@article{EmhardtJarodzkaBrandGruweletal.2020, author = {Emhardt, Selina and Jarodzka, Halszka and Brand-Gruwel, Saskia and Drumm, Christian and Gog, Tamara van}, title = {Introducing eye movement modeling examples for programming education and the role of teacher's didactic guidance}, series = {ETRA '20 Short Papers: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications}, journal = {ETRA '20 Short Papers: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications}, number = {Art. 52}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {New York}, doi = {10.1145/3379156.3391978}, pages = {1 -- 4}, year = {2020}, abstract = {In this article, we introduce how eye-tracking technology might become a promising tool to teach programming skills, such as debugging with 'Eye Movement Modeling Examples' (EMME). EMME are tutorial videos that visualize an expert's (e.g., a programming teacher's) eye movements during task performance to guide students' attention, e.g., as a moving dot or circle. We first introduce the general idea behind the EMME method and present studies that showed first promising results regarding the benefits of EMME to support programming education. However, we argue that the instructional design of EMME varies notably across them, as evidence-based guidelines on how to create effective EMME are often lacking. As an example, we present our ongoing research on the effects of different ways to instruct the EMME model prior to video creation. Finally, we highlight open questions for future investigations that could help improving the design of EMME for (programming) education.}, language = {en} } @article{EggertAlberts2020, author = {Eggert, Mathias and Alberts, Jens}, title = {Frontiers of business intelligence and analytics 3.0: a taxonomy-based literature review and research agenda}, series = {Business Research}, volume = {2020}, journal = {Business Research}, number = {13}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {2198-2627}, doi = {10.1007/s40685-020-00108-y}, pages = {685 -- 739}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Researching the field of business intelligence and analytics (BI \& A) has a long tradition within information systems research. Thereby, in each decade the rapid development of technologies opened new room for investigation. Since the early 1950s, the collection and analysis of structured data were the focus of interest, followed by unstructured data since the early 1990s. The third wave of BI \& A comprises unstructured and sensor data of mobile devices. The article at hand aims at drawing a comprehensive overview of the status quo in relevant BI \& A research of the current decade, focusing on the third wave of BI \& A. By this means, the paper's contribution is fourfold. First, a systematically developed taxonomy for BI \& A 3.0 research, containing seven dimensions and 40 characteristics, is presented. Second, the results of a structured literature review containing 75 full research papers are analyzed by applying the developed taxonomy. The analysis provides an overview on the status quo of BI \& A 3.0. Third, the results foster discussions on the predicted and observed developments in BI \& A research of the past decade. Fourth, research gaps of the third wave of BI \& A research are disclosed and concluded in a research agenda.}, language = {en} } @article{KrollLudwigs2019, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Vernachl{\"a}ssigung des unionsrechtlichen Anerkennungsprinzips durch den BGH}, series = {NJW Neue Juristische Wochenschrift}, journal = {NJW Neue Juristische Wochenschrift}, number = {32}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {0341-1915}, pages = {2277 -- 2279}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Pietsch2015, author = {Pietsch, Wolfram}, title = {Augmenting voice of the customer analysis by analysis of belief}, series = {QFD-Forum}, journal = {QFD-Forum}, number = {30}, issn = {1431-6951}, pages = {1 -- 5}, year = {2015}, language = {en} } @article{Timme2019, author = {Timme, Michael}, title = {Die Unwirksamkeit von auf {\"O}ffnungsklauseln in Gemeinschaftsordnungen fußenden Beschl{\"u}ssen}, series = {Monatsschrift f{\"u}r deutsches Recht}, journal = {Monatsschrift f{\"u}r deutsches Recht}, number = {15}, publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, issn = {0340-1812}, doi = {10.9785/mdtr-2019-731509}, pages = {904 -- 905}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{BuckLaeubliMeyeretal.2013, author = {Buck, Raphael and L{\"a}ubli, Daniel and Meyer, Laura and Moosdorf, Andreas}, title = {Re-FRESH! Mit dem Frischesortiment punkten}, series = {Akzente}, journal = {Akzente}, number = {3}, pages = {36 -- 43}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{Moosdorf2009, author = {Moosdorf, Andreas}, title = {It's not just the Talent, it's the Knowledge Transfer Method}, series = {GC Ticker}, journal = {GC Ticker}, number = {1}, pages = {16 -- 16}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{GoergensGreubelMoosdorf2013, author = {G{\"o}rgens, Stefan and Greubel, Steffen and Moosdorf, Andreas}, title = {How to mobilize 20,000 people: Perspectives on retail and consumer goods}, pages = {52 -- 58}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @article{Bernecker2010, author = {Bernecker, Andreas}, title = {A European Private Company: Is Europe's single legal form for SMEs close to approval?