@inproceedings{Fuchs2007,
  author    = {Fuchs, Lothar},
  title     = {Abflusssteuerung in der Stadtentw{\"a}sserung},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {Dr.-Ing. Lothar Fuchs vom itwh Hannover mit 13 Seiten (S. 57-69) Beitrag zum 1. Aachener Softwaretag in der Wasserwirtschaft <1, 2007, Aachen> Zusammenfassung [des Autors] Die wesentlichen technischen Probleme der Kanalnetzbewirtschaftung sind gel{\"o}st. Der Markt bietet bew{\"a}hrte Messger{\"a}te, Steuerungseinrichtungen, Daten{\"u}bertragungs-, Regler- und Rechnersysteme, die sich f{\"u}r den Einsatz in der Stadtentw{\"a}sserung eignen. Mit den heute existierenden Simulationsmodellen k{\"o}nnen die Auswirkungen von Bewirtschaftungssystemen abgesch{\"a}tzt werden, bevor diese implementiert werden. Die f{\"u}r Bewirtschaftungssysteme notwendige Ausr{\"u}stung ist eine andere, als die traditionell in der Stadtentw{\"a}sserung {\"u}bliche. Sie erfordert in jedem Fall mehr und teureren Wartungsaufwand sowie anders ausgebildetes Personal. Bei einem Kostenvergleich mit konventionellen (d.h. ungesteuerten) Systemen muß die umfassende Information und Kontrolle des bewirtschafteten Systems ber{\"u}cksichtigt werden. Die permanente Information {\"u}ber den Betriebszustand sowie die in allen existierenden Bewirtschaftungssystemen erreichten Verminderungen von Regenentlastungen und (in geringerem Maße) hydraulischen {\"U}berlastungen lassen es geraten erscheinen, Kanalnetzbewirtschaftung nicht nur unter dem Gesichtspunkt der h{\"o}heren Betriebskosten, sondern auch denen der m{\"o}glich Einsparungen von Investitionen und der h{\"o}heren Effizienz zu beurteilen. Analog l{\"a}sst sich zeigen, dass bewirtschaftete Systeme kleiner ausgelegt werden k{\"o}nnen und dennoch die gleiche Effizienz besitzen wie gr{\"o}ßer dimensionierte, statisch wirkende Systeme.},
  subject      = {Wasserbau},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{FrotscherStaat2015,
  author    = {Frotscher, Ralf and Staat, Manfred},
  title     = {Homogenization of a cardiac tissue construct},
  series = {CMBE15 : 4th International Conference on Computational \& Mathematical Biomedical Engineering ; 29th June - 1st July 2015 ; {\´E}cole Normale Sup{\´e}rieure de Cachan ; Cachan (Paris), France},
  booktitle = {CMBE15 : 4th International Conference on Computational \& Mathematical Biomedical Engineering ; 29th June - 1st July 2015 ; {\´E}cole Normale Sup{\´e}rieure de Cachan ; Cachan (Paris), France},
  editor    = {Nithiarasu, Perumal},
  publisher = {CMBE},
  address   = {[s.l.]},
  issn      = {2227-9385},
  pages     = {645 -- 648},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FrotscherKochRaatschenetal.2014,
  author    = {Frotscher, Ralf and Koch, Jan-Peter and Raatschen, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and Staat, Manfred},
  title     = {Evaluation of a computational model for drug action on cardiac tissue},
  series = {11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM XI) ; 5th European Conference on Computational Mechanics (ECCM V) ; 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECFD VI) ; July 20 - 25, 2014, Barcelona},
  booktitle = {11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM XI) ; 5th European Conference on Computational Mechanics (ECCM V) ; 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECFD VI) ; July 20 - 25, 2014, Barcelona},
  editor    = {Onate, E.},
  organization    = {World Congress on Computational Mechanics <11, 2014, Barcelona>},
  pages     = {1 -- 12},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FrotscherDuongStaat2015,
  author    = {Frotscher, Ralf and Duong, Minh Tuan and Staat, Manfred},
  title     = {Simulating beating cardiomyocytes with electromechanical coupling},
  series = {II. International Conference on Biomedical Technology : 28-30 October 2015 Hannover, Germany / T. Lenarz, P. Wriggers (Eds.)},
  booktitle = {II. International Conference on Biomedical Technology : 28-30 October 2015 Hannover, Germany / T. Lenarz, P. Wriggers (Eds.)},
  organization    = {International Conference on Biomedical Technology <2, 2015, Hannover>},
  pages     = {1 -- 2},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKreinHaunert2008,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus and Haunert, Martina},
  title     = {Assessing the effectiveness of price cap regimes for the regulation of fixed telephony markets: has it been successful in achieving competition? : preliminary draft / by Markus Fredebeul-Krein and Martina Haunert. 19th European Regional ITS Conference of the International Telecommunications Society, September 17-19, 2008 Rome, Italy},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {1. Introduction 2. Tariff regulation, rebalancing and price caps 3. Price cap regimes in selected European countries 4. Has price cap regulation been successful? 5. Regulatory implications for other countries},
