@article{GoettenHavermannBraunetal.2019,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Gomez, Francisco and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {RANS Simulation Validation of a Small Sensor Turret for UAVs},
  series = {Journal of Aerospace Engineering},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Journal of Aerospace Engineering},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {ASCE},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1943-5525},
  doi       = {10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001055},
  pages     = {Article number 04019060},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Recent Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) design procedures rely on full aircraft steady-state Reynolds-Averaged-Navier-Stokes (RANS) analyses in early design stages. Small sensor turrets are included in such simulations, even though their aerodynamic properties show highly unsteady behavior. Very little is known about the effects of this approach on the simulation outcomes of small turrets. Therefore, the flow around a model turret at a Reynolds number of 47,400 is simulated with a steady-state RANS approach and compared to experimental data. Lift, drag, and surface pressure show good agreement with the experiment. The RANS model predicts the separation location too far downstream and shows a larger recirculation region aft of the body. Both characteristic arch and horseshoe vortex structures are visualized and qualitatively match the ones found by the experiment. The Reynolds number dependence of the drag coefficient follows the trend of a sphere within a distinct range. The outcomes indicate that a steady-state RANS model of a small sensor turret is able to give results that are useful for UAV engineering purposes but might not be suited for detailed insight into flow properties.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PoghossianGeisslerSchoening2019,
  author    = {Poghossian, Arshak and Geissler, Hanno and Sch{\"o}ning, Michael Josef},
  title     = {Rapid methods and sensors for milk quality monitoring and spoilage detection},
  series = {Biosensors and Bioelectronics},
  volume    = {140},
  journal   = {Biosensors and Bioelectronics},
  number    = {Article 111272},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0956-5663},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.bios.2019.04.040},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{GebhardtHoetter2019,
  author    = {Gebhardt, Andreas and Hoetter, Jan-Steffen},
  title     = {Rapid Tooling},
  series = {CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering},
  booktitle = {CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin, Heidelberg},
  isbn      = {978-3-662-53120-4},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-662-53120-4},
  pages     = {39 -- 52},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Olbertz2019,
  author    = {Olbertz, Klaus},
  title     = {Rechtssichere Vereinbarungen von K{\"u}ndigungsfristen im Arbeitsvertrag : Weitestgehende Abdingbarkeit gesetzlicher Vorgaben erm{\"o}glicht passgenaue Gestaltungen},
  series = {NWB - Steuer- und Wirtschaftsrecht},
  journal   = {NWB - Steuer- und Wirtschaftsrecht},
  number    = {23},
  issn      = {0028-3460},
  pages     = {1693 -- 1699},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{ZingsheimGrimmerOrtneretal.2019,
  author    = {Zingsheim, Jonas and Grimmer, Timo and Ortner, Marion and Schmaderer, Christoph and Hauser, Christine and Kotliar, Konstantin},
  title     = {Recognition of subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by the use of retinal arterial vessels.},
  series = {3rd YRA MedTech Symposium 2019 : May 24 / 2019 / FH Aachen},
  booktitle = {3rd YRA MedTech Symposium 2019 : May 24 / 2019 / FH Aachen},
  editor    = {Staat, Manfred and Erni, Daniel},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Duisburg-Essen},
  address   = {Duisburg},
  organization    = {MedTech Symposium},
  isbn      = {978-3-940402-22-6},
  doi       = {10.17185/duepublico/48750},
  pages     = {36 -- 37},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CapriMorsianiSantoroetal.2019,
  author    = {Capri, Miriam and Morsiani, Cristina and Santoro, Aurelia and Moriggi, Manuela and Conte, Maria and Martucci, Morena and Bellavista, Elena and Fabbri, Cristina and Giampieri, Enrico and Albracht, Kirsten and Fl{\"u}ck, Martin and Ruoss, Severin and Brocca, Lorenza and Canepari, Monica and Longa, Emanuela and Giulio, Irene Di and Bottinelli, Roberto and Cerretelli, Paolo and Salvioli, Stefano and Gelfi, Cecilia and Franceschi, Claudio and Narici, Marco and Rittweger, J{\"o}rn},
