@article{GollandEngling2015, author = {Golland, Alexander and Engling, Christoph}, title = {Offene und geschlossene WLAN: Rechtliche H{\"u}rden bei Betrieb eines {\"o}ffentlichen Internetzugangs}, series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater}, volume = {39}, journal = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater}, number = {5}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {G{\"u}tersloh}, issn = {0170-7256}, pages = {102 -- 103}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{Golland2014, author = {Golland, Alexander}, title = {Datenschutz durch modulare Zertifizierung: Trusted Cloud-Pilotprojekt bringt neuen Ansatz}, series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater}, volume = {38}, journal = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater}, number = {10}, publisher = {dfv Mediengruppe}, address = {Frankfurt a.M.}, isbn = {0170-7256}, pages = {213 -- 215}, year = {2014}, language = {de} } @article{GollandEngling2014, author = {Golland, Alexander and Engling, Christoph}, title = {a-i3/BSI Symposium 2014: Sicherheit von Daten und Identit{\"a}ten angesichts NSA und Big Data}, series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater}, volume = {38}, journal = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater}, number = {7-8}, publisher = {dfv Mediengruppe}, address = {Frankfurt a.M.}, isbn = {0170-7256}, pages = {165 -- 166}, year = {2014}, language = {de} } @article{MuellerSeginWeigandetal.2022, author = {Mueller, Tobias and Segin, Alexander and Weigand, Christoph and Schmitt, Robert H.}, title = {Feature selection for measurement models}, series = {International journal of quality \& reliability management}, journal = {International journal of quality \& reliability management}, number = {Vol. ahead-of-print, No. ahead-of-print.}, publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited}, address = {Bingley}, issn = {0265-671X}, doi = {10.1108/IJQRM-07-2021-0245}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Purpose In the determination of the measurement uncertainty, the GUM procedure requires the building of a measurement model that establishes a functional relationship between the measurand and all influencing quantities. Since the effort of modelling as well as quantifying the measurement uncertainties depend on the number of influencing quantities considered, the aim of this study is to determine relevant influencing quantities and to remove irrelevant ones from the dataset. Design/methodology/approach In this work, it was investigated whether the effort of modelling for the determination of measurement uncertainty can be reduced by the use of feature selection (FS) methods. For this purpose, 9 different FS methods were tested on 16 artificial test datasets, whose properties (number of data points, number of features, complexity, features with low influence and redundant features) were varied via a design of experiments. Findings Based on a success metric, the stability, universality and complexity of the method, two FS methods could be identified that reliably identify relevant and irrelevant influencing quantities for a measurement model. Originality/value For the first time, FS methods were applied to datasets with properties of classical measurement processes. The simulation-based results serve as a basis for further research in the field of FS for measurement models. The identified algorithms will be applied to real measurement processes in the future.