@article{DachwaldSeboldt2003,
  author    = {Dachwald, Bernd and Seboldt, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Solar sailcraft of the first generation technology development / Seboldt, Wolfgang ; Dachwald, Bernd},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{Dachwald2017,
  author    = {Dachwald, Bernd},
  title     = {Radiation pressure force model for an ideal laser-enhanced solar sail},
  series = {4th International Symposium on Solar Sailing},
  booktitle = {4th International Symposium on Solar Sailing},
  pages     = {1 -- 5},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The concept of a laser-enhanced solar sail is introduced and the radiation pressure force model for an ideal laser-enhanced solar sail is derived. A laser-enhanced solar sail is a "traditional" solar sail that is, however, not solely propelled by solar radiation, but additionally by a laser beam that illuminates the sail. The additional laser radiation pressure increases the sail's propulsive force and can give, depending on the location of the laser source, more control authority over the direction of the solar sail's propulsive force vector. This way, laser-enhanced solar sails may augment already existing solar sail mission concepts and make novel mission concepts feasible.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Schueckhaus2020,
  author    = {Sch{\"u}ckhaus, Ulrich},
  title     = {Die SkyCab-Erfinder im WFMG-Interview},
  series = {Business in MG},
  journal   = {Business in MG},
  number    = {1},
  pages     = {6 -- 7},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{DahmannHagemeisterNageletal.2002,
  author    = {Dahmann, Peter and Hagemeister, W. and Nagel, and Exner,},
  title     = {Geschwindigkeits- und Positionsregelung eines hydraulischen Handlingger{\"a}tes in einem Ziegelwerk durch frequenzgeregelte Innenzahnradpumpe im Mehrquadrantenbetrieb},
  series = {Fluid power focused on applications : 3rd International Fluid Power Conference (3rd IFK) ; [conference proceedings, March 5th and 6th 2002, Aachen, Germany]. Fluidtechnik, Band T3},
  journal   = {Fluid power focused on applications : 3rd International Fluid Power Conference (3rd IFK) ; [conference proceedings, March 5th and 6th 2002, Aachen, Germany]. Fluidtechnik, Band T3},
  publisher = {Shaker},
  address   = {Aachen},
  isbn      = {3-8265-9900-4},
  pages     = {83 -- 94},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{DachwaldOhndorf2019,
  author    = {Dachwald, Bernd and Ohndorf, Andreas},
  title     = {Global optimization of continuous-thrust trajectories using evolutionary neurocontrol},
  series = {Modeling and Optimization in Space Engineering},
  booktitle = {Modeling and Optimization in Space Engineering},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-030-10501-3},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-030-10501-3_2},
  pages     = {33 -- 57},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Searching optimal continuous-thrust trajectories is usually a difficult and time-consuming task. The solution quality of traditional optimal-control methods depends strongly on an adequate initial guess because the solution is typically close to the initial guess, which may be far from the (unknown) global optimum. Evolutionary neurocontrol attacks continuous-thrust optimization problems from the perspective of artificial intelligence and machine learning, combining artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms. This chapter describes the method and shows some example results for single- and multi-phase continuous-thrust trajectory optimization problems to assess its performance. Evolutionary neurocontrol can explore the trajectory search space more exhaustively than a human expert can do with traditional optimal-control methods. Especially for difficult problems, it usually finds solutions that are closer to the global optimum. Another fundamental advantage is that continuous-thrust trajectories can be optimized without an initial guess and without expert supervision.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{DachwaldBaturkinCoverstoneetal.2005,
  author    = {Dachwald, Bernd and Baturkin, Volodymyr and Coverstone, Victoria and Diedrich, Ben and Garbe, Gregory and G{\"o}rlich, Marianne and Leipold, Manfred and Lura, Franz and Macdonald, Malcolm and McInnes, Colin and Mengali, Giovanni and Quarta, Alessandro and Rios-Reyes, Leonel and Scheeres, Daniel J. and Seboldt, Wolfgang and Wie, Bong},
  title     = {Potential effects of optical solar sail degredation on trajectory design},
  series = {AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist},
  booktitle = {AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist},
  pages     = {1 -- 23},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {The optical properties of the thin metalized polymer films that are projected for solar sails are assumed to be affected by the erosive effects of the space environment. Their degradation behavior in the real space environment, however, is to a considerable degree indefinite, because initial ground test results are controversial and relevant inspace tests have not been made so far. The standard optical solar sail models that are currently used for trajectory design do not take optical degradation into account, hence its potential effects on trajectory design have not been investigated so far. Nevertheless, optical degradation is important for high-fidelity solar sail mission design, because it decreases both the magnitude of the solar radiation pressure force acting on the sail and also the sail control authority. Therefore, we propose a simple parametric optical solar sail degradation model that describes the variation of the sail film's optical coefficients with time, depending on the sail film's environmental history, i.e., the radiation dose. The primary intention of our model is not to describe the exact behavior of specific film-coating combinations in the real space environment, but to provide a more general parametric framework for describing the general optical degradation behavior of solar sails. Using our model, the effects of different optical degradation behaviors on trajectory design are investigated for various exemplary missions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GoettenHavermannBraunetal.2019,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Gomez, Francisco and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {RANS Simulation Validation of a Small Sensor Turret for UAVs},