  title     = {Recovery from 6-month spaceflight at the International Space Station: muscle-related stress into a proinflammatory setting},
  series = {The FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology},
  volume    = {33},
  journal   = {The FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1096/fj.201801625R},
  pages     = {5168 -- 5180},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Golland2019,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Reichweite des "Joint Controllership": Neue Fragen der gemeinsamen Verantwortlichkeit},
  series = {K\&R Kommunikation \& Recht},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {K\&R Kommunikation \& Recht},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {dfv Mediengruppe, Deutscher Fachverlag GmbH},
  address   = {Frankfurt am Main},
  issn      = {1434-6354},
  pages     = {533 -- 537},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Kein Urteil zum Datenschutzrecht sorgte im vergangenen Jahr f{\"u}r mehr panische Reaktionen als die Entscheidung des EuGH in der Rechtssache "Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein"(C-210/16). Das Urteil warf in datenschutzrechtlicher Literatur und {\"O}ffentlichkeit zahlreiche Fragen auf: Ist jetzt jeder "gemeinsam" Verantwortlicher? Was sind die Kriterien? Der EuGH hat k{\"u}rzlich in einem - dem allgemeinen Vernehmen nach aufsehenerregenden, de facto aber kaum {\"u}berraschenden - Urteil f{\"u}r Klarheit gesorgt. Dabei hat das Gericht jedoch einige Fragen offengelassen und neue Fragen aufgeworfen. Ein Blick auf alte und neue Herausforderungen in Kooperationsszenarien.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{QuittmannAbelAlbrachtetal.2019,
  author    = {Quittmann, Oliver J. and Abel, Thomas and Albracht, Kirsten and Str{\"u}der, Heiko K.},
  title     = {Reliability of muscular activation patterns and their alterations during incremental handcycling in able-bodied participants},
  series = {Sports Biomechanics},
  journal   = {Sports Biomechanics},
  number    = {Article in press},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1752-6116},
  doi       = {10.1080/14763141.2019.1593496},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GrundmannBauerBodenetal.2019,
  author    = {Grundmann, Jan Thimo and Bauer, Waldemar and Boden, Ralf Christian and Ceriotti, Matteo and Cordero, Federico and Dachwald, Bernd and Dumont, Etienne and Grimm, Christian D. and Hercik, D. and Herique, A. and Ho, Tra-Mi and Jahnke, Rico and Kofman, Wlodek and Lange, Caroline and Lichtenheldt, Roy and McInnes, Colin R. and Mikschl, Tobias and Montenegro, Sergio and Moore, Iain and Pelivan, Ivanka and Peloni, Alessandro and Plettenmeier, Dirk and Quantius, Dominik and Reershemius, Siebo and Renger, Thomas and Riemann, Johannes and Rogez, Yves and Ruffer, Michael and Sasaki, Kaname and Schmitz, Nicole and Seboldt, Wolfgang and Seefeldt, Patric and Spietz, Peter and Spr{\"o}witz, Tom and Sznajder, Maciej and Toth, Norbert and Viavattene, Giulia and Wejmo, Elisabet and Wolff, Friederike and Ziach, Christian},
  title     = {Responsive exploration and asteroid characterization through integrated solar sail and lander development using small spacecraft technologies},
  series = {IAA Planetary Defense Conference},
  booktitle = {IAA Planetary Defense Conference},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {In parallel to the evolution of the Planetary Defense Conference, the exploration of small solar system bodies has advanced from fast fly-bys on the sidelines of missions to the planets to the implementation of dedicated sample-return and in-situ analysis missions. Spacecraft of all sizes have landed, touch-and-go sampled, been gently beached, or impacted at hypervelocity on asteroid and comet surfaces. More have flown by close enough to image their surfaces in detail or sample their immediate environment, often as part of an extended or re-purposed mission. And finally, full-scale planetary defense experiment missions are in the making. Highly efficient low-thrust propulsion is increasingly applied beyond commercial use also in mainstream and flagship science missions, in combination with gravity assist propulsion. Another development in the same years is the growth of small spacecraft solutions, not in size but in numbers and individual capabilities. The on-going NASA OSIRIS-REx and JAXA HAYABUSA2 missions exemplify the trend as well as the upcoming NEA SCOUT