@inproceedings{KraftZoell2014,
  author    = {Kraft, Bodo and Z{\"o}ll, Axel},
  title     = {Von der Langstrecke zum Sprint - Agile Methoden in traditionellen Unternehmen},
  series = {Projektmanagement und Vorgehensmodelle 2014 : soziale Aspekte und Standardisierung},
  booktitle = {Projektmanagement und Vorgehensmodelle 2014 : soziale Aspekte und Standardisierung},
  editor    = {Engstler, Martin},
  publisher = {Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address   = {Bonn},
  organization    = {FH Aachen, University of Applied Sciences},
  isbn      = {978-3-88579-630-5},
  pages     = {35 -- 46},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{HeerRedkowitzKraft2008,
  author    = {Heer, Thomas and Redkowitz, Daniel and Kraft, Bodo},
  title     = {Tool Support for the Integration of Light-Weight Ontologies},
  isbn      = {978-3-642-00670-8},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Abstract of the authors: In many areas of computer science ontologies become more and more important. The use of ontologies for domain modeling often brings up the issue of ontology integration. The task of merging several ontologies, covering specific subdomains, into one united ontology has to be solved. Many approaches for ontology integration aim at automating the process of ontology alignment. However, a complete automation is not feasible, and user interaction is always required. Nevertheless, most ontology integration tools offer only very limited support for the interactive part of the integration process. In this paper, we present a novel approach for the interactive integration of ontologies. The result of the ontology integration is incrementally updated after each definition of a correspondence between ontology elements. The user is guided through the ontologies to be integrated. By restricting the possible user actions, the integrity of all defined correspondences is ensured by the tool we developed. We evaluated our tool by integrating different regulations concerning building design.},
  subject      = {Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung>},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{KraftNagl2003,
  author    = {Kraft, Bodo and Nagl, Manfred},
  title     = {Support of Conceptual Design in Civil Engineering by Graph-based Tools},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {WS GTaD-2003 - The 1st Workshop on Graph Transformations and Design ed Grabska, E., Seite 6-7, Jagiellonian University Krakow. 2 pages},
  subject      = {CAD},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Kraft2007,
  author    = {Kraft, Bodo},
  title     = {Semantische Unterst{\"u}tzung des konzeptuellen Geb{\"a}udeentwurfs},
  publisher = {Shaker},
  address   = {Aachen},
  isbn      = {978-3-8322-6045-3},
  pages     = {VIII, 381 S. : Ill., graph. Darst.},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HackerKraftZoell2011,
  author    = {Hacker, Tobias and Kraft, Bodo and Z{\"o}ll, Axel},
  title     = {Projektzuschnitt f{\"u}r die inkrementelle Systementwicklung im Konzernverbund},
  isbn      = {978-3-8322-9990-3},
  pages     = {78 -- 83},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{KraftNagl2004,
  author    = {Kraft, Bodo and Nagl, Manfred},
  title     = {Parameterized specification of conceptual design tools in civil engineering},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2004, Volume 3062/2004, 90-105, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25959-6_7 In this paper we discuss how tools for conceptual design in civil engineering can be developed using graph transformation specifications. These tools consist of three parts: (a) for elaborating specific conceptual knowledge (knowledge engineer), (b) for working out conceptual design results (architect), and (c) automatic consistency analyses which guarantee that design results are consistent with the underlying specific conceptual knowledge. For the realization of such tools we use a machinery based on graph transformations. In a traditional PROGRES tool specification the conceptual knowledge for a class of buildings is hard-wired within the specification. This is not appropriate for the experimentation platform approach we present in this paper, as objects and relations for conceptual knowledge are due to many changes, implied by evaluation of their use and corresponding improvements. Therefore, we introduce a parametric specification method with the following characteristics: (1) The underlying specific knowledge for a class of buildings is not fixed. Instead, it is built up as a data base by using the knowledge tools. (2) The specification for the architect tools also does not incorporate specific conceptual knowledge. (3) An incremental checker guarantees whether a design result is consistent with the current state of the underlying conceptual knowledge (data base).},
  subject      = {CAD},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{KraftRetkowitz2005,
  author    = {Kraft, Bodo and Retkowitz, Daniel},
  title     = {Operationale Semantikdefinition f{\"u}r konzeptuelles Regelwissen},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {In: Forum Bauinformatik 2005 : junge Wissenschaftler forschen / [Lehrstuhl Bauinformatik, Brandenburgische Technische Universit{\"a}t Cottbus. Frank Schley ... (Hrsg.)]. - Cottbus : Techn. Universit{\"a}t 2005. S. 1-10 ISBN 3-934934-11-0 Mittels eines operationalen Ansatzes zur Semantikdefinition wird am Bei-spiel des konzeptuellen Geb{\"a}udeentwurfs ein Regelsystem formalisiert. Dazu werdenzwei Teile, zum einen das Regelwissen, zum anderen ein konzeptueller Entwurfsplan zun{\"a}chst informell eingef{\"u}hrt und dann formal beschrieben. Darauf aufbauend wird die Grundlage f{\"u}r eine Konsistenzpr{\"u}fung des konzeptuellen Entwurfs gegen das Regel-wissen formal angeben},
  subject      = {CAD},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Kraft2003,
  author    = {Kraft, Bodo},
  title     = {LexiCAD Step by Step : B{\"u}rogeb{\"a}ude : Erstellen eines Grundrisses mit RoomObjects und LexiCAD},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {11 Seiten, 22 Abbildungen 1. Konstruktion des Außenumrisses 2. Festlegung der inneren R{\"a}ume 3. Einf{\"u}gen der RoomLinks 4. Wallgenerator},
  subject      = {CAD},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KirchhofKraft2012,
  author    = {Kirchhof, Michael and Kraft, Bodo},
  title     = {Hybrides Vorgehensmodell : Agile und klassische Methoden im Projekt passend kombinieren},
  series = {ProjektMagazin},
  journal   = {ProjektMagazin},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {Berleb Media},
  address   = {Taufkirchen},
  pages     = {11 S.},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Agil ist im Trend und immer mehr Unternehmen, die ihre Projekte bisher nach klassischen Prinzipien durchf{\"u}hrten, denken {\"u}ber den Einsatz agiler Methoden nach. Doch selbst wenn die Organisation bereits beide Philosophien unterst{\"u}tzt, gilt f{\"u}r ein Projekt meist die klare Vorgabe: agil oder klassisch. Es gibt aber noch einen anderen Ansatz, mit diesen "unterschiedlichen Welten" umzugehen: Und zwar die beiden Philosophien innerhalb eines Projekts zu kombinieren. Wie dies in der Praxis aussehen und gelingen kann, zeigen Dr. Michael Kirchhof und Prof. Dr. Bodo Kraft in diesem Beitrag.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KraftNagl2007,
  author    = {Kraft, Bodo and Nagl, Manfred},
  title     = {Graphbasierte Werkzeuge zur Unterst{\"u}tzung des konzeptuellen Geb{\"a}udeentwurfs},
  series = {Vernetzt-kooperative Planungsprozesse im Konstruktiven Ingenieurbau : Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendung und Perspektiven zur vernetzten Ingenieurkooperation / Uwe R{\"u}ppel (Hrsg.)},
  journal   = {Vernetzt-kooperative Planungsprozesse im Konstruktiven Ingenieurbau : Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendung und Perspektiven zur vernetzten Ingenieurkooperation / Uwe R{\"u}ppel (Hrsg.)},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-540-68102-1},
  pages     = {155 -- 175},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}