@inproceedings{BeckerHoefkenSchuetzetal.2016, author = {Becker, Sebastian and H{\"o}fken, Hans-Wilhelm and Sch{\"u}tz, Philip and Schuba, Marko}, title = {IT-forensische Erkennung modifizierter Android-Apps}, series = {Proceedings of DACH Security 2016, Klagenfurt, Austria, September 2016}, booktitle = {Proceedings of DACH Security 2016, Klagenfurt, Austria, September 2016}, editor = {Schartner, P.}, pages = {120 -- 125}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Malware auf Smartphones ist ein Problem, dem auch Strafverfolgungsbeh{\"o}rden immer h{\"a}ufiger gegen{\"u}berstehen. Insbesondere Telefone, bei denen potentiell schadhafte Apps zu einem finanziellen Schaden gef{\"u}hrt haben, finden sich auf den Schreibtischen der Polizei wieder. Dabei m{\"u}ssen die Ermittler m{\"o}glichst schnell und gezielt erkennen k{\"o}nnen, ob eine App tats{\"a}chlich schadhaft manipuliert wurde, was manipuliert wurde und mit wem die App kommuniziert. Klassische Malware-Erkennungsverfahren helfen zwar bei der generellen Erkennung schadhafter Software, sind aber f{\"u}r die polizeiliche Praxis nicht geeignet. Dieses Paper stellt ein Programm vor, welches gerade die forensischen Fragestellungen ber{\"u}cksichtigt und so f{\"u}r den Einsatz in der Strafverfolgung in Frage kommt.}, language = {de} } @article{BeckerDelfmannEggertetal.2012, author = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Delfmann, Patrick and Eggert, Mathias and Schwittay, Sebastian}, title = {Generalizability and Applicability of Model-Based Business Process Compliance-Checking Approaches — A State-of-the-Art Analysis and Research Roadmap}, series = {Business Research : BuR}, volume = {5}, journal = {Business Research : BuR}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {1866-8658}, doi = {10.1007/BF03342739}, pages = {221 -- 247}, year = {2012}, abstract = {With a steady increase of regulatory requirements for business processes, automation support of compliance management is a field garnering increasing attention in Information Systems research. Several approaches have been developed to support compliance checking of process models. One major challenge for such approaches is their ability to handle different modeling techniques and compliance rules in order to enable widespread adoption and application. Applying a structured literature search strategy, we reflect and discuss compliance-checking approaches in order to provide an insight into their generalizability and evaluation. The results imply that current approaches mainly focus on special modeling techniques and/or a restricted set of types of compliance rules. Most approaches abstain from real-world evaluation which raises the question of their practical applicability. Referring to the search results, we propose a roadmap for further research in model-based business process compliance checking.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BeckerEggertSchwittay2012, author = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Eggert, Mathias and Schwittay, Sebastian}, title = {How to Evaluate the Practical Relevance of Business Process Compliance Checking Approaches?}, series = {Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 - Tagungsband der MKWI 2012}, booktitle = {Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 - Tagungsband der MKWI 2012}, editor = {Mattfeld, Dirk Christian}, publisher = {Institut f{\"u}r Wirtschaftsinformatik}, address = {Braunschweig}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:084-13011115376}, pages = {849 -- 862}, year = {2012}, language = {en} }