@article{BeckerDelfmannDietrichetal.2016,
  author    = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Delfmann, Patrick and Dietrich, Hanns-Alexander and Steinhorst, Matthias and Eggert, Mathias},
  title     = {Business Process Compliance Checking — Applying and Evaluating a Generic Pattern Matching Approach for Conceptual Models in the Financial Sector},
  series = {Information Systems Frontiers},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {Information Systems Frontiers},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1572-9419},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10796-014-9529-y},
  pages     = {359 -- 405},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Given the strong increase in regulatory requirements for business processes the management of business process compliance becomes a more and more regarded field in IS research. Several methods have been developed to support compliance checking of conceptual models. However, their focus on distinct modeling languages and mostly linear (i.e., predecessor-successor related) compliance rules may hinder widespread adoption and application in practice. Furthermore, hardly any of them has been evaluated in a real-world setting. We address this issue by applying a generic pattern matching approach for conceptual models to business process compliance checking in the financial sector. It consists of a model query language, a search algorithm and a corresponding modelling tool prototype. It is (1) applicable for all graph-based conceptual modeling languages and (2) for different kinds of compliance rules. Furthermore, based on an applicability check, we (3) evaluate the approach in a financial industry project setting against its relevance for decision support of audit and compliance management tasks.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeverungenEggertVoigtetal.2013,
  author    = {Beverungen, Daniel and Eggert, Mathias and Voigt, Matthias and Rosemann, Michael},
  title     = {Augmenting Analytical CRM Strategies with Social BI},
  series = {International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR)},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR)},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {IGI Global},
  address   = {Hershey},
  issn      = {1947-3591},
  doi       = {10.4018/ijbir.2013070103},
  pages     = {32 -- 49},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EggertKnackstedtFleischeretal.2013,
  author    = {Eggert, Mathias and Knackstedt, Ralf and Fleischer, Stefan and Becker, J{\"o}rg},
  title     = {The Potential of Configurative Reference Modeling for Business to Government Reporting - A Modeling Technique and its Evaluation},
  series = {e-Service Journal},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {e-Service Journal},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Indiana University Press},
  address   = {Bloomington},
  issn      = {1528-8234},
  pages     = {28 -- 59},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeckerDelfmannEggertetal.2012,
  author    = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Delfmann, Patrick and Eggert, Mathias and Schwittay, Sebastian},
  title     = {Generalizability and Applicability of Model-Based Business Process Compliance-Checking Approaches — A State-of-the-Art Analysis and Research Roadmap},
  series = {Business Research : BuR},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Business Research : BuR},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {1866-8658},
  doi       = {10.1007/BF03342739},
  pages     = {221 -- 247},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {With a steady increase of regulatory requirements for business processes, automation support of compliance management is a field garnering increasing attention in Information Systems research. Several approaches have been developed to support compliance checking of process models. One major challenge for such approaches is their ability to handle different modeling techniques and compliance rules in order to enable widespread adoption and application. Applying a structured literature search strategy, we reflect and discuss compliance-checking approaches in order to provide an insight into their generalizability and evaluation. The results imply that current approaches mainly focus on special modeling techniques and/or a restricted set of types of compliance rules. Most approaches abstain from real-world evaluation which raises the question of their practical applicability. Referring to the search results, we propose a roadmap for further research in model-based business process compliance checking.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BerneckerKlierSternetal.2018,
  author    = {Bernecker, Andreas and Klier, Julia and Stern, Sebastian and Thiel, Lea},
  title     = {Sustaining high performance beyond public-sector pilot projects.},
  number    = {September 2018},
  organization    = {McKinsey\&Company},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DethloffKrollLudwigs2006,
  author    = {Dethloff, Nina and Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin},
  title     = {The Constitutional Court as Driver of Reforms in German Family Law},
  series = {International Survey of Family Law},
  journal   = {International Survey of Family Law},
  pages     = {217 -- 234},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DethloffKrollLudwigs2008,
  author    = {Dethloff, Nina and Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin},
  title     = {Strengthening Children's Rights in German Family Law},
  series = {The International Survey of Family Law},
  journal   = {The International Survey of Family Law},
  pages     = {119 -- 136},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrollLudwigs2007,
  author    = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin},
  title     = {The Reform of German Maintenance Law},
  series = {The International Survey of Family Law},
  journal   = {The International Survey of Family Law},
  pages     = {85 -- 100},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchneiderTran2015,
  author    = {Schneider, Felix and Tran, Duc Hung},
  title     = {On the relation between the fair value option and bid-ask spreads: descriptive evidence on the recognition of credit risk changes under IFRS},
  series = {Journal of Business Economics},
  volume    = {85},
  journal   = {Journal of Business Economics},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1861-8928},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11573-015-0776-2},
  pages     = {1049 -- 1081},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Tran2014,
  author    = {Tran, Duc Hung},
  title     = {Multiple corporate governance attributes and the cost of capital - Evidence from Germany},
  series = {The British Accounting Review},
  volume    = {46},
  journal   = {The British Accounting Review},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0890-8389},
  doi       = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.02.003},
  pages     = {179 -- 197},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {This paper investigates the extent to which corporate governance affects the cost of debt and equity capital of German exchange-listed companies. I examine corporate governance along three dimensions: financial information quality, ownership structure and board structure. The results suggest that firms with high levels of financial transparency and bonus compensations face lower cost of equity. In addition, block ownership is negatively related to firms' cost of equity when the blockholders are other firms, managers or founding-family members. Consistent with the conjecture that agency costs increase with firm size, I find significant cost of debt effects only in the largest German companies. Here, the creditors demand lower cost of debt from firms with block ownerships held by corporations or banks. My findings demonstrate that a uniform set of governance attributes is unlikely to satisfy suppliers of debt and equity capital equally.},
  language  = {en}
}