@article{SchmidtLangenHerzogetal.1997, author = {Schmidt, Daniela and Langen, Karl-J. and Herzog, Hans and Wirths, Jochen and Holschbach, Markus and Kiwit, J{\"u}rgen C. W. and Ziemons, Karl and Coenen, Heinz-H. and M{\"u}ller-G{\"a}rtner, Hans-W.}, title = {Whole-body kinetics and dosimetry of L-3[123I]-iodo-α-methyltyrosine}, series = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine}, volume = {24}, journal = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine}, number = {9}, isbn = {1619-7089}, pages = {1162 -- 1166}, year = {1997}, language = {en} } @misc{RongenZiemonsSchieketal.2006, author = {Rongen, Heinz and Ziemons, Karl and Schiek, Michael and Tass, Alexander}, title = {Vorrichtung zur Messung biomedizinischer Daten eines Probanden und Verfahren zur Simulation des Probanden mit in Echtzeit verarbeiteten Daten}, pages = {1 -- 12}, year = {2006}, abstract = {Die Erfindung betrifft eine Vorrichtung zur Messung biomedizinischer Daten eines Probanden, mit einem Messsystem zur Erhebung der Daten sowie einer ersten Hardware-Komponente zur Aufzeichnung der Daten. In einer Verbindungsleitung zur {\"U}bertragung der Daten vom Messsystem zur ersten Hardware-Komponente zur Aufzeichnung der Daten ist erfindungsgem{\"a}ss ein Mittel zur galvanischen Auftrennung der Daten angeordnet. Auf diese Weise ist wenigstens die Duplizierung der Daten f{\"u}r Datenverarbeitungszwecke gew{\"a}hrleistet. Die auf diese Weise verarbeiteten Daten werden f{\"u}r ein Verfahren zur Echtzeit-Stimulation eines Probanden genutzt.}, language = {de} } @misc{AchtenBauerBertrametal.2005, author = {Achten, Richard and Bauer, Andreas and Bertram, Walter and Cremer, Markus and Daemen, Jos and Dehnhardt, Markus and Fleischer, Manfred and Kirchner, Peter and Leyendecker, Marco and Pietrzyk, Uwe and Schmitz, Jakob and Ziemons, Karl and Zilles, Karl}, title = {Vorrichtung zum Halten eines lebenden Objektes bei physiologischen Messungen}, pages = {1 -- 17}, year = {2005}, abstract = {Die vorliegende Erfindung betrifft eine Vorrichtung zum Halten eines lebenden Objektes bei physiologischen Messungen mit einem Basiselement und Mitteln zum Arretieren des lebenden Objektes, die atraumatische Ohrenhalter sowie ein Mundst{\"u}ck aufweisen, das mit einer Aussparung f{\"u}r die Z{\"a}hne des Lebewesens versehen ist, mit einem Masseanteil von wenigstens 95\% an glasfaserverst{\"a}rktem Kunststoff.}, language = {de} } @article{ZiemonsHeinrichsStreunetal.2004, author = {Ziemons, Karl and Heinrichs, U. and Streun, M. and Pietrzyk, U.}, title = {Validation of GEANT3 simulation studies with a dual-head PMT ClearPET™ prototype}, series = {2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Vol. 5}, journal = {2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Vol. 5}, issn = {1082-3654}, pages = {3053 -- 3056}, year = {2004}, abstract = {The ClearPET™ project is proposed by working groups of the Crystal Clear Collaboration (CCC) to develop a 2nd generation high performance small animal positron emission tomograph (PET). High sensitivity and high spatial resolution is foreseen for the ClearPET™ camera by using a phoswich arrangement combining mixed lutetium yttrium aluminum perovskite (LuYAP:Ce) and lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) scintillating crystals. Design optimizations for the first photomultiplier tube (PMT) based ClearPET camera are done with a Monte-Carlo simulation package implemented on GEANT3 (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland). A dual-head prototype has been built to test the frontend electronics and was used to validate the implementation of the GEANT3 simulation tool. Multiple simulations were performed following the experimental protocols to measure the intrinsic resolution and the sensitivity profile in axial and radial direction. Including a mean energy resolution of about 27.0\% the simulated intrinsic resolution is about (1.41±0.11)mm compared to the measured of (1.48±0.06)mm. The simulated sensitivity profiles show a mean square deviation of 12.6\% in axial direction and 3.6\% in radial direction. Satisfactorily these results are representative for all designs and confirm the scanner geometry.