  subject      = {Telekommunikationsmarkt},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKrein2008,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus},
  title     = {Die Liberalisierung des deutschen Telekommunikationsmarktes: Vorbild f{\"u}r andere Sektoren? : Vortrag am Institut f{\"u}r Wirtschaftspolitik der Universit{\"a}t zu K{\"o}ln, 3. November 2008, K{\"o}ln},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Regulierung des deutschen Telekommunikationsmarktes Wettbewerb auf dem deutschen Telekommunikationsmarkt},
  subject      = {Telekommunikationsmarkt},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKrein2008,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus},
  title     = {Time for revision: The regulation of Germany's next generation networks in the light of new economic and technological challenges on telecom markets : Presentation for the 18th Biennial conference of the International Telecommunications Society, June 24-27, 2008 Montreal, Canada},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {On 1st January 1998, the German telecom market was fully liberalised. Since then genuine competition between market participants has developed, based on a comprehensive legal and regulatory framework that provides for safeguards against unfair competition and market power by Deutsche Telekom. Today, about 10 years after the liberalisation of the telecommunications sector a revision of this regulatory approach has become necessary because at least on three dimensions the situation is quite different from the one 10 years ago: First, with numerous established alternative operators in the market monopolies have been successfully challenged and competition introduced. Second, not only is Cable TV becoming in large parts of Germany a viable alternative for the provision of broadband services but also mobile services are becoming increasingly a substitute for fixed services. Last but not least there are important technological changes under way, requiring huge investments in infrastructure upgrades for next generation networks. In the light of these new developments the question is to which extent the current regulatory approach of severe ex-ante regulatory intervention is still appropriate. Is any part of the network of the former incumbent still a bottleneck? A more light handed regulatory approach might be the right response to this new situation. The paper is organised as follows: The first section will briefly examine the economic rationale for regulating network access. Based on the assumption that regulation is always necessary when bottlenecks exist regulatory principles for an efficient network access regime will be derived. The second section compares the situation of the German market in early 1998 with the one of today. Thereby three dimensions will be considered: the degree of competition, the potential for substitution and technological developments. The third section will define some requirements for the future regulation of telecom markets. Proposals will be elaborated how to ensure competitive telecom markets in the light of new economic and technological challenges.},
  subject      = {Telekommunikationsmarkt},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKrein2009,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus},
  title     = {Encouraging competition and investment into next generation access networks: The case of long term risk sharing contracts},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {Working paper distributed at 2nd Annual Next Generation Telecommunications Conference 2009, 13th - 14th October 2009, Brussels 14 pages Abstract Governments all over Europe are in the process of adopting new broadband strategies. The objective is to create modern telecommunications networks based on powerful broadband infrastructures". In doing so, they aim for innovative and investment-friendly concepts. For instance, in a recently published consultation paper on the subject the German regulator BNetzA declared that it will take "greater account of … reducing risks, securing the investment and innovation power, providing planning certainty and transparency - in order to support and advance broadband rollout in Germany". It further states that when regulating wholesale rates it has to be ensured that "… adequate incentives for network rollout are provided on the one hand, while sustainable