mission or the landers MINERVA-II and MASCOT recently deployed on Ryugu. We outline likely as well as possible and efficient routes of continuation of all these developments towards a propellant-less and highly efficient class of spacecraft for small solar system body exploration: small spacecraft solar sails designed for carefree handling and equipped with carried landers and application modules, for all asteroid user communities -planetary science, planetary defence, and in-situ resource utilization. This projection builds on the experience gained in the development of deployable membrane structures leading up to the successful ground deployment test of a (20 m)² solar sail at DLR Cologne and in the 20 years since. It draws on the background of extensive trajectory optimization studies, the qualified technology of the DLR GOSSAMER-1 deployment demonstrator, and the MASCOT asteroid lander. These enable 'now-term' as well as near-term hardware solutions, and thus responsive fast-paced development. Mission types directly applicable to planetary defense include: single and Multiple NEA Rendezvous ((M)NR) for mitigation precursor, target monitoring and deflection follow-up tasks; sail-propelled head-on retrograde kinetic impactors (RKI) for mitigation; and deployable membrane based methods to modify the asteroid's properties or interact with it. The DLR-ESTEC GOSSAMER Roadmap initiated studies of missions uniquely feasible with solar sails such as Displaced L1 (DL1) space weather advance warning and monitoring and Solar Polar Orbiter (SPO) delivery which demonstrate the capability of near-term solar sails to achieve NEA rendezvous in any kind of orbit, from Earth-coorbital to extremely inclined and even retrograde orbits. For those mission types using separable payloads, such as SPO, (M)NR and RKI, design concepts can be derived from the separable Boom Sail Deployment Units characteristic of DLR GOSSAMER solar sail technology, nanolanders like MASCOT, or microlanders like the JAXA-DLR Jupiter Trojan Asteroid Lander for the OKEANOS mission which can shuttle from the sail to the asteroids visited and enable multiple NEA sample-return missions. These are an ideal match for solar sails in micro-spacecraft format whose launch configurations are compatible with ESPA and ASAP secondary payload platforms.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GrundmannBauerBodenetal.2019,
  author    = {Grundmann, Jan Thimo and Bauer, Waldemar and Boden, Ralf Christian and Ceriotti, Matteo and Cordero, Federico and Dachwald, Bernd and Dumont, Etienne and Grimm, Christian D. and Hercik, D. and Herique, A. and Ho, Tra-Mi and Jahnke, Rico and Kofman, Wlodek and Lange, Caroline and Lichtenheldt, Roy and McInnes, Colin R. and Mikschl, Tobias and Mikulz, Eugen and Montenegro, Sergio and Moore, Iain and Pelivan, Ivanka and Peloni, Alessandro and Plettemeier, Dirk and Quantius, Dominik and Reershemius, Siebo and Renger, Thomas and Riemann, Johannes and Rogez, Yves and Ruffer, Michael and Sasaki, Kaname and Schmitz, Nicole and Seboldt, Wolfgang and Seefeldt, Patric and Spietz, Peter and Spr{\"o}witz, Tom and Sznajder, Maciej and Toth, Norbert and Viavattene, Giulia and Wejmo, Elisabet and Wolff, Friederike and Ziach, Christian},
  title     = {Responsive integrated small spacecraft solar sail and payload design concepts and missions},
  series = {Conference: 5th International Symposium on Solar Sailing (ISSS 2019)},
  booktitle = {Conference: 5th International Symposium on Solar Sailing (ISSS 2019)},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Asteroid mining has the potential to greatly reduce the cost of in-space manufacturing, production of propellant for space transportation and consumables for crewed spacecraft, compared to launching the required resources from Earth's deep gravity well. This paper discusses the top-level mission architecture and trajectory design for these resource-return missions, comparing high-thrust trajectories with continuous low-thrust solar-sail trajectories. This work focuses on maximizing the economic Net Present Value, which takes the time-cost of finance into account and therefore balances the returned resource mass and mission duration. The different propulsion methods will then be compared in terms of maximum economic return, sets of attainable target asteroids, and mission flexibility. This paper provides one more step towards making commercial asteroid mining an economically viable reality by integrating trajectory design, propulsion technology and economic modelling.},
  language  = {en}
}