}, language = {en} } @article{Timme2022, author = {Timme, Michael}, title = {Beweislast beim gutgl{\"a}ubigen Erwerb eines Kraftfahrzeugs ohne Erhalt der Zulassungsbescheinigung Teil II — Zugleich eine Besprechung von BGH, Urt. v. 23.9.2022 - V ZR 148/21, MDR 2022, 1542}, series = {Monatsschrift f{\"u}r Deutsches Recht}, volume = {77}, journal = {Monatsschrift f{\"u}r Deutsches Recht}, number = {1}, publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, issn = {0340-1812}, doi = {doi.org/10.9785/mdtr-2023-770102}, pages = {r5 -- r7}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Im Handel mit Kraftfahrzeugen geh{\"o}ren Aspekte des gutgl{\"a}ubigen Erwerbs zu den beinahe allt{\"a}glichen Standardproblemen. Der BGH f{\"u}gt in seiner Entscheidung v. 23.9.2022-VZR148/21, MDR 2022, 1541 diesem im Detail breit gef{\"a}cherten Themenfeld einen weiteren Mosaikstein hinzu: Der Erwerber erhielt das verkaufte Kfz ohne {\"U}bergabe einer Zulassungsbescheinigung Teil II, behauptet aber, diese Bescheinigung sei dem vom ihm eingeschalteten Vermittler bei Erwerb (als F{\"a}lschung) vorgelegt worden. Tats{\"a}chlich befand sich das Original durchg{\"a}ngig beim wahren Eigent{\"u}mer, der nunmehr Herausgabe des Fahrzeugs verlangt. Der BGH sch{\"u}tzt in dieser Gestaltung im Ergebnis den Erwerber. Die Entscheidung ist in mehrfacher Hinsicht bemerkenswert.}, language = {de} } @article{BruksleChwallekKrastina2023, author = {Bruksle, Ieva and Chwallek, Constanze and Krastina, Anzelika}, title = {Strengthening sustainability in entrepreneurship education - implications for shifting entrepreneurial thinking towards sustainability at universities}, series = {ACTA PROSPERITATIS}, volume = {14}, journal = {ACTA PROSPERITATIS}, number = {1}, publisher = {Sciendo}, issn = {1691-6077}, doi = {10.37804/1691-6077-2023-14-37-48}, pages = {37 -- 48}, year = {2023}, abstract = {By developing innovative solutions to social and environmental problems, sustainable ventures carry greatpotential. Entrepreneurship which focuses especially on new venture creation can be developed through education anduniversities, in particular, are called upon to provide an impetus for social change. But social innovations are associatedwith certain hurdles, which are related to the multi-dimensionality, i.e. the tension between creating social,environmental and economic value and dealing with a multiplicity of stakeholders. The already complex field ofentrepreneurship education has to face these challenges. This paper, therefore, aims to identify starting points for theintegration of sustainability into entrepreneurship education. To pursue this goal experiences from three differentproject initiatives between the partner universities: Lapland University of Applied Sciences, FH Aachen University ofApplied Sciences and Turiba University are reflected and findings are systematically condensed into recommendationsfor education on sustainable entrepreneurship.}, language = {en} } @article{Timme2023, author = {Timme, Michael}, title = {Die Erbringung einer Leistung in der irrigen Vorstellung einer Bestellung (Zu BGH, MDR 2023, 1439)}, series = {Monatsschrift f{\"u}r Deutsches Recht}, volume = {77}, journal = {Monatsschrift f{\"u}r Deutsches Recht}, number = {24}, publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, issn = {2194-4202 (online)}, doi = {10.9785/mdtr-2023-772402}, pages = {R293 -- R296}, year = {2023}, language = {de} } @article{KemptFreyerNagel2022, author = {Kempt, Hendrik and Freyer, Nils and Nagel, Saskia K.}, title = {Justice and the normative standards of explainability in healthcare}, series = {Philosophy \& Technology}, volume = {35}, journal = {Philosophy \& Technology}, number = {Article number: 100}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, doi = {10.1007/s13347-022-00598-0}, pages = {1 -- 19}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Providing healthcare services frequently involves cognitively demanding tasks, including diagnoses and analyses as well as complex decisions about treatments and therapy. From a global perspective, ethically significant inequalities exist between regions where the expert knowledge required for these tasks is scarce or abundant. One possible strategy to diminish such inequalities and increase healthcare opportunities in expert-scarce settings is to provide healthcare solutions involving digital technologies that do not necessarily require the presence of a human expert, e.g., in the form of artificial intelligent decision-support systems (AI-DSS). Such algorithmic decision-making, however, is mostly