@article{Grap1995,
  author    = {Grap, Rolf Dietmar},
  title     = {Fra gruppearbejde til den l{\ae}rende organisation : Gruppearbejde er finrmen kun et skridt p{\aa} vejen mod den l{\ae}rende organisation},
  series = {Ledelese i Dag. 5 (1995), H. 3},
  journal   = {Ledelese i Dag. 5 (1995), H. 3},
  pages     = {56 -- 65},
  year      = {1995},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LindemannSchmid1999,
  author    = {Lindemann, Markus and Schmid, Beat F.},
  title     = {Framework for specifying, building and operating electronic markets},
  series = {International journal of electronic commerce. Vol. 3 (1998/99), No. 2},
  journal   = {International journal of electronic commerce. Vol. 3 (1998/99), No. 2},
  issn      = {1086-4415},
  pages     = {7 -- 21},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EggertAlberts2020,
  author    = {Eggert, Mathias and Alberts, Jens},
  title     = {Frontiers of business intelligence and analytics 3.0: a taxonomy-based literature review and research agenda},
  series = {Business Research},
  volume    = {2020},
  journal   = {Business Research},
  number    = {13},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {2198-2627},
  doi       = {10.1007/s40685-020-00108-y},
  pages     = {685 -- 739},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Researching the field of business intelligence and analytics (BI \& A) has a long tradition within information systems research. Thereby, in each decade the rapid development of technologies opened new room for investigation. Since the early 1950s, the collection and analysis of structured data were the focus of interest, followed by unstructured data since the early 1990s. The third wave of BI \& A comprises unstructured and sensor data of mobile devices. The article at hand aims at drawing a comprehensive overview of the status quo in relevant BI \& A research of the current decade, focusing on the third wave of BI \& A. By this means, the paper's contribution is fourfold. First, a systematically developed taxonomy for BI \& A 3.0 research, containing seven dimensions and 40 characteristics, is presented. Second, the results of a structured literature review containing 75 full research papers are analyzed by applying the developed taxonomy. The analysis provides an overview on the status quo of BI \& A 3.0. Third, the results foster discussions on the predicted and observed developments in BI \& A research of the past decade. Fourth, research gaps of the third wave of BI \& A research are disclosed and concluded in a research agenda.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Timme1999,
  author    = {Timme, Michael},
  title     = {Frustrierte Aufwendungen und Schadensersatz wegen Nichterf{\"u}llung},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Schadensrecht. Vol. 20 (1999), H. No. 12},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Schadensrecht. Vol. 20 (1999), H. No. 12},
  pages     = {502 -- 504},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MischkeNeuss2009,
  author    = {Mischke, Winfried and Neuß, Frank},
  title     = {F{\"u}hrt die {\"U}bernahme der Domain eines anderen Unternehmers zur Haftung f{\"u}r dessen Schulden nach \S 25 HGB?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Vertragsgestaltung, Schuld- und Haftungsrecht : ZGS},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Vertragsgestaltung, Schuld- und Haftungsrecht : ZGS},
  publisher = {ZAP, Verl. f. die Rechts- und Anwaltspraxis},
  address   = {Recklinghausen},
  issn      = {1619-7011},
  pages     = {407 -- 409},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HoepnerJanz2008,
  author    = {Hoepner, Gert and Janz, Norbert},
  title     = {Ganzheit als schl{\"u}ssiges System},
  series = {Acquisa - Das Magazin f{\"u}r Marketing und Vertieb. 11 (2008), H. 1},
  journal   = {Acquisa - Das Magazin f{\"u}r Marketing und Vertieb. 11 (2008), H. 1},
  isbn      = {0938-7927},
  pages     = {44 -- 47},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Golland2019,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Gemeinsam einsam: Ein „Like" f{\"u}r die gemeinsame Verantwortlichkeit?},
  series = {ZD Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Datenschutz},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {ZD Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Datenschutz},
  number    = {9},
  editor    = {Hoeren, Thomas and Schneider, Jochen and Selmayr, Martin and Spies, Axel and Wybitul, Tim},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {2192-5593},
  pages     = {381 -- 382},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Golland2018,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Gemeinsame Verantwortlichkeit in mehrstufigen Verarbeitungsszenarien},
  volume    = {21},
  number    = {7-8},
  publisher = {dfv Mediengruppe},
  address   = {Frankfurt a.M.},
  issn      = {1434-6354},
  pages     = {433 -- 438},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Die Rechtsfigur der gemeinsamen Verantwortlichkeit besch{\"a}ftigt die datenschutzrechtliche Literatur seit Langem. Die Bestimmung der Verantwortlichkeit bei arbeitsteiligen Verarbeitungsverfahren, welche vor allem bei heutigen Plattformdiensten {\"u}blich sind, ist komplex: Stets sind mehrere Akteure beteiligt und in der Regel werden durch die Handlung eines Beteiligten mehrere Verarbeitungsschritte ausgel{\"o}st. Nun hat sich der EuGH in einem in mehrfacher Hinsicht bemerkenswerten Urteil ge{\"a}ußert.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BeckerDelfmannEggertetal.2012,
  author    = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Delfmann, Patrick and Eggert, Mathias and Schwittay, Sebastian},
  title     = {Generalizability and Applicability of Model-Based Business Process Compliance-Checking Approaches — A State-of-the-Art Analysis and Research Roadmap},
  series = {Business Research : BuR},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Business Research : BuR},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {1866-8658},
  doi       = {10.1007/BF03342739},
  pages     = {221 -- 247},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {With a steady increase of regulatory requirements for business processes, automation support of compliance management is a field garnering increasing attention in Information Systems research. Several approaches have been developed to support compliance checking of process models. One major challenge for such approaches is their ability to handle different modeling techniques and compliance rules in order to enable widespread adoption and application. Applying a structured literature search strategy, we reflect and discuss compliance-checking approaches in order to provide an insight into their generalizability and evaluation. The results imply that current approaches mainly focus on special modeling techniques and/or a restricted set of types of compliance rules. Most approaches abstain from real-world evaluation which raises the question of their practical applicability. Referring to the search results, we propose a roadmap for further research in model-based business process compliance checking.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Frings1988,
  author    = {Frings, Michael},
  title     = {Gerichtsstand bei Wohnraumvermittlung zum Zweck der Weitervermietung, LG-Aachen},
  series = {Neue juristische Wochenschrift : NJW / NJW-Rechtsprechungs-Report Zivilrecht : NJW-RR (1988)},
  journal   = {Neue juristische Wochenschrift : NJW / NJW-Rechtsprechungs-Report Zivilrecht : NJW-RR (1988)},
  isbn      = {0179-4043},
  pages     = {914},
  year      = {1988},
  language  = {de}
}