@article{KearneyHerrmannNavaetal.2003,
  author    = {Kearney, D. and Herrmann, Ulf and Nava, P. and Kelly, B. and Mahoney, R. and Pacheco, J. and Cable, R. and Potrovitza, N. and Blake, D. and Price, H.},
  title     = {Assessment of a Molten Salt Heat Transfer Fluid in a Parabolic Trough Solar Field},
  series = {Journal of Solar Energy Engineering},
  volume    = {125},
  journal   = {Journal of Solar Energy Engineering},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {1528-8986},
  doi       = {10.1115/1.1565087},
  pages     = {170 -- 176},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HerrmannSchwarzenbartDittmannGabriel2019,
  author    = {Herrmann, Ulf and Schwarzenbart, Marc and Dittmann-Gabriel, S{\"o}ren},
  title     = {Speicher statt Kohle. Integration thermischer Stromspeicher in vorhandene Kraftwerksstandorte},
  series = {BWK : Das Energie-Fachmagazin},
  volume    = {71},
  journal   = {BWK : Das Energie-Fachmagazin},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Springer-VDI-Verl.},
  address   = {D{\"u}sseldorf},
  issn      = {1436-4883},
  pages     = {42 -- 45},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WoliszSchuetzBlankeetal.2017,
  author    = {Wolisz, Henryk and Sch{\"u}tz, Thomas and Blanke, Tobias and Hagenkamp, Markus and Kohrn, Markus and Wesseling, Mark and M{\"u}ller, Dirk},
  title     = {Cost