}, language = {en} } @article{StreunChavanLameetal.2006, author = {Streun, M. and Chavan, U. and Lame, H. and Parl, C. and M{\"u}ller-Veggian, Mattea and Ziemons, Karl}, title = {Treating the Gain Non-Uniformity of Multi Channel PMTs by Channel-Specific Trigger Levels}, series = {2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Vol. 2.}, journal = {2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Vol. 2.}, address = {San Diego, CA}, issn = {1082-3654}, pages = {1301 -- 1304}, year = {2006}, language = {en} } @article{StreunBrandenburgKhodaverdietal.2006, author = {Streun, M. and Brandenburg, G. and Khodaverdi, M. and Larue, H. and Parl, C. and Ziemons, Karl}, title = {Timemark correction for the ClearPET™ scanners}, series = {2005 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Vol. 4}, journal = {2005 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Vol. 4}, isbn = {1082-3654}, pages = {2057 -- 2060}, year = {2006}, abstract = {The small animal PET scanners developed by the Crystal Clear Collaboration (ClearPETtrade) detect coincidences by analyzing timemarks which are attached to each event. The scanners are able to save complete single list mode data which allows analysis and modification of the timemarks after data acquisition. The timemarks are obtained from the digitally sampled detector pulses by calculating the baseline crossing of the rising edge of the pulse which is approximated as a straight line. But the limited sampling frequency causes a systematic error in the determination of the timemark. This error depends on the phase of the sampling clock at the time of the event. A statistical method that corrects these errors will be presented}, language = {en} } @article{TaylorSchmitzZiemonsetal.2000, author = {Taylor, J. G. and Schmitz, N. and Ziemons, Karl and Grosse-Ruyken, M.-L. and Gruber, O. and M{\"u}ller-G{\"a}rtner, H.-W. and Shah, N. J.}, title = {The network of brain areas involved in the motion aftereffect}, series = {Neuroimage}, volume = {11}, journal = {Neuroimage}, number = {4}, isbn = {1053-8119}, pages = {257 -- 270}, year = {2000}, abstract = {A network of brain areas is expected to be involved in supporting the motion aftereffect. The most active components of this network were determined by means of an fMRI study of nine subjects exposed to a visual stimulus of moving bars producing the effect. Across the subjects, common areas were identified during various stages of the effect, as well as networks of areas specific to a single stage. In addition to the well-known motion-sensitive area MT the prefrontal brain areas BA44 and 47 and the cingulate gyrus, as well as posterior sites such as BA37 and BA40, were important components during the period of the motion aftereffect experience. They appear to be involved in control circuitry for selecting which of a number of processing styles is appropriate. The experimental fMRI results of the activation levels and their time courses for the various areas are explored. Correlation analysis shows that there are effectively two separate and weakly coupled networks involved in the total process. Implications of the results for awareness of the effect itself are briefly considered in the final discussion.}, language = {en} } @article{HautzelTaylorKrauseetal.2001, author = {Hautzel, H. and Taylor, J. G. and Krause, B. J. and Schmitz, N. and Tellmann, L. and Ziemons, Karl and Shah, N. J. and Herzog, H. and M{\"u}ller-G{\"a}rtner, H.-W.}, title = {The motion aftereffect: more than area V5/MT? Evidence from 15O-butanol PET studies}, series = {Brain Research}, volume = {892}, journal = {Brain Research}, number = {2}, isbn = {0006-8993}, pages = {281 -- 292}, year = {2001}, abstract = {The motion aftereffect is a perceptual phenomenon which has been extensively investigated both psychologically and physiologically. Neuroimaging techniques have recently demonstrated that area V5/MT is activated during the perception of this illusion. