@inproceedings{BertschMeineckeWolfetal.2019, author = {Bertsch, Timo and Meinecke, Matthias and Wolf, Martin and Schmunk, Karina}, title = {Smart-Living-Services nur gegen Daten? Process-Mining als M{\"o}glichkeit zur Steigerung der Akzeptanz!}, series = {Angewandte Forschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik 2019 : Tagungsband zur 32. AKWI-Jahrestagung / hrsg. von Martin R. Wolf, Thomas Barton, Frank Herrmann, Vera G. Meister, Christian M{\"u}ller, Christian Seel}, booktitle = {Angewandte Forschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik 2019 : Tagungsband zur 32. AKWI-Jahrestagung / hrsg. von Martin R. Wolf, Thomas Barton, Frank Herrmann, Vera G. Meister, Christian M{\"u}ller, Christian Seel}, publisher = {mana-Buch}, address = {Heide}, isbn = {978-3-944330-62-4}, pages = {216 -- 226}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Seit Jahren etablieren sich Technologien in unserem Alltag, die mit Hilfe von smarten Komponenten neue Services und Vernetzungsm{\"o}glichkeiten schaffen. Dieses Paper beschreibt die Ergebnisse einer Studie, die die Akzeptanz von IoT-gest{\"u}tzten, smarten Services im privaten Umfeld untersucht. Dabei wird eine zentrale Datenverarbeitung mit automatisierter Erstellung smarter Services der dezentralen Datenverarbeitung mit manueller Serviceerstellung in sieben Kategorien gegen{\"u}bergestellt. Die Auswertung der Studie legt die Forschungsfrage nahe, ob das Nutzerverhalten im Kontext Smart Living nicht auch mit einem dezentralen L{\"o}sungsansatz, und somit unabh{\"a}ngig von großen Unternehmen, analysiert werden kann. Hierf{\"u}r wird im zweiten Teil des Papers die Anwendbarkeit von Process-Mining im Bereich Smart Living untersucht und prototypisch getestet.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{ZaehlBiewendtWolfetal.2022, author = {Z{\"a}hl, Philipp M. and Biewendt, Marcel and Wolf, Martin and Eggert, Mathias}, title = {Requirements for Competence Developing Games in the Environment of SE Competence Development}, series = {Angewandte Forschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik 2022}, booktitle = {Angewandte Forschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik 2022}, publisher = {GITO}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-95545-409-8}, doi = {10.30844/AKWI_2022_05}, pages = {73 -- 88}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Many of today's factors make software development more and more complex, such as time pressure, new technologies, IT security risks, et cetera. Thus, a good preparation of current as well as future software developers in terms of a good software engineering education becomes progressively important. As current research shows, Competence Developing Games (CDGs) and Serious Games can offer a potential solution. This paper identifies the necessary requirements for CDGs to be conducive in principle, but especially in software engineering (SE) education. For this purpose, the current state of research was summarized in the context of a literature review. Afterwards, some of the identified requirements as well as some additional requirements were evaluated by a survey in terms of subjective relevance.}, language = {en} } @incollection{EggertZaehlWolfetal.2023, author = {Eggert, Mathias and Z{\"a}hl, Philipp M. and Wolf, Martin R. and Haase, Martin}, title = {Applying leaderboards for quality improvement in software development projects}, series = {Software Engineering for Games in Serious Contexts}, booktitle = {Software Engineering for Games in Serious Contexts}, editor = {Cooper, Kendra M.L. and Bucchiarone, Antonio}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-031-33337-8 (Print)}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-33338-5_11}, pages = {243 -- 263}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Software development projects often fail because of insufficient code quality. It is now well documented that the task of testing software, for example, is perceived as uninteresting and rather boring, leading to poor software quality and major challenges to software development companies. One promising approach to increase the motivation for considering software quality is the use of gamification. Initial research works already investigated the effects of gamification on software developers and come to promising. Nevertheless, a lack of results from field experiments exists, which motivates the chapter at hand. By conducting a gamification experiment with five student software projects and by interviewing the project members, the chapter provides insights into the changing programming behavior of information systems students when confronted with a leaderboard. The results reveal a motivational effect as well as a reduction of code smells.}, language = {en} }