@article{HeinkeKnickerAlbracht2018,
  author    = {Heinke, Lars N. and Knicker, Axel J. and Albracht, Kirsten},
  title     = {Evaluation of passively induced shoulder stretch reflex using an isokinetic dynamometer in male overhead athletes},
  series = {Isokinetics and Exercise Science},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Isokinetics and Exercise Science},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {IOS Press},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1878-5913},
  doi       = {10.3233/IES-184111},
  pages     = {265 -- 274},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {BACKGROUND: Muscle stretch reflexes are widely considered to beneficially influence joint stability and power generation in the lower limbs. While in the upper limbs and especially in the muscles surrounding the shoulder joint such evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the electromyographical response in the muscles crossing the shoulder of specifically trained overhead athletes to an anterior perturbation force. METHODS: Twenty healthy male participants performed six sets of different external shoulder rotation stretches on an isokinetic dynamometer over a range of amplitudes and muscle pre-activation moment levels. All stretches were applied with a dynamometer acceleration of 10,000∘/s2 and a velocity of 150∘/s. Electromyographical response was measured via sEMG. RESULTS: Consistent reflexes were not observed in all experimental conditions. The reflex latencies revealed a significant muscle main effect (F (2,228) = 99.31, p< 0.001; η2= 0.466; f= 0.934) and a pre-activation main effect (F (1,228) = 142.21, p< 0.001; η2= 0.384; f= 1.418). The stretch reflex amplitude yielded a significant pre-activation main effect (F (1,222) = 470.373, p< 0.001; η2= 0.679; f= 1.454). CONCLUSION: Short latency muscle reflexes showed a tendency to an anterior to posterior muscle recruitment whereby the main internal rotator muscles of the shoulder revealed the most consistent results.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LauraDrechslerErdtetal.2018,
  author    = {Laura, C.O. and Drechsler, Klaus and Erdt, M. and Wesarg, S. and Bale, R.},
  title     = {Intervention assessment tool for primary tumors in the liver},
  series = {Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2364-5504},
  doi       = {10.1515/cdbme-2018-0081},
  pages     = {337 -- 340},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {After a liver tumor intervention the medical doctor has to compare both pre and postoperative CT acquisitions to ensure that all carcinogenic cells are destroyed. A correct assessment of the intervention is of vital importance, since it will reduce the probability of tumor recurrence. Some methods have been proposed to support the medical doctors during the assessment process, however, all of them focus on secondary tumors. In this paper a tool is presented that enables the outcome validation for both primary and secondary tumors. Therefore, a multiphase registration (preoperative arterial and portal phases) followed by a registration between the pre and postoperative CT images is carried out. The first registration is in charge of the primary tumors that are only visible in the arterial phase. The secondary tumors will be incorporated in the second registration step. Finally, the part of the tumor that was not covered by the necrosis is quantified and visualized. The method has been tested in 9 patients, with an average registration error of 1.41 mm.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BronderPoghossianJessingetal.2019,
  author    = {Bronder, Thomas and Poghossian, Arshak and Jessing, Max P. and Keusgen, Michael and Sch{\"o}ning, Michael Josef},
  title     = {Surface regeneration and reusability of label-free DNA biosensors based on weak polyelectrolyte-modified capacitive field-effect structures},
  series = {Biosensors and Bioelectronics},
  volume    = {126},
  journal   = {Biosensors and Bioelectronics},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0956-5663},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.bios.2018.11.019},
  pages     = {510 -- 517},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ArreolaKeusgenSchoening2019,
  author    = {Arreola, Julio and Keusgen, Michael and Sch{\"o}ning, Michael Josef},
  title     = {Toward an immobilization method for spore-based biosensors in oxidative environment},
  series = {Electrochimica Acta},
  volume    = {302},
  journal   = {Electrochimica Acta},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.electacta.2019.01.148},
  pages     = {394 -- 401},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JungStaat2019,
  author    = {Jung, Alexander and Staat, Manfred},
  title     = {Modeling and simulation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac tissue},
  series = {GAMM - Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {GAMM - Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {1522-2608},
  doi       = {10.1002/gamm.201900002},
  pages     = {11 Seiten},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{RichterBraunsteinStaeudleetal.2018,
  author    = {Richter, Charlotte and Braunstein, Bjoern and St{\"a}udle, Benjamin and Attias, Julia and Suess, Alexander and Weber, T. and Rittweger, Joern and Green, David A. and Albracht, Kirsten},
  title     = {In vivo fascicle length of the gastrocnemius muscle during walking in simulated martian gravity using two different body weight support devices},
  series = {23rd Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, Dublin, Irland},
  booktitle = {23rd Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, Dublin, Irland},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RichterBraunsteinWinnardetal.2017,
  author    = {Richter, Charlotte and Braunstein, Bjoern and Winnard, Andrew and Nasser, Mona and Weber, T.},
  title     = {Human Biomechanical and Cardiopulmonary Responses to Partial Gravity - A Systematic Review},
