@misc{Golland2020, author = {Golland, Alexander}, title = {Immaterieller Schadensersatz f{\"u}r die Weiterleitung von Daten {\"u}ber ein berufsbezogenes soziales Netzwerk}, series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater}, volume = {44}, journal = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater}, number = {11}, publisher = {DFV Mediengruppe}, address = {Frankfurt a.M.}, issn = {0170-7256}, pages = {286 -- 288}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{Golland2023, author = {Golland, Alexander}, title = {Immaterieller Schadensersatz bei Datenschutzverst{\"o}ßen - EuGH tariert aus}, series = {NWB - Steuer- und Wirtschaftsrecht}, volume = {2023}, journal = {NWB - Steuer- und Wirtschaftsrecht}, number = {26}, publisher = {NWB Verlag}, address = {Herne}, issn = {0028-3460}, pages = {1845 -- 1845}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Umsatzbasierte Bußgelder - wie sonst nur aus dem Kartellrecht bekannt - waren einer der Gr{\"u}nde, warum die Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DSGVO) vor ihrem Inkrafttreten f{\"u}r erhebliches Aufsehen sorgte. Die vielfach relevanteren Schadensersatzanspr{\"u}che, die, wie bei „Dieselgate", aufgrund der Vielzahl von betroffenen Personen und der aus Sicht von Rechtsdienstleistern bestehenden Skalierbarkeit mit weitaus h{\"o}heren Einbußen f{\"u}r Unternehmen einhergehen k{\"o}nnen, blieben zun{\"a}chst unbeachtet. Inzwischen ist der Schadensersatzanspruch gem. Art. 82 DSGVO die Vorschrift, die die meisten Vorlagen zum Europ{\"a}ischen Gerichtshof (EuGH) der letzten Jahre hervorgerufen hat. Am 4.5.2023 hat nun der EuGH (Urteil v. 4.5.2023 - Rs. C-300/21, NWB GAAAJ-41389) in einem Grundsatzurteil {\"u}ber zentrale Fragen rund um den Ersatz immaterieller Sch{\"a}den als Folge von Datenschutzverst{\"o}ßen entschieden.}, language = {de} } @article{Hoepner2009, author = {Hoepner, Gert}, title = {Ihr Statement bitte : [Vertrauen der Kunden]}, series = {direkt plus (2009)}, journal = {direkt plus (2009)}, pages = {34}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @incollection{KirschBassen2013, author = {Kirsch, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and Bassen, Yasmine}, title = {IGW RS HFA 21 : konzeptionelle L{\"o}sung oder Einzelfall? ; Erfolg bei Spenden sammelnden Organisationen ; eine bilanztheoretische Untersuchung}, series = {Jahrbuch f{\"u}r Controlling und Rechnungswesen. Vol. 29}, booktitle = {Jahrbuch f{\"u}r Controlling und Rechnungswesen. Vol. 29}, publisher = {LexisNexis, ARD Orac}, address = {Wien}, pages = {355 -- 369}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{Grap2007, author = {Grap, Rolf Dietmar}, title = {If you think, education is expensive, try incompetence}, series = {Beschaffung aktuell (2007)}, journal = {Beschaffung aktuell (2007)}, isbn = {0341-4507}, pages = {62 -- 63}, year = {2007}, language = {en} } @book{Call1993, author = {Call, Guido}, title = {H{\"o}rfunkstudie 1993 - Die Programmakzeptanz des Belgischen Rundfunks in der Euregio}, address = {Aachen}, year = {1993}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{BeckerEggertFleischeretal.2013, author = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Eggert, Mathias and Fleischer, Stefan and Knackstedt, Ralf}, title = {How to Teach Regulatory Compliant Data Warehouse Engineering?}, series = {Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois, August 15-17, 2013.}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois, August 15-17, 2013.}, pages = {10 S.}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @article{GoergensGreubelMoosdorf2013, author = {G{\"o}rgens, Stefan and Greubel, Steffen and Moosdorf, Andreas}, title = {How to mobilize 20,000 people: Perspectives on retail and consumer goods}, pages = {52 -- 58}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @article{KlettkeHomburgGell2015, author = {Klettke, Tanja and Homburg, Carsten and Gell, Sebastian}, title = {How to measure analyst forecast effort}, series = {European Accounting Review}, volume = {24}, journal = {European Accounting Review}, number = {1}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, address = {London}, issn = {0963-8180}, doi = {10.1080/09638180.2014.909291}, pages = {129 -- 146}, year = {2015}, abstract = {We introduce a new way to measure the forecast effort that analysts devote to their earnings forecasts by measuring the analyst's general effort for all covered firms. While the commonly applied effort measure is based on analyst behaviour for one firm, our measure considers analyst behaviour for all covered firms. Our general effort measure captures additional information about analyst effort and thus can identify accurate forecasts. We emphasise the importance of investigating analyst behaviour in a larger context and argue that analysts who generally devote substantial forecast effort are also likely to devote substantial effort to a specific firm, even if this effort might not be captured by a firm-specific measure. Empirical results reveal that analysts who devote higher general forecast effort issue more accurate forecasts. Additional investigations show that analysts' career prospects improve with higher general forecast effort. Our measure improves on existing methods as it has higher explanatory power regarding differences in forecast accuracy than the commonly applied effort measure. Additionally, it can address research questions that cannot be examined with a firm-specific measure. It provides a simple but comprehensive way to identify accurate analysts.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BeckerEggertSchwittay2012, author = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Eggert, Mathias and Schwittay, Sebastian}, title = {How to Evaluate the Practical Relevance of Business Process Compliance Checking Approaches?}, series = {Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 - Tagungsband der MKWI 2012}, booktitle = {Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 - Tagungsband der MKWI 2012}, editor = {Mattfeld, Dirk Christian}, publisher = {Institut f{\"u}r Wirtschaftsinformatik}, address = {Braunschweig}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:084-13011115376}, pages = {849 -- 862}, year = {2012}, language = {en} }