@article{StaatHeitzer2000,
  author    = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M.},
  title     = {Reliability Analysis of Elasto-Plastic Structures under Variable Loads},
  series = {Inelastic analysis of structures under variable loads : theory and engineering applications / Maier, G.; Weichert, D. [ed]},
  journal   = {Inelastic analysis of structures under variable loads : theory and engineering applications / Maier, G.; Weichert, D. [ed]},
  publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publ.},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  isbn      = {0-7923-6645-X},
  pages     = {269 -- 288},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HacklLeschingerStaatetal.2016,
  author    = {Hackl, Michael and Leschinger, T. and Staat, Manfred and M{\"u}ller, Lars-Peter and Wegmann, Kilian},
  title     = {Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane in the Essex Lopresti lesion — a biomechanical evaluation},
  series = {Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy},
  volume    = {Volume 24},
  journal   = {Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy},
  number    = {Supplement 1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0942-2056},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00167-016-4080-7},
  pages     = {130 -- 131},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Surgical reconstruction of the interosseous membrane (IOM) could restore longitudinal forearm stability to avoid persisting disability due to capituloradial and ulnocarpal impingement in Essex Lopresti lesions. This biomechanical study aimed to assess longitudinal forearm stability of intact specimens, after sectioning of the IOM and after reconstruction with a TightRope construct using either a single or double bundle technique.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HacklWegmannKahmannetal.2017,
  author    = {Hackl, Michael and Wegmann, Kilian and Kahmann, Stephanie Lucina and Heinze, Nicolai and Staat, Manfred and Neiss, Wolfram F. and Scaal, Martin and M{\"u}ller, Lars P.},
  title     = {Radial shortening osteotomy reduces radiocapitellar contact pressures while preserving valgus stability of the elbow},
  series = {Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy},
  number    = {7},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1433-7347},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00167-017-4468-z},
  pages     = {2280 -- 2288},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HacklMuellerStaatetal.2016,
  author    = {Hackl, Michael and M{\"u}ller, Lars-Peter and Staat, Manfred and Kahmann, Stephanie Lucina and Wegmann, Kilian},
  title     = {Proximal phalangeal neck fractures of the hand — a biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques},
  series = {Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy},
  volume    = {Volume 24},
  journal   = {Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy},
  number    = {Supplement 1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0942-2056},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00167-016-4080-7},
  pages     = {148 -- 149},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Plate osteosynthesis of displaced proximal phalangeal neck fractures of the hand allows early mobilization due to a stable internal fixation. Nevertheless, joint stiffness—because of soft tissue irritation—represents a common complication leading to high complication rates. Del Pinal et al. recently reported promising clinical results for a new, minimally invasive fixation technique with a cannulated headless intramedullary compression screw. Hence, the aim of this study was to compare plate fixation of proximal phalangeal neck fractures to less two less invasive techniques: Crossed k-wire fixation and intramedullary screw fixation. We hypothesized that these fixation techniques provide inferior stability when compared to plate osteosynthesis.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Staat1996,
  author    = {Staat, Manfred},
  title     = {Problems and Chances for Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics in the Analysis of Steel Pressure Boundary Reliability},
  series = {Technical feasibility and reliability of passive safety systems for nuclear power plants. Proceedings of an Advisory Group Meeting held in J{\"u}lich, 21-24 November 1994},
  journal   = {Technical feasibility and reliability of passive safety systems for nuclear power plants. Proceedings of an Advisory Group Meeting held in J{\"u}lich, 21-24 November 1994},
  address   = {Vienna},
  pages     = {43 -- 55},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Staat1992,
  author    = {Staat, Manfred},
  title     = {Probabilistische Bewertung des bruchmechanischen Verhaltens der Prim{\"a}rkreisdruckumschließung eines HTR-Moduls},
  year      = {1992},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{StaatHeitzer2003,
  author    = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M.},
  title     = {Probabilistic limit and shakedown problems},
  series = {Numerical Methods for Limit and Shakedown Analysis. Deterministic and Probabilistic Approach. NIC Series Vol. 15 / Ed. by Staat, M; Heitzer, M.},
  journal   = {Numerical Methods for Limit and Shakedown Analysis. Deterministic and Probabilistic Approach. NIC Series Vol. 15 / Ed. by Staat, M; Heitzer, M.},
  publisher = {John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC)},
  address   = {J{\"u}lich},
  isbn      = {3-00-010001-6},
  pages     = {217 -- 268},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TranKreissigStaat2009,
  author    = {Tran, Thanh Ngoc and Kreißig, R. and Staat, Manfred},
  title     = {Probabilistic limit and shakedown analysis of thin plates and shells},
  series = {Structural safety. 31 (2009), H. 1},
  journal   = {Structural safety. 31 (2009), H. 1},
  publisher = {-},
  isbn      = {0167-4730},
  pages     = {1 -- 18},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Staat1996,
  author    = {Staat, Manfred},
  title     = {Probabilistic assessment of the fracture mechanics behaviour of an HTR-module primary circuit pressure boundary},
  series = {Nuclear Engineering and Design. 160 (1996), H. 1-2},
  journal   = {Nuclear Engineering and Design. 160 (1996), H. 1-2},
  isbn      = {0029-5493},
  pages     = {221 -- 236},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RauschKahmannBaltschunetal.2020,
  author    = {Rausch, Valentin and Kahmann, Stephanie Lucina and Baltschun, Christoph and Staat, Manfred and M{\"u}ller, Lars P. and Wegmann, Kilian},
  title     = {Pressure distribution to the distal biceps tendon at the radial tuberosity: a biomechanical study},
  series = {The Journal of Hand Surgery},
  volume    = {45},
  journal   = {The Journal of Hand Surgery},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0363-5023},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.006},
  pages     = {776.e1 -- 776.e9},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose Mechanical impingement at the narrow radioulnar space of the tuberosity is believed to be an etiological factor in the injury of the distal biceps tendon. The aim of the study was to compare the pressure distribution at the proximal radioulnar space between 2 fixation techniques and the intact state. Methods Six right arms and 6 left arms from 5 female and 6 male frozen specimens were used for this study. A pressure transducer was introduced at the height of the radial tuberosity with the intact distal biceps tendon and after 2 fixation methods: the suture-anchor and the cortical button technique. The force (N), maximum pressure (kPa) applied to the radial tuberosity, and the contact area (mm²) of the radial tuberosity with the ulna were measured and differences from the intact tendon were detected from 60° supination to 60° pronation in 15° increments with the elbow in full extension and in 45° and 90° flexion of the elbow. Results With the distal biceps tendon intact, the pressures during pronation were similar regardless of extension and flexion and were the highest at 60° pronation with 90° elbow flexion (23.3 ± 53.5 kPa). After repair of the tendon, the mean peak pressure, contact area, and total force showed an increase regardless of the fixation technique. Highest peak pressures were found using the cortical button technique at 45° flexion of the elbow and 60° pronation. These differences were significantly different from the intact tendon. The contact area was significantly larger in full extension and 15°, 30°, and 60° pronation using the cortical button technique. Conclusions Pressures on the distal biceps tendon at the radial tuberosity increase during pronation, especially after repair of the tendon. Clinical relevance Mechanical impingement could play a role in both the etiology of primary distal biceps tendon ruptures and the complications occurring after fixation of the tendon using certain techniques.},
  language  = {en}
}