@article{MoehrenBergmannJanseretal.2024,
  author    = {M{\"o}hren, Felix and Bergmann, Ole and Janser, Frank and Braun, Carsten},
  title     = {Assessment of structural mechanical effects related to torsional deformations of propellers},
  series = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  journal   = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wien},
  issn      = {1869-5590 (eISSN)},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13272-024-00737-7},
  pages     = {22 Seiten},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Lifting propellers are of increasing interest for Advanced Air Mobility. All propellers and rotors are initially twisted beams, showing significant extension-twist coupling and centrifugal twisting. Torsional deformations severely impact aerodynamic performance. This paper presents a novel approach to assess different reasons for torsional deformations. A reduced-order model runs large parameter sweeps with algebraic formulations and numerical solution procedures. Generic beams represent three different propeller types for General Aviation, Commercial Aviation, and Advanced Air Mobility. Simulations include solid and hollow cross-sections made of aluminum, steel, and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer. The investigation shows that centrifugal twisting moments depend on both the elastic and initial twist. The determination of the centrifugal twisting moment solely based on the initial twist suffers from errors exceeding 5\% in some cases. The nonlinear parts of the torsional rigidity do not significantly impact the overall torsional rigidity for the investigated propeller types. The extension-twist coupling related to the initial and elastic twist in combination with tension forces significantly impacts the net cross-sectional torsional loads. While the increase in torsional stiffness due to initial twist contributes to the overall stiffness for General and Commercial Aviation propellers, its contribution to the lift propeller's stiffness is limited. The paper closes with the presentation of approximations for each effect identified as significant. Numerical evaluations are necessary to determine each effect for inhomogeneous cross-sections made of anisotropic material.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EggertKreuzer2022,
  author    = {Eggert, Mathias and Kreuzer, Vincent},
  title     = {Sprachsteuerung im Gesundheitswesen - Anforderungen und Auswahl geeigneter Anbieter},
  series = {HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik},
  volume    = {59},
  journal   = {HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik},
  publisher = {Springer Vieweg},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {2198-2775},
  issn      = {1436-3011},
  doi       = {10.1365/s40702-022-00919-z},
  pages     = {1640 -- 1652},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Das Gesundheitswesen ist konfrontiert mit steigenden Kosten und einer immer schwieriger werdenden Personalsituation. Zeitgleich versprechen moderne Sprachsteuerungssysteme Prozesse in Arztpraxen und Krankenh{\"a}usern zu verschlanken und Vorg{\"a}nge zu beschleunigen. Dennoch wird derzeit der Einsatz von Sprachsteuerungssystemen in Arztpraxen oder Krankenh{\"a}usern nur selten beobachtet, was auch an den besonders strengen Datenschutzauflagen der Datenschutzgrundverordnung (DSGVO) liegt. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus wirft die niedrige Nutzungsrate die Frage nach den konkreten Anforderungen und ihrer Umsetzbarkeit auf, was durch den vorliegenden Beitrag adressiert wird, indem die Ergebnisse von Interviews mit acht medizinischen Fachexperten ausgewertet werden. Erg{\"a}nzend wird die technische Umsetzbarkeit einzelner Anforderungen mit unterschiedlichen Cloud-Anbietern erprobt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KemptFreyerNagel2022,
  author    = {Kempt, Hendrik and Freyer, Nils and Nagel, Saskia K.},
  title     = {Justice and the normative standards of explainability in healthcare},
  series = {Philosophy \& Technology},
  volume    = {35},
  journal   = {Philosophy \& Technology},
  number    = {Article number: 100},
  publisher = {Springer Nature},
  address   = {Berlin},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13347-022-00598-0},
  pages     = {1 -- 19},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Providing healthcare services frequently involves cognitively demanding tasks, including diagnoses and analyses as well as complex decisions about treatments and therapy. From a global perspective, ethically significant inequalities exist between regions where the expert knowledge required for these tasks is scarce or abundant. One possible strategy to diminish such inequalities and increase healthcare opportunities in expert-scarce settings is to provide healthcare solutions involving digital technologies that do not necessarily require the presence of a human expert, e.g., in the form of artificial intelligent decision-support systems (AI-DSS). Such algorithmic decision-making, however, is mostly developed in resource- and expert-abundant settings to support healthcare experts in their work. As a practical consequence, the normative standards and requirements for such algorithmic decision-making in healthcare require the technology to be at least as explainable as the decisions made by the experts themselves. The goal of providing healthcare in settings where resources and expertise are scarce might come with a normative pull to lower the normative standards of using digital technologies in order to provide at least some healthcare in the first place. We scrutinize this tendency to lower standards in particular settings from a normative perspective, distinguish between different types of absolute and relative, local and global standards of explainability, and conclude by defending an ambitious and practicable standard of local relative explainability.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EggertKling2023,
