@article{SchmittSchollCaietal.2010,
  author    = {Schmitt, Robert and Scholl, Ingrid and Cai, Yu and Xia, Ji and Dziwoki, Paul and Harding, Martin and Pavim, Alberto},
  title     = {Machine Vision System for Inline Inspection in Carbide Insert Production},
  series = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2010 : Algorithmen, Systeme, Anwendungen ; Proceedings des Workshops vom 14. bis 16. M{\"a}rz in Aachen / Thomas M. Deserno ... (Hrsg.)},
  journal   = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2010 : Algorithmen, Systeme, Anwendungen ; Proceedings des Workshops vom 14. bis 16. M{\"a}rz in Aachen / Thomas M. Deserno ... (Hrsg.)},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-642-11967-5},
  pages     = {339 -- 342},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MarxSchenkBehrensetal.2013,
  author    = {Marx, Ulrich and Schenk, Friedrich and Behrens, Jan and Meyr, Ulrike and Wanek, Paul and Zang, Werner and Schmitt, Robert and Br{\"u}stle, Oliver and Zenke, Martin and Klocke, Fritz},
  title     = {Automatic production of induced pluripotent stem cells},
  series = {Procedia CIRP : First CIRP Conference on BioManufacturing},
  volume    = {Vol. 5},
  journal   = {Procedia CIRP : First CIRP Conference on BioManufacturing},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {2212-8271},
  pages     = {2 -- 6},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MuellerSeginWeigandetal.2022,
  author    = {Mueller, Tobias and Segin, Alexander and Weigand, Christoph and Schmitt, Robert H.},
  title     = {Feature selection for measurement models},
  series = {International journal of quality \& reliability management},
  journal   = {International journal of quality \& reliability management},
  number    = {Vol. ahead-of-print, No. ahead-of-print.},
  publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {0265-671X},
  doi       = {10.1108/IJQRM-07-2021-0245},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose In the determination of the measurement uncertainty, the GUM procedure requires the building of a measurement model that establishes a functional relationship between the measurand and all influencing quantities. Since the effort of modelling as well as quantifying the measurement uncertainties depend on the number of influencing quantities considered, the aim of this study is to determine relevant influencing quantities and to remove irrelevant ones from the dataset. Design/methodology/approach In this work, it was investigated whether the effort of modelling for the determination of measurement uncertainty can be reduced by the use of feature selection (FS) methods. For this purpose, 9 different FS methods were tested on 16 artificial test datasets, whose properties (number of data points, number of features, complexity, features with low influence and redundant features) were varied via a design of experiments. Findings Based on a success metric, the stability, universality and complexity of the method, two FS methods could be identified that reliably identify relevant and irrelevant influencing quantities for a measurement model. Originality/value For the first time, FS methods were applied to datasets with properties of classical measurement processes. The simulation-based results serve as a basis for further research in the field of FS for measurement models. The identified algorithms will be applied to real measurement processes in the future.},
  language  = {en}
}