@article{OssmannHattrupBroeck2003, author = {Oßmann, Martin and Hattrup, C. and Broeck, H. W. van der}, title = {Fast estimation techniques for digital control of resonant converters / Hattrup, C.; van der Broeck, H.W.; Ossmann, M.;}, series = {IEEE Transaction on Power Electronics. 18 (2003), H. 1}, journal = {IEEE Transaction on Power Electronics. 18 (2003), H. 1}, isbn = {0885-8993}, pages = {365 -- 372}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @article{PrumeMuraltCalameetal.2007, author = {Prume, Klaus and Muralt, Paul and Calame, Florian and Schmitz-Kempen, Thorsten}, title = {Extensive electromechanical characterization of PZT thin films for MEMS applications by electrical and mechanical excitation signals / Prume, Klaus ; Muralt, Paul ; Calame, Florian ; Schmitz-Kempen, Thorsten ; Tiedke, Stephan}, series = {Journal of Electroceramics. 19 (2007), H. 4}, journal = {Journal of Electroceramics. 19 (2007), H. 4}, isbn = {1385-3449}, pages = {407 -- 411}, year = {2007}, language = {en} } @article{FerreinFritzLakemeyer2003, author = {Ferrein, Alexander and Fritz, Christian and Lakemeyer, Gerhard}, title = {Extending DTGOLOG with Options / Ferrein, Alexander ; Fritz, Christian ; Lakemeyer, Gerhard}, series = {IJCAI-03, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico, August 9-15, 2003}, journal = {IJCAI-03, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico, August 9-15, 2003}, pages = {1391 -- 1393}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @article{SchlamannVoigtMaderwaldetal.2010, author = {Schlamann, Marc and Voigt, Melanie A. and Maderwald, Stefan and Bitz, Andreas and Kraff, Oliver and Ladd, Susanne C. and Ladd, Mark E. and Forsting, Michael and Wilhelm, Hans}, title = {Exposure to high-field MRI does not affect cognitive function}, series = {Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging}, volume = {31}, journal = {Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging}, number = {5}, publisher = {Wiley-Liss}, address = {New York}, issn = {1522-2586}, doi = {10.1002/jmri.22065}, pages = {1061 -- 1066}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Purpose To assess potential cognitive deficits under the influence of static magnetic fields at various field strengths some studies already exist. These studies were not focused on attention as the most vulnerable cognitive function. Additionally, mostly no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences were performed. Materials and Methods In all, 25 right-handed men were enrolled in this study. All subjects underwent one MRI examination of 63 minutes at 1.5 T and one at 7 T within an interval of 10 to 30 days. The order of the examinations was randomized. Subjects were referred to six standardized neuropsychological tests strictly focused on attention immediately before and after each MRI examination. Differences in neuropsychological variables between the timepoints before and after each MRI examination were assessed and P-values were calculated Results Only six subtests revealed significant differences between pre- and post-MRI. In these tests the subjects achieved better results in post-MRI testing than in pre-MRI testing (P = 0.013-0.032). The other tests revealed no significant results. Conclusion The improvement in post-MRI testing is only explicable as a result of learning effects. MRI examinations, even in ultrahigh-field scanners, do not seem to have any persisting influence on the attention networks of human cognition immediately after exposure.}, language = {en} } @article{ReinhardtBitzElOuardietal.2007, author = {Reinhardt, T. and Bitz, Andreas and El Ouardi, A. and Streckert, J. and Sommer, A. and Lerchl, A. and Hansen, V.}, title = {Exposure set-ups for in vivo experiments using radial waveguides}, series = {Radiation Protection Dosimetry}, volume = {124}, journal = {Radiation Protection Dosimetry}, number = {1}, issn = {1742-3406}, doi = {10.1093/rpd/ncm370}, pages = {21 -- 26}, year = {2007}, language = {en} } @article{Siepmann1999, author = {Siepmann, Thomas}, title = {Exploitation Plan of the TELEflow Project}, address = {Brussels}, year = {1999}, language = {en} } @article{Siepmann1991, author = {Siepmann, Thomas}, title = {Expertensysteme in der rechnerintegrierten Produktion}, series = {Einf{\"u}hrung in die CIM-Praxis : rechnerintegrierte Produktion / hrsg. von Gerhard Neipp ...}, journal = {Einf{\"u}hrung in die CIM-Praxis : rechnerintegrierte Produktion / hrsg. von Gerhard Neipp ...}, publisher = {VDI-Verl.}, address = {D{\"u}sseldorf}, isbn = {3-18-401098-8}, pages = {187 -- 198}, year = {1991}, language = {de} } @article{SiepmannPfeifferTeichmann1988, author = {Siepmann, Thomas and Pfeiffer, J. and Teichmann, W.}, title = {Expertensystem zur spanenden Bearbeitung}, series = {Technische Mitteilungen Krupp (1988)}, journal = {Technische Mitteilungen Krupp (1988)}, address = {Essen}, year = {1988}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{HeinolXuSchwarteetal.1997, author = {Heinol, Horst-Guenther and Xu, Zhanping and Schwarte, Rudolf and Ringbeck, Thorsten}, title = {Experimentelle Ergebnisse eines neuartigen schnellen 3D-MeEsystems mit modifizierten elektrooptischen Modulationskomponenten}, series = {Optische Formerfassung : Erfahrungsaustausch zwischen Anwendern und Entwicklern ; Manuskripte der Vortr{\"a}ge und Pr{\"a}sentationen zur DGZfP-VDI/VDE-GMA-Fachtagung am 28. und 29. April 1997 in der Stadthalle in Langen. - (GMA-Bericht ; 30)}, booktitle = {Optische Formerfassung : Erfahrungsaustausch zwischen Anwendern und Entwicklern ; Manuskripte der Vortr{\"a}ge und Pr{\"a}sentationen zur DGZfP-VDI/VDE-GMA-Fachtagung am 28. und 29. April 1997 in der Stadthalle in Langen. - (GMA-Bericht ; 30)}, editor = {Deppe, Gerd-Joachim}, publisher = {Gesellschaft Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik}, address = {D{\"u}sseldorf}, pages = {99 -- 103}, year = {1997}, language = {de} } @article{AltherrEdererLorenzetal.2014, author = {Altherr, Lena and Ederer, Thorsten and Lorenz, Ulf and Pelz, Peter F. and P{\"o}ttgen, Philipp}, title = {Experimental validation of an enhanced system synthesis approach}, series = {Operations Research Proceedings 2014}, journal = {Operations Research Proceedings 2014}, editor = {L{\"u}bbecke, Marco and Koster, Arie and Letmathe, Peter and Madlener, Reihard and Peis, Britta and Walther, Grit}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Basel}, isbn = {978-3-319-28695-2}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-28697-6_1}, pages = {6}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Planning the layout and operation of a technical system is a common task for an engineer. Typically, the workflow is divided into consecutive stages: First, the engineer designs the layout of the system, with the help of his experience or of heuristic methods. Secondly, he finds a control strategy which is often optimized by simulation. This usually results in a good operating of an unquestioned sys- tem topology. In contrast, we apply Operations Research (OR) methods to find a cost-optimal solution for both stages simultaneously via mixed integer program- ming (MILP). Technical Operations Research (TOR) allows one to find a provable global optimal solution within the model formulation. However, the modeling error due to the abstraction of physical reality remains unknown. We address this ubiq- uitous problem of OR methods by comparing our computational results with mea- surements in a test rig. For a practical test case we compute a topology and control strategy via MILP and verify that the objectives are met up to a deviation of 8.7\%.}, language = {en} }