  author    = {Eggert, Mathias and Kling, Rene},
  title     = {How to distribute charging requests of electronic vehicles? A reservation-based approach},
  series = {International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research},
  number    = {2023},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin, Heidelberg, New York},
  issn      = {1868-8659},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13177-023-00367-z},
  pages     = {437 -- 460},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {The number of electronic vehicles increase steadily while the space for extending the charging infrastructure is limited. In particular in urban areas, where parking spaces in attractive areas are famous, opportunities to setup new charging stations is very limited. This leads to an overload of some very attractive charging stations and an underutilization of less attractive ones. Against this background, the paper at hand presents the design of an e-vehicle reservation system that aims at distributing the utilization of the charging infrastructure, particularly in urban areas. By applying a design science approach, the requirements for a reservation-based utilization approach are elicited and a model for a suitable distribution approach and its instantiation are developed. The artefact is evaluated by simulating the distribution effects based on data of real charging station utilizations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DrummEmhardtKoketal.2020,
  author    = {Drumm, Christian and Emhardt, Selina N. and Kok, Ellen M. and Jarodzka, Halzka and Brand-Gruwel, Saskia and van Gog, Tamara},
  title     = {How Experts Adapt Their Gaze Behavior When Modeling a Task to Novices},
  series = {Cognitive science},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {Cognitive science},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {1551-6709},
  doi       = {10.1111/cogs.12893},
  pages     = {26},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Domain experts regularly teach novice students how to perform a task. This often requires them to adjust their behavior to the less knowledgeable audience and, hence, to behave in a more didactic manner. Eye movement modeling examples (EMMEs) are a contemporary educational tool for displaying experts' (natural or didactic) problem-solving behavior as well as their eye movements to learners. While research on expert-novice communication mainly focused on experts' changes in explicit, verbal communication behavior, it is as yet unclear whether and how exactly experts adjust their nonverbal behavior. This study first investigated whether and how experts change their eye movements and mouse clicks (that are displayed in EMMEs) when they perform a task naturally versus teach a task didactically. Programming experts and novices initially debugged short computer codes in a natural manner. We first characterized experts' natural problem-solving behavior by contrasting it with that of novices. Then, we explored the changes in experts' behavior when being subsequently instructed to model their task solution didactically. Experts became more similar to novices on measures associated with experts' automatized processes (i.e., shorter fixation durations, fewer transitions between code and output per click on the run button when behaving didactically). This adaptation might make it easier for novices to follow or imitate the expert behavior. In contrast, experts became less similar to novices for measures associated with more strategic behavior (i.e., code reading linearity, clicks on run button) when behaving didactically.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EggertMoulen2020,
  author    = {Eggert, Mathias and Moulen, Tobias},
  title     = {Selektion von Gesch{\"a}ftsprozessen zur Anwendung von Robotic Process Automation am Beispiel einer Versicherung},
  series = {HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik},
  volume    = {57},
  journal   = {HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {1436-3011},
  doi       = {10.1365/s40702-020-00665-0},
  pages     = {1150 -- 1162},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {H{\"a}ufig bremsen geringe IT-Ressourcen, fehlende Softwareschnittstellen oder eine veraltete und komplex gewachsene Systemlandschaft die Automatisierung von Gesch{\"a}ftsprozessen. Robotic Process Automation (RPA) ist eine vielversprechende Methode, um Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse oberfl{\"a}chenbasiert und ohne gr{\"o}ßere Systemeingriffe zu automatisieren und Medienbr{\"u}che abzubauen. Die Auswahl der passenden Prozesse ist dabei f{\"u}r den Erfolg von RPA-Projekten entscheidend. Der vorliegende Beitrag liefert daf{\"u}r Selektionskriterien, die aus einer qualitativen Inhaltanalyse von elf Interviews mit RPA-Experten aus dem Versicherungsumfeld resultieren. Das Ergebnis umfasst eine gewichtetet Liste von sieben Dimensionen und 51 Prozesskriterien, welche die Automatisierung mit Softwarerobotern beg{\"u}nstigen bzw. deren Nichterf{\"u}llung eine Umsetzung erschweren oder sogar verhindern. Die drei wichtigsten Kriterien zur Auswahl von Gesch{\"a}ftsprozessen f{\"u}r die Automatisierung mittels RPA umfassen die Entlastung der an dem Prozess mitwirkenden Mitarbeiter (Arbeitnehmer{\"u}berlastung), die Ausf{\"u}hrbarkeit des Prozesses mittels Regeln (Regelbasierte Prozessteuerung) sowie ein positiver Kosten-Nutzen-Vergleich. Praktiker k{\"o}nnen diese Kriterien verwenden, um eine systematische Auswahl von RPA-relevanten Prozessen vorzunehmen. Aus wissenschaftlicher Perspektive stellen die Ergebnisse eine Grundlage zur Erkl{\"a}rung des Erfolgs und Misserfolgs von RPA-Projekten dar.},
  language  = {de}
}