developed in resource- and expert-abundant settings to support healthcare experts in their work. As a practical consequence, the normative standards and requirements for such algorithmic decision-making in healthcare require the technology to be at least as explainable as the decisions made by the experts themselves. The goal of providing healthcare in settings where resources and expertise are scarce might come with a normative pull to lower the normative standards of using digital technologies in order to provide at least some healthcare in the first place. We scrutinize this tendency to lower standards in particular settings from a normative perspective, distinguish between different types of absolute and relative, local and global standards of explainability, and conclude by defending an ambitious and practicable standard of local relative explainability.}, language = {en} } @article{Golland2023, author = {Golland, Alexander}, title = {Immaterieller Schadensersatz bei Datenschutzverst{\"o}ßen - EuGH tariert aus}, series = {NWB - Steuer- und Wirtschaftsrecht}, volume = {2023}, journal = {NWB - Steuer- und Wirtschaftsrecht}, number = {26}, publisher = {NWB Verlag}, address = {Herne}, issn = {0028-3460}, pages = {1845 -- 1845}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Umsatzbasierte Bußgelder - wie sonst nur aus dem Kartellrecht bekannt - waren einer der Gr{\"u}nde, warum die Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DSGVO) vor ihrem Inkrafttreten f{\"u}r erhebliches Aufsehen sorgte. Die vielfach relevanteren Schadensersatzanspr{\"u}che, die, wie bei „Dieselgate", aufgrund der Vielzahl von betroffenen Personen und der aus Sicht von Rechtsdienstleistern bestehenden Skalierbarkeit mit weitaus h{\"o}heren Einbußen f{\"u}r Unternehmen einhergehen k{\"o}nnen, blieben zun{\"a}chst unbeachtet. Inzwischen ist der Schadensersatzanspruch gem. Art. 82 DSGVO die Vorschrift, die die meisten Vorlagen zum Europ{\"a}ischen Gerichtshof (EuGH) der letzten Jahre hervorgerufen hat. Am 4.5.2023 hat nun der EuGH (Urteil v. 4.5.2023 - Rs. C-300/21, NWB GAAAJ-41389) in einem Grundsatzurteil {\"u}ber zentrale Fragen rund um den Ersatz immaterieller Sch{\"a}den als Folge von Datenschutzverst{\"o}ßen entschieden.}, language = {de} } @article{OhrtmannGolland2023, author = {Ohrtmann, Jan-Peter and Golland, Alexander}, title = {Datenschutz \& Datenrecht - ein Ausblick auf 2023: Nationale Entwicklungen, EuGH-Vorlagen \& Aufsicht}, series = {Datenschutz-Berater (DSB)}, volume = {2023}, journal = {Datenschutz-Berater (DSB)}, number = {3}, publisher = {Fachmedien Recht und Wirtschaft}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, pages = {73 -- 75}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Die Verfasser vermitteln einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber die nationalen Gesetzgebungsverfahren und wesentliche EuGH-Vorlagefragen betreffend den Datenschutz und das Datenrecht f{\"u}r das Jahr 2023. Zun{\"a}chst folgen u.a. Hinweise in Bezug auf den Hinweisgeberschutz, die Verabschiedung der Einwilligungsverwaltungs-Verordnung zur Konkretisierung des \S 26 TTDSG und das Mobilit{\"a}tsdatengesetz. Anschließend werden Vorlagefragen deutscher Gerichte, die dem EuGH vorgelegt und bereits am 12.01.2023 beantwortet wurden, wie etwa C-154/21 und C-132/21 und die EuGH-Entscheidung vom 9.2.2023 (C-453/21), thematisiert. {\"U}berdies f{\"u}hren die Autoren wesentliche Entscheidungen des EuGH an, die im Jahr 2023 aus dem Bereich Datenrecht und Datenschutz zu erwarten seien. Auch Aktivit{\"a}ten der Datenschutzaufsicht auf nationaler und europ{\"a}ischer Ebene finden Erw{\"a}hnung. Die Verfasser machen abschließend auf besonders interessante Entscheidungen, die 2023 erwartet werden, wie etwa das EuGH-Urteil zum Auskunftsanspruch, sowie auf das Verh{\"a}ltnis des der Whistleblowing-RL umzusetzende Hinweisgeberschutzgesetz einerseits und Vorgaben des Datenschutzes andererseits, aufmerksam. Sie empfehlen, die k{\"u}nftige Rechtsprechung des EuGH im Blick zu behalten.}, language = {de} }