  series = {Journal of Aerospace Engineering},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Journal of Aerospace Engineering},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {ASCE},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1943-5525},
  doi       = {10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001055},
  pages     = {Article number 04019060},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Recent Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) design procedures rely on full aircraft steady-state Reynolds-Averaged-Navier-Stokes (RANS) analyses in early design stages. Small sensor turrets are included in such simulations, even though their aerodynamic properties show highly unsteady behavior. Very little is known about the effects of this approach on the simulation outcomes of small turrets. Therefore, the flow around a model turret at a Reynolds number of 47,400 is simulated with a steady-state RANS approach and compared to experimental data. Lift, drag, and surface pressure show good agreement with the experiment. The RANS model predicts the separation location too far downstream and shows a larger recirculation region aft of the body. Both characteristic arch and horseshoe vortex structures are visualized and qualitatively match the ones found by the experiment. The Reynolds number dependence of the drag coefficient follows the trend of a sphere within a distinct range. The outcomes indicate that a steady-state RANS model of a small sensor turret is able to give results that are useful for UAV engineering purposes but might not be suited for detailed insight into flow properties.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Dachwald2004,
  author    = {Dachwald, Bernd},
  title     = {Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization and Interplanetary Mission Analysis Using Evolutionary Neurocontrol},
  series = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2004 : Dresden, 20. bis 23. September 2004, Motto: Luft- und Raumfahrt - Br{\"u}cke f{\"u}r eine wissensbasierte Gesellschaft / Deutsche Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Luft- und Raumfahrt - Lilienthal-Oberth e.V. (DGLR). [Red.: Peter Brandt (verantwortlich)]. - Bd. 2. - (Jahrbuch ... der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Luft- und Raumfahrt)},
  journal   = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2004 : Dresden, 20. bis 23. September 2004, Motto: Luft- und Raumfahrt - Br{\"u}cke f{\"u}r eine wissensbasierte Gesellschaft / Deutsche Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Luft- und Raumfahrt - Lilienthal-Oberth e.V. (DGLR). [Red.: Peter Brandt (verantwortlich)]. - Bd. 2. - (Jahrbuch ... der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Luft- und Raumfahrt)},
  address   = {Bonn},
  pages     = {917 -- 926},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Finger2016,
  author    = {Finger, Felix},
  title     = {Senkrechtstarter: FH-Absolvent wird f{\"u}r Transportdrohne ausgezeichnet},
  series = {campushunter: das etwas andere Karrieremagazin - Wintersemester 16/17},
  journal   = {campushunter: das etwas andere Karrieremagazin - Wintersemester 16/17},
  number    = {17. Regionalausgabe Aachen},
  publisher = {Campushunter Media},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {2196-9426},
  pages     = {116 -- 117},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LoebSchartnerDachwaldetal.2012,
  author    = {Loeb, Horst Wolfgang and Schartner, Karl-Heinz and Dachwald, Bernd and Ohndorf, Andreas and Seboldt, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Interstellar heliopause probe},
  series = {Труды МАИ},
  journal   = {Труды МАИ},
  number    = {60},
  publisher = {Moskauer Staatliches Luftfahrtinstitut (МАИ)},
  address   = {Moskau},
  pages     = {2 -- 2},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {There is common agreement within the scientific community that in order to understand our local galactic environment it will be necessary to send a spacecraft into the region beyond the solar wind termination shock. Considering distances of 200 AU for a new mission, one needs a spacecraft traveling at a speed of close to 10 AU/yr in order to keep the mission duration in the range of less than 25 yrs, a transfer time postulated by European Space Agency (ESA). Two propulsion options for the mission have been proposed and discussed so far: the solar sail propulsion and the ballistic/radioisotope-electric propulsion (REP). As a further alternative, we here investigate a combination of solar-electric propulsion (SEP) and REP. The SEP stage consists of six 22-cms diameter RIT-22 ion thrusters working with a high specific impulse of 7377 s corresponding to a positive grid voltage of 5 kV. Solar power of 53 kW at begin of mission (BOM) is provided by a lightweight solar array.},
  language  = {en}
}