}, series = {Research Briefing}, journal = {Research Briefing}, publisher = {Deutsche Bank Research}, address = {Frankfurt a. M.}, issn = {2193-5955}, year = {2010}, abstract = {This Research Briefing, issued in July 2010, concluded that: - Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Europe have long called for a matching legal form valid across the EU (similar to that of the European company (SE) for large firms) - The main benefits would be the availability of uniform Europe-wide company structures, significant cost reductions for businesses and further integration of the internal market - Given the differing national views regarding the concrete features of the new legal form there is currently no sign of an agreement being reached at the European level in the short term; however, it is possible that progress will be made in negotiations during the year - The key issues being discussed in depth are company formation, transnationality and employee participation rights in the new European private company (SPE).}, language = {en} } @article{KrollLudwigsKaesling2014, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin and Kaesling, Katharina}, title = {Family Law and Culture in Europe: Developments, Challenges and Opportunities - Konferenz der Commission on European Family Law vom 29.-31. August 2013, Bonn}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Europ{\"a}isches Privatrecht (ZEuP)}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Europ{\"a}isches Privatrecht (ZEuP)}, number = {3}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {0943-3929}, pages = {673 -- 676}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Vor dem Hintergrund zunehmender gesellschaftlicher Ver{\"a}nderungen bei den Lebens- und Familienformen hat es sich die Commission on European Family Law (CEFL) seit 2001 zum Ziel gesetzt, unverbindliche Regelungsvorschl{\"a}ge f{\"u}r ein europaweit einheitliches Familienrecht zu schaffen. Die Vorstellung und Diskussion dieser auf rechtsvergleichender Basis erstellten Principles erfolgt auf den regelm{\"a}ßig veranstalteten Tagungen der CEFL. Die nunmehr f{\"u}nfte Konferenz zum Thema „Family Law and Culture in Europe - Developments, Challenges and Opportunities" fand erstmals in Deutschland statt. Ausgerichtet wurde die Veranstaltung, zu der ca. 200 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmern aus Wissenschaft und Praxis aus insgesamt 33 L{\"a}ndern angereist waren, von Nina Dethloff (Direktorin des Instituts f{\"u}r Deutsches, Europ{\"a}isches und Internationales Familienrecht an der Universit{\"a}t Bonn), Katharina Boele-Woelki (Direktorin des Utrecht Centre for European Research into Family Law und Preistr{\"a}gerin des Anneliese Maier-Forschungspreises der Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung) und Werner Gephart (Direktor des K{\"a}te Hamburger Kollegs „Recht als Kultur").}, language = {de} } @article{Bernecker2014, author = {Bernecker, Andreas}, title = {Divided Government and the Adoption of Economic Reforms}, series = {CESifo DICE Report - Journal for Institutional Comparison}, volume = {12}, journal = {CESifo DICE Report - Journal for Institutional Comparison}, number = {4}, publisher = {Ifo Institute for Economic Research}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {1612-0663}, pages = {47 -- 52}, year = {2014}, language = {en} } @article{Bernecker2014, author = {Bernecker, Andreas}, title = {Do politicians shirk when reelection is certain? Evidence from the German parliament}, series = {European Journal of Political Economy}, volume = {36}, journal = {European Journal of Political Economy}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0176-2680}, doi = {10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.07.001}, pages = {55 -- 70}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Does stiffer electoral competition reduce political shirking? For a micro-analysis of this question, I construct a new data set spanning the years 2005 to 2012 covering biographical and political information about German Members of Parliament (MPs), including their attendance rates in voting sessions. For the parliament elected in 2009, I show that indeed opposition party MPs who expect to face a close race in their district show significantly and relevantly lower absence rates in parliament beforehand. MPs of governing parties seem not to react significantly to electoral competition. These results are confirmed by an analysis of the parliament elected in 2005, by several robustness checks, and also by employing an instrumental variable strategy exploiting convenient peculiarities of the German electoral system. The study also shows how MPs elected via party lists react to different levels of electoral competition.