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis if a more broadly distributed network of brain regions subserves the motion aftereffect. To identify the neuronal structures involved in the perception of the motion aftereffect, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) measurements with positron emission tomography were performed in six normal volunteers. Data were analysed using SPM96. The motion-sensitive visual areas including area V5/MT were activated in both hemispheres. Additionally, the lateral parietal cortex bilaterally, the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex and the left cerebellum showed significant increases in rCBF values during the experience of the waterfall illusion. In a further reference condition with identical attentional demand but no perception of a motion aftereffect elevated rCBF were found in these regions as well. In conclusion, our findings support the notion that the perceptual illusion of motion arises exclusively in the motion-sensitive visual area V5/MT. In addition, a more widespread network of brain regions including the prefrontal and parietal cortex is activated during the waterfall illusion which represents a non-motion aftereffect-specific subset of brain areas but is involved in more basic attentional processing and cognition.}, language = {de} } @article{StreunBrandenburgLarueetal.2006, author = {Streun, M. and Brandenburg, G. and Larue, H. and Parl, C. and Ziemons, Karl}, title = {The data acquisition system of ClearPET neuro - a small animal PET scanner}, series = {IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science}, volume = {53}, journal = {IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science}, number = {3}, isbn = {0018-9499}, pages = {700 -- 703}, year = {2006}, abstract = {The Crystal Clear Collaboration has developed a modular system for a small animal PET scanner (ClearPET). The modularity allows the assembly of scanners of different sizes and characteristics in order to satisfy the specific needs of the individual member institutions. The system performs depth of interaction detection by using a phoswich arrangement combining LSO and LuYAP scintillators which are coupled to Multichannel Photomultipliers (PMTs). For each PMT a free running 40 MHz ADC digitizes the signal and the complete scintillation pulse is sampled by an FPGA and sent with 20 MB/s to a PC for preprocessing. The pulse provides information about the gamma energy and the scintillator material which identifies the interaction layer. Furthermore, the exact pulse starting time is obtained from the sampled data. This is important as no hardware coincidence detection is implemented. All single events are recorded and coincidences are identified by software. The system in J{\"u}lich (ClearPET Neuro) is equipped with 10240 crystals on 80 PMTs. The paper will present an overview of the data acquisition system.}, language = {en} } @article{HerzogPietrzykShahetal.2010, author = {Herzog, Hans and Pietrzyk, Uwe and Shah, N. Jon and Ziemons, Karl}, title = {The current state, challenges and perspectives of MR-PET}, series = {Neuroimage}, volume = {49}, journal = {Neuroimage}, number = {3}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {1053-8119}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.036}, pages = {2072 -- 2082}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Following the success of PET/CT during the last decade and the recent increasing proliferation of SPECT/CT, another hybrid imaging instrument has been gaining more and more interest: MR-PET. First combined, simultaneous PET and MR studies carried out in small animals demonstrated the feasibility of the new approach. Concurrently, some prototypes of an MR-PET scanner for simultaneous human brain studies have been built, their performance is being tested and preliminary applications have already been shown. Through this pioneering work, it has become clear that advances in the detector design are necessary for further optimization. Recently, the different issues related to the present state and future prospects of MR-PET were presented and discussed during an international 2-day workshop at the Forschungszentrum J{\"u}lich, Germany, held after, and in conjunction with, the 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference in Dresden, Germany on October 27-28, 2008. The topics ranged from small animal MR-PET imaging to human MR-BrainPET imaging, new detector developments, challenges/opportunities for ultra-high field MR-PET imaging and considerations of possible future research and clinical applications. This report presents a critical summary of the contributions made to the workshop.}, language = {en} }