organizational Computing Systems : August 13 - 16, 1995, Milpitas, Calif. / general ed. Nora Comstock ...}, journal = {Conference on Organizational Computing Systems : August 13 - 16, 1995, Milpitas, Calif. / general ed. Nora Comstock ...}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {New York, NY}, isbn = {0-89791-706-5}, pages = {III, 353 S. : graph. Darst.}, year = {1995}, language = {en} } @article{BeckerDelfmannEggertetal.2012, author = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Delfmann, Patrick and Eggert, Mathias and Schwittay, Sebastian}, title = {Generalizability and Applicability of Model-Based Business Process Compliance-Checking Approaches — A State-of-the-Art Analysis and Research Roadmap}, series = {Business Research : BuR}, volume = {5}, journal = {Business Research : BuR}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {1866-8658}, doi = {10.1007/BF03342739}, pages = {221 -- 247}, year = {2012}, abstract = {With a steady increase of regulatory requirements for business processes, automation support of compliance management is a field garnering increasing attention in Information Systems research. Several approaches have been developed to support compliance checking of process models. One major challenge for such approaches is their ability to handle different modeling techniques and compliance rules in order to enable widespread adoption and application. Applying a structured literature search strategy, we reflect and discuss compliance-checking approaches in order to provide an insight into their generalizability and evaluation. The results imply that current approaches mainly focus on special modeling techniques and/or a restricted set of types of compliance rules. Most approaches abstain from real-world evaluation which raises the question of their practical applicability. Referring to the search results, we propose a roadmap for further research in model-based business process compliance checking.}, language = {en} }