  series = {Frontiers in physiology},
  journal   = {Frontiers in physiology},
  number    = {8, article 583},
  doi       = {10.3389/fphys.2017.00583},
  pages     = {22 Seiten},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{BehbahaniRibleMoulinecetal.2015,
  author    = {Behbahani, Mehdi and Rible, Sebastian and Moulinec, Charles and Fournier, Yvan and Nicolai, Mike and Crosetto, Paolo},
  title     = {Simulation of the FDA Centrifugal Blood Pump Using High Performance Computing},
  series = {World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering},
  volume    = {9},
  booktitle = {World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering},
  number    = {5},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BalakirskiKotliarPaulyetal.2018,
  author    = {Balakirski, Galina and Kotliar, Konstantin and Pauly, Karolin J. and Krings, Laura K. and R{\"u}bben, Albert and Baron, Jens M. and Schmitt, Laurenz},
  title     = {Surgical Site Infections After Dermatologic Surgery in Immunocompromised Patients: A Single-Center Experience},
  series = {Dermatologic Surgery},
  journal   = {Dermatologic Surgery},
  number    = {44 (12)},
  publisher = {Wolters Kluwer},
  doi       = {10.1097/DSS.0000000000001615},
  pages     = {1525 -- 1536},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {BACKGROUND Immunosuppression is often considered as an indication for antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infections (SSI) while performing skin surgery. However, the data on the risk of developing SSI after dermatologic surgery in immunosuppressed patients are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients of the Department of Dermatology and Allergology at the University Hospital of RWTH Aachen in Aachen, Germany, who underwent hospitalization for a dermatologic surgery between June 2016 and January 2017 (6 months), were followed up after surgery until completion of the wound healing process. The follow-up addressed the occurrence of SSI and the need for systemic antibiotics after the operative procedure. Immunocompromised patients were compared with immunocompetent patients. The investigation was conducted as a retrospective analysis of patient records. RESULTS The authors performed 284 dermatologic surgeries in 177 patients. Nineteen percent (54/284) of the skin surgery was performed on immunocompromised patients. The most common indications for surgical treatment were nonmelanoma skin cancer and malignant melanomas. Surgical site infections occurred in 6.7\% (19/284) of the cases. In 95\% (18/19), systemic antibiotic treatment was needed. Twenty-one percent of all SSI (4/19) were seen in immunosuppressed patients. CONCLUSION According to the authors' data, immunosuppression does not represent a significant risk factor for SSI after dermatologic surgery. However, larger prospective studies are needed to make specific recommendations on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis while performing skin surgery in these patients. The available data on complications after dermatologic surgery have improved over the past years. Particularly, additional risk factors have been identified for surgical site infections (SSI). Purulent surgical sites, older age, involvement of head, neck, and acral regions, and also the involvement of less experienced surgeons have been reported to increase the risk of the SSI after dermatologic surgeries.1 In general, the incidence of SSI after skin surgery is considered to be low.1,2 However, antibiotics in dermatologic surgeries, especially in the perioperative setting, seem to be overused,3,4 particularly regarding developing antibiotic resistances and side effects. Immunosuppression has been recommended to be taken into consideration as an additional indication for antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent SSI after skin surgery in special cases.5,6 However, these recommendations do not specify the exact dermatologic surgeries, and were not specifically developed for dermatologic surgery patients and treatments, but adopted from other surgical fields.6 According to the survey conducted on American College of Mohs Surgery members in 2012, 13\% to 29\% of the surgeons administered antibiotic prophylaxis to immunocompromised patients to prevent SSI while performing dermatologic surgery on noninfected skin,3 although this was not recommended by Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology Advisory Statement. Indeed, the data on the risk of developing SSI after dermatologic surgery in immunosuppressed patients are limited. However, it is possible that due to the insufficient evidence on the risk of SSI occurrence in this patient group, dermatologic surgeons tend to overuse perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. To make specific recommendations on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in immunosuppressed patients in the field of skin surgery, more information about the incidence of SSI after dermatologic surgery in these patients is needed. The aim of this study was to fill this data gap by investigating whether there is an increased risk of SSI after skin surgery in immunocompromised patients compared with immunocompetent patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JayaramanMummidisettyLoeschetal.2019,
  author    = {Jayaraman, Chandrasekaran and Mummidisetty, Chaitanya Krishna and Loesch, Alexandra and Kaur, Sandi and Hoppe-Ludwig, Shenan and Staat, Manfred and Jayaraman, Arun},
  title     = {Postural and metabolic benefits of using a forearm support walker in older adults with impairments},
  series = {Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation},
  volume    = {Volume 100},
  journal   = {Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation},
  number    = {Issue 4},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0003-9993},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.001},
  pages     = {638 -- 647},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}