@inproceedings{FingerGoettenBraunetal.2019,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and G{\"o}tten, Falk and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Mass, Primary Energy, and Cost - The Impact of Optimization Objectives on the Initial Sizing of Hybrid-Electric General Aviation Aircraft},
  series = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2019, DLRK 2019. Darmstadt, Germany},
  booktitle = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2019, DLRK 2019. Darmstadt, Germany},
  doi       = {10.25967/490012},
  pages     = {1 -- 17},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GoettenFingerMarinoetal.2019,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Finger, Felix and Marino, Matthew and Bil, Cees and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten},
  title     = {A review of guidelines and best practices for subsonic aerodynamic simulations using RANS CFD},
  series = {Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT), At Gold Coast, Australia, 04. - 06. Dezember 2019},
  booktitle = {Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT), At Gold Coast, Australia, 04. - 06. Dezember 2019},
  isbn      = {978-1-925627-40-4},
  pages     = {19 Seiten},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GoettenHavermannBraunetal.2021,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Marino, Matthew and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Aerodynamic Investigations of UAV Sensor Turrets - A Combined Wind-tunnel and CFD Approach},
  series = {SciTech 2021, AIAA SciTech Forum, online, WW, Jan 11-15, 2021},
  journal   = {SciTech 2021, AIAA SciTech Forum, online, WW, Jan 11-15, 2021},
  publisher = {AIAA},
  address   = {Reston, Va.},
  doi       = {10.2514/6.2021-1535},
  pages     = {1 -- 12},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GoettenFingerHavermannetal.2020,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Finger, Felix and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Marino, Matthew and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Full Configuration Drag Estimation of Small-to-Medium Range UAVs and its Impact on Initial Sizing Optimization},
  series = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  volume    = {12},
  booktitle = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wien},
  issn      = {1869-5590},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13272-021-00522-w},
  pages     = {589 -- 603},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The paper presents the derivation of a new equivalent skin friction coefficient for estimating the parasitic drag of short-to-medium range fixed-wing unmanned aircraft. The new coefficient is derived from an aerodynamic analysis of ten different unmanned aircraft used on surveillance, reconnaissance, and search and rescue missions. The aircraft are simulated using a validated unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes approach. The UAV's parasitic drag is significantly influenced by the presence of miscellaneous components like fixed landing gears or electro-optical sensor turrets. These components are responsible for almost half of an unmanned aircraft's total parasitic drag. The new equivalent skin friction coefficient accounts for these effects and is significantly higher compared to other aircraft categories. It is used to initially size an unmanned aircraft for a typical reconnaissance mission. The improved parasitic drag estimation yields a much heavier unmanned aircraft when compared to the sizing results using available drag data of manned aircraft.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FingerBilBraun2019,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and Bil, Cees and Braun, Carsten},
  title     = {Initial Sizing Methodology for Hybrid-Electric General Aviation Aircraft},
  series = {Journal of Aircraft},
  volume    = {57},
  journal   = {Journal of Aircraft},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {1533-3868},
  doi       = {10.2514/1.C035428},
  pages     = {245 -- 255},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GoettenFingerHavermannetal.2019,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Finger, Felix and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Marino, Matthew and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {A highly automated method for simulating airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds number using a RANS - transition approach},
  series = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2019. Darmstadt, Germany},
  booktitle = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2019. Darmstadt, Germany},
  doi       = {10.25967/490026},
  pages     = {1 -- 14},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FingerGoettenBraunetal.2019,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and G{\"o}tten, Falk and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Cost Estimation Methods for Hybrid-Electric General Aviation Aircraft},
  series = {Asia Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology. APISAT 2019},
  booktitle = {Asia Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology. APISAT 2019},
  pages     = {1 -- 13},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FingerBraunBil2020,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Comparative assessment of parallel-hybrid-electric propulsion systems for four different aircraft},
  series = {AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum},
  booktitle = {AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum},
  doi       = {10.2514/6.2020-1502},
  pages     = {15 Seiten},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {As battery technologies advance, electric propulsion concepts are on the edge of disrupting aviation markets. However, until electric energy storage systems are ready to allow fully electric aircraft, the combination of combustion engine and electric motor as a hybrid-electric propulsion system seems to be a promising intermediate solution. Consequently, the design space for future aircraft is expanded considerably, as serial-hybrid-, parallel-hybrid-, fully-electric, and conventional propulsion systems must all be considered. While the best propulsion system depends on a multitude of requirements and considerations, trends can be observed for certain types of aircraft and certain types of missions. This paper provides insight into some factors that drive a new design towards either conventional or hybrid propulsion systems. General aviation aircraft, VTOL air taxis, transport aircraft, and UAVs are chosen as case studies. Typical missions for each class are considered, and the aircraft are analyzed regarding their take-off mass and primary energy consumption. For these case studies, a high-level approach is chosen, using an initial sizing methodology. Results indicate that hybrid-electric propulsion systems should be considered if the propulsion system is sized by short-duration power constraints (e.g. take-off, climb). However, if the propulsion system is sized by a continuous power requirement (e.g. cruise), hybrid-electric systems offer hardly any benefit.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FingerBraunBil2019,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Impact of Engine Failure Constraints on the Initial Sizing of Hybrid-Electric GA Aircraft},
  series = {AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum},
  booktitle = {AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum},
  doi       = {10.2514/6.2019-1812},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GoettenHavermannBraunetal.2020,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Marino, Matthew and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Improved Form Factor for Drag Estimation of Fuselages with Various Cross Sections},
  series = {Journal of Aircraft},
  journal   = {Journal of Aircraft},
  publisher = {AIAA},
  address   = {Reston, Va.},
  issn      = {1533-3868},
  doi       = {10.2514/1.C036032},
  pages     = {1 -- 13},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The paper presents an aerodynamic investigation of 70 different streamlined bodies with fineness ratios ranging from 2 to 10. The bodies are chosen to idealize both unmanned and small manned aircraft fuselages and feature cross-sectional shapes that vary from circular to quadratic. The study focuses on friction and pressure drag in dependency of the individual body's fineness ratio and cross section. The drag forces are normalized with the respective body's wetted area to comply with an empirical drag estimation procedure. Although the friction drag coefficient then stays rather constant for all bodies, their pressure drag coefficients decrease with an increase in fineness ratio. Referring the pressure drag coefficient to the bodies' cross-sectional areas shows a distinct pressure drag minimum at a fineness ratio of about three. The pressure drag of bodies with a quadratic cross section is generally higher than for bodies of revolution. The results are used to derive an improved form factor that can be employed in a classic empirical drag estimation method. The improved formulation takes both the fineness ratio and cross-sectional shape into account. It shows superior accuracy in estimating streamlined body drag when compared with experimental data and other form factor formulations of the literature.},
  language  = {en}
}