@article{MischkeNeussVollmert2008,
  author    = {Mischke, Winfried and Neuß, Frank and Vollmert, Daniel},
  title     = {Beweislast f{\"u}r die Voraussetzungen der Ger{\"a}te- und der Betreiberverg{\"u}tung nach \S 54a UrhG / Rechtsanw{\"a}lte Prof. Dr. Winfried Mischke, Dr. Frank Neuß und Dr. Daniel Vollmert, Aachen},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r die Anwaltspraxis (2008)},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r die Anwaltspraxis (2008)},
  isbn      = {0936-7292},
  pages     = {587 -- 590},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MischkeNeussVollmert2007,
  author    = {Mischke, Winfried and Neuß, Frank and Vollmert, Daniel},
  title     = {Ausgleich der vom Verbraucher gezogenen Nutzungen bei R{\"u}cktritt vom Kaufvertrag in der Lieferkette/ Prof. Dr. Winfried Mischke, Dr. Frank Neuß und Dr. Daniel Vollmert, alle Aachen},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das gesamte Schuldrecht. 6 (2007), H. 6},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das gesamte Schuldrecht. 6 (2007), H. 6},
  isbn      = {1619-7011},
  pages     = {217 -- 218},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MischkeNouvertne2005,
  author    = {Mischke, Winfried and Nouvertn{\´e}, Richard},
  title     = {Muss der Erbe dem Kreditinstitut, bei dem der Erblasser seine Anlagen unterh{\"a}lt, einen Erbschein vorlegen? Wer tr{\"a}gt das Risiko, wenn das Kreditinstitut an einen Scheinerben zahlt?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r die Steuer- und Erbrechtspraxis. 7 (2005)},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r die Steuer- und Erbrechtspraxis. 7 (2005)},
  isbn      = {1439-3182},
  pages     = {234 -- 239},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Moosdorf2009,
  author    = {Moosdorf, Andreas},
  title     = {It's not just the Talent, it's the Knowledge Transfer Method},
  series = {GC Ticker},
  journal   = {GC Ticker},
  number    = {1},
  pages     = {16 -- 16},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MuellerSeginWeigandetal.2022,
  author    = {Mueller, Tobias and Segin, Alexander and Weigand, Christoph and Schmitt, Robert H.},
  title     = {Feature selection for measurement models},
  series = {International journal of quality \& reliability management},
  journal   = {International journal of quality \& reliability management},
  number    = {Vol. ahead-of-print, No. ahead-of-print.},
  publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {0265-671X},
  doi       = {10.1108/IJQRM-07-2021-0245},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose In the determination of the measurement uncertainty, the GUM procedure requires the building of a measurement model that establishes a functional relationship between the measurand and all influencing quantities. Since the effort of modelling as well as quantifying the measurement uncertainties depend on the number of influencing quantities considered, the aim of this study is to determine relevant influencing quantities and to remove irrelevant ones from the dataset. Design/methodology/approach In this work, it was investigated whether the effort of modelling for the determination of measurement uncertainty can be reduced by the use of feature selection (FS) methods. For this purpose, 9 different FS methods were tested on 16 artificial test datasets, whose properties (number of data points, number of features, complexity, features with low influence and redundant features) were varied via a design of experiments. Findings Based on a success metric, the stability, universality and complexity of the method, two FS methods could be identified that reliably identify relevant and irrelevant influencing quantities for a measurement model. Originality/value For the first time, FS methods were applied to datasets with properties of classical measurement processes. The simulation-based results serve as a basis for further research in the field of FS for measurement models. The identified algorithms will be applied to real measurement processes in the future.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MoehrenBergmannJanseretal.2024,
  author    = {M{\"o}hren, Felix and Bergmann, Ole and Janser, Frank and Braun, Carsten},
  title     = {Assessment of structural mechanical effects related to torsional deformations of propellers},
  series = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  journal   = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wien},
  issn      = {1869-5590 (eISSN)},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13272-024-00737-7},
  pages     = {22 Seiten},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Lifting propellers are of increasing interest for Advanced Air Mobility. All propellers and rotors are initially twisted beams, showing significant extension-twist coupling and centrifugal twisting. Torsional deformations severely impact aerodynamic performance. This paper presents a novel approach to assess different reasons for torsional deformations. A reduced-order model runs large parameter sweeps with algebraic formulations and numerical solution procedures. Generic beams represent three different propeller types for General Aviation, Commercial Aviation, and Advanced Air Mobility. Simulations include solid and hollow cross-sections made of aluminum, steel, and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer. The investigation shows that centrifugal twisting moments depend on both the elastic and initial twist. The determination of the centrifugal twisting moment solely based on the initial twist suffers from errors exceeding 5\% in some cases. The nonlinear parts of the torsional rigidity do not significantly impact the overall torsional rigidity for the investigated propeller types. The extension-twist coupling related to the initial and elastic twist in combination with tension forces significantly impacts the net cross-sectional torsional loads. While the increase in torsional stiffness due to initial twist contributes to the overall stiffness for General and Commercial Aviation propellers, its contribution to the lift propeller's stiffness is limited. The paper closes with the presentation of approximations for each effect identified as significant. Numerical evaluations are necessary to determine each effect for inhomogeneous cross-sections made of anisotropic material.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Mueller2013,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, Thomas},
  title     = {Aufweichung der Gewaltenteilung und Demokratieverlust - Achtung vor dem Parlament. Darstellung einer Rechtsch{\"o}pfung der Exekutive im Umfeld des \S15 AStG},
  series = {Der Betrieb},
  journal   = {Der Betrieb},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {Fachmedien Otto Schmidt},
  address   = {D{\"u}sseldorf},
  issn      = {0005-9935},
  pages     = {542 -- 548},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Mueller2013,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, Thomas},
  title     = {Streitwertermittlung nach dem neuen \S 52 Abs. 3 S. 2 GKG - Auswirkungen auch bei der Besteuerung von Unternehmen},
  series = {Betriebs-Berater : BB},
  journal   = {Betriebs-Berater : BB},
  number    = {H. 42},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}ller},
  issn      = {0947-0581 (E-Journal); 0340-7918 (Print)},
  pages     = {2519 -- 2521},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Mueller2009,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, Thomas},
  title     = {Verfahrensrechtliche Fragen in Organschaftsf{\"a}llen},
  series = {Der Konzern : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Gesellschaftsrecht, Steuerrecht, Bilanzrecht und Rechnungslegung der verbundenen Unternehmen},
  journal   = {Der Konzern : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Gesellschaftsrecht, Steuerrecht, Bilanzrecht und Rechnungslegung der verbundenen Unternehmen},
  number    = {H. 3/4},
  issn      = {1611-2296},
  pages     = {167 -- 170},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Mueller2007,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, Thomas},
  title     = {Kosten eines finanzgerichtlichen Verfahrens},
  series = {Steuer-Journal},
  journal   = {Steuer-Journal},
  number    = {Sonderdr.},
  issn      = {1613-2882},
  pages     = {31 -- 33},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}