}, language = {en} } @article{Bernecker2016, author = {Bernecker, Andreas}, title = {Divided we reform? Evidence from US welfare policies}, series = {Journal of Public Economics}, volume = {142}, journal = {Journal of Public Economics}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0047-2727}, doi = {10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.003}, pages = {24 -- 38}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Divided government is often thought of as causing legislative deadlock. I investigate the link between divided government and economic reforms using a novel data set on welfare reforms in US states between 1978 and 2010. Panel data regressions show that, under divided government, a US state is around 25\% more likely to adopt a welfare reform than under unified government. Several robustness checks confirm this counter-intuitive finding. Case study evidence suggests an explanation based on policy competition between governor, senate, and house.}, language = {en} } @article{BerneckerKlierSternetal.2018, author = {Bernecker, Andreas and Klier, Julia and Stern, Sebastian and Thiel, Lea}, title = {Sustaining high performance beyond public-sector pilot projects.}, number = {September 2018}, organization = {McKinsey\&Company}, year = {2018}, language = {en} } @article{HirschKleebergSchmitz2018, author = {Hirsch, Marko and Kleeberg, Jochen and Schmitz, Philipp}, title = {Dynamische Asset-Allocation- Strategien im Niedrigzinsumfeld}, series = {Absolut|report : neue Perspektiven f{\"u}r institutionelle Investoren}, journal = {Absolut|report : neue Perspektiven f{\"u}r institutionelle Investoren}, number = {6}, publisher = {Absolut Research}, address = {Hamburg}, pages = {52}, year = {2018}, language = {de} } @article{KrollLudwigs2015, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Anmerkung zu OLG M{\"u}nchen: Erbscheinserteilung nach Eintritt des Nacherbfalls, Beschl. v. 1.10.2014 - Wx 314/14}, series = {DNotZ - Deutsche Notar-Zeitschrift}, journal = {DNotZ - Deutsche Notar-Zeitschrift}, number = {5}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {0340-8604}, pages = {385 -- 390}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{KrollLudwigs2016, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urt. v. 9.9.2015, Rs. C-4/14 Christophe Bohez v. Ingrid Wiertz}, series = {GRP : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das Privatrecht der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, journal = {GRP : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das Privatrecht der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, number = {5}, publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, issn = {2193-9519}, doi = {10.9785/gpr-2016-0509}, pages = {255 -- 258}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Die Entscheidung in der Rechtssache Bohez /Wiertz bot dem EuGH Gelegenheit, zur Abgrenzung der Anwendungsbereiche von Br{\"u}ssel I-(jetzt: Br{\"u}ssel Ia-) und Br{\"u}ssel IIa-VO Stellung zu nehmen. Den Ausgangspunkt bildete dabei ein familienrechtlicher Sachverhalt, n{\"a}mlich die zwangsweise Durchsetzung des Umgangsrechts eines Vaters im Hinblick auf seine beiden Kinder. Auf den ersten Blick lag daher eine Anwendung der auf Verfahren betreffend die elterliche Verantwortung bezogenen Br{\"u}ssel IIa-VO nahe. Andererseits schien auch eine Argumentation denkbar, wonach es sich bei dem zu vollstreckenden Anspruch auf Zahlung des Zwangsgeldes um eine Geldforderung handele, deren Vollstreckung nach der Br{\"u}ssel I-VO zu erfolgen habe. Was vordergr{\"u}ndig die Ermittlung des einschl{\"a}gigen EU-Rechtsaktes betraf, erwies sich bei genauerer Betrachtung als Bestimmung der dogmatischen Rechtsnatur des Zwangsgeldes.}, language = {de} } @article{KrollLudwigs2015, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Anforderungen des Unionsrechts an die standardisierte Darstellung des Namens : Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urt. v. 2. Oktober 2014, Rs. C-101/13 - Stadt Karlsruhe}, series = {GRP : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das Privatrecht der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, journal = {GRP : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das Privatrecht der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, number = {6}, publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, issn = {2193-9519}, pages = {282 -- 285}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{KrollLudwigs2013, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urt. v. 26. April 2012, Rs. C-92/12 PPU - Health Service Executive}, series = {GRP : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das Privatrecht der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, journal = {GRP : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das Privatrecht der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, number = {1}, publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, issn = {2193-9519}, pages = {46 -- 49}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{KrollLudwigs2011, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urt. v. 22. 12. 2010, Rs. C-208/09 - Sayn-Wittgenstein}, series = {GPR : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das Privatrecht der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, journal = {GPR : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das Privatrecht der Europ{\"a}ischen Union}, number = {5}, publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, issn = {2193-9519}, doi = {10.1515/gpr.2011.8.5.242}, pages = {242 -- 245}, year = {2011}, language = {de} }