@article{GoettenHavermannBraunetal.2020,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Marino, Matthew and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Improved Form Factor for Drag Estimation of Fuselages with Various Cross Sections},
  series = {Journal of Aircraft},
  journal   = {Journal of Aircraft},
  publisher = {AIAA},
  address   = {Reston, Va.},
  issn      = {1533-3868},
  doi       = {10.2514/1.C036032},
  pages     = {1 -- 13},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The paper presents an aerodynamic investigation of 70 different streamlined bodies with fineness ratios ranging from 2 to 10. The bodies are chosen to idealize both unmanned and small manned aircraft fuselages and feature cross-sectional shapes that vary from circular to quadratic. The study focuses on friction and pressure drag in dependency of the individual body's fineness ratio and cross section. The drag forces are normalized with the respective body's wetted area to comply with an empirical drag estimation procedure. Although the friction drag coefficient then stays rather constant for all bodies, their pressure drag coefficients decrease with an increase in fineness ratio. Referring the pressure drag coefficient to the bodies' cross-sectional areas shows a distinct pressure drag minimum at a fineness ratio of about three. The pressure drag of bodies with a quadratic cross section is generally higher than for bodies of revolution. The results are used to derive an improved form factor that can be employed in a classic empirical drag estimation method. The improved formulation takes both the fineness ratio and cross-sectional shape into account. It shows superior accuracy in estimating streamlined body drag when compared with experimental data and other form factor formulations of the literature.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{ThomaFisherBertrandetal.2020,
  author    = {Thoma, Andreas and Fisher, Alex and Bertrand, Olivier and Braun, Carsten},
  title     = {Evaluation of possible flight strategies for close object evasion from bumblebee experiments},
  series = {Living Machines 2020: Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems},
  booktitle = {Living Machines 2020: Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems},
  editor    = {Vouloutsi, Vasiliki and Mura, Anna and Tauber, Falk and Speck, Thomas and Prescott, Tony J. and Verschure, Paul F. M. J.},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-030-64312-6},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-030-64313-3_34},
  pages     = {354 -- 365},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{ThomaFisherBraun2020,
  author    = {Thoma, Andreas and Fisher, Alex and Braun, Carsten},
  title     = {Improving the px4 avoid algorithm by bio-inspired flight strategies},
  series = {DLRK2020 - „Luft- und Raumfahrt - Verantwortung in allen Dimensionen"},
  booktitle = {DLRK2020 - „Luft- und Raumfahrt - Verantwortung in allen Dimensionen"},
  doi       = {10.25967/530183},
  pages     = {10 Seiten},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FingerdeVriesVosetal.2020,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and de Vries, Reynard and Vos, Roelof and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {A comparison of hybrid-electric aircraft sizing methods},
  series = {AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum},
  booktitle = {AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum},
  doi       = {10.2514/6.2020-1006},
  pages     = {31 Seiten},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The number of case studies focusing on hybrid-electric aircraft is steadily increasing, since these configurations are thought to lead to lower operating costs and environmental impact than traditional aircraft. However, due to the lack of reference data of actual hybrid-electric aircraft, in most cases, the design tools and results are difficult to validate. In this paper, two independently developed approaches for hybrid-electric conceptual aircraft design are compared. An existing 19-seat commuter aircraft is selected as the conventional baseline, and both design tools are used to size that aircraft. The aircraft is then re-sized under consideration of hybrid-electric propulsion technology. This is performed for parallel, serial, and fully-electric powertrain architectures. Finally, sensitivity studies are conducted to assess the validity of the basic assumptions and approaches regarding the design of hybrid-electric aircraft. Both methods are found to predict the maximum take-off mass (MTOM) of the reference aircraft with less than 4\% error. The MTOM and payload-range energy efficiency of various (hybrid-) electric configurations are predicted with a maximum difference of approximately 2\% and 5\%, respectively. The results of this study confirm a correct formulation and implementation of the two design methods, and the data obtained can be used by researchers to benchmark and validate their design tools.},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{ThomaLaarmannMerkensetal.2020,
  author    = {Thoma, Andreas and Laarmann, Lukas and Merkens, Torsten and Franzke, Till and M{\"o}hren, Felix and Buttermann, Lilly and van der Weem, Dirk and Fischer, Maximilian and Misch, Philipp and B{\"o}hme, Mirijam and R{\"o}th, Thilo and Hebel, Christoph and Ritz, Thomas and Franke, Marina and Braun, Carsten},
  title     = {Entwicklung eines intermodalen Mobilit{\"a}tskonzeptes f{\"u}r die Pilotregion NRW/Rhein-Maas Euregio und Schaffung voller Kundenakzeptanz durch Transfer von Standards aus dem PKW-Bereich auf ein Flugtaxi : Schlussbericht : Projektakronym: SkyCab (Kategorie B) : Laufzeit in Monaten: 6 : Hauptthema: Kategorie B: Innovative Ideen mit Bezug zu UAS/Flugtaxis},
  publisher = {FH Aachen},
  address   = {Aachen},
  pages     = {97 Seiten},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}