and fair competition is ensured on the other". Also an EC draft recommendation on regulated network access is about to set new standards for the regulation of next generation access networks. According to the recommendation the prices of new assets shall be based on costs plus a projectspecific risk premium to be included in the costs of capital for the investment risk incurred by the operator. This approach has been criticised from various sides. In particular it has been questioned whether such an approach is adequate to meet the objectives of encouraging both competition and investment into next generation access networks. Against this background, the concept of "long term risk sharing contracts" has been proposed recently as an approach which does not only incorporate the various additional risks involved in the deployment of NGA infrastructure, but has several other advantages. This paper will demonstrate that the concept allows for competition to evolve at both the retail and wholesale level on fair, objective, non-discriminatory and transparent terms and conditions. Moreover, it ensures the highest possible investment incentive in line with socially desirable outcome. The paper is organised as follows: The next section will briefly outline the importance of encouraging competition and investment in an NGA-environment. The third section will specify the design of long term risk sharing contracts in view of achieving these objectives. The fourth section will examine potential problems associated with the concept. In doing so a way of how to deal with them will be elaborated. The last section will look at arguments against long term risk sharing contracts. It will be shown that these arguments are not strong enough to build a case against introducing such contracts.},
  subject      = {Electronic Commerce},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKrein2008,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus},
  title     = {Die globale Finanzkrise: Ursachen und Bew{\"a}ltigung : Vortrag an der Georg-Simon-Ohm-Schule K{\"o}ln, 2. Dezember 2008, K{\"o}ln},
  organization    = {FH Aachen, University of Applied Sciences},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {- Wie kam es zu der globalen Finanzkrise? - Wodurch zeichnet sich die Finanzkrise aus? - Wer hat die Finanzkrise verschuldet? - Welche Rolle spielten Spekulanten? - Inwiefern ist die Finanzkrise selbstverschuldet? - Ist die Globalisierung Schuld an den Finanzkrisen in zahlreichen Regionen dieser Welt? - Wie wirkt sich die Finanzkrise auf die Realwirtschaft aus? - Welche Wege bieten sich, aus der Krise herauszukommen?},
  subject      = {Finanzkrise},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKrein2006,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus},
  title     = {Developing competitive broadband markets: Lessons learnt from German and European regulatory approaches on broad-band access},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {A key feature of future broadband markets will be diversity of access technologies, meaning that numerous technologies will be exploited for broadband communication. Various factors will affect the success of these future broadband markets, the regulatory policy being one amongst others. So far, a coherent regulatory approach does not exist as to broadband markets. First results of policies so far suggest that less sector-specific regulation is likely to occur. Instead, regulators must ensure that access to networks and services of potentially dominant providers in a relevant broadband market will satisfy requirements for openness and non-discrimination. In this environment the future challenge of regulationg broadband markets will be to set the right incentives for investment into new infrastructures. This paper examines whether there is a need for the regulation of future broadband access markets an if yes, what is the appropriate regulatory tool to do so. Thereby the focus is on the analysis of European broadband markets and the regulatory approaches applied. The first section provides a description of the characteristics of future broadband markets. The second section discusses possible bottlenecks on broadband markets an their regulatory implications. The third section will examine regulatory issues concerning access to broadband networks in more detail. This will be done by comparing the regulatory approaches of European countries and the results in terms of bradband penetration. The final section will give key recommendations for a regulatory strategy on brandband access markets.},
  subject      = {Telekommunikationsmarkt},
  language  = {en}
}