@article{Laack2014,
  author    = {Laack, Walter van},
  title     = {Therefore Fermat is right},
  series = {American journal of humanities and social sciences : AJHSS},
  volume    = {2},
  journal   = {American journal of humanities and social sciences : AJHSS},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {2329-079X (E-Journal); 2329-0781 (Print)},
  pages     = {117 -- 120},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {It was Fernat's idea to investigate how many numbers would fulfill the equation according to the Pythagorean Theorem if the exponent were increased to random, e.g. to a3 + b3 = c3. His question became therefore: are there two whole numbers the cubes of which add up to the volume of the cube of a third whole number? He posed this same question, of course, for all kinds of higher exponents, so that the equation could be generalized: is there an integral solution for the equation an + bn = cn, if the exponent n is higher than 2? Although in 1993, the English mathematician Andrew Wiles was able to produce an arithmetical proof for Fermat's famous theorem, I will show that there is a simple logical explanation which is also pragmatic and plausible and what is the result of a fundamental alternative idea how our world seems to be constructed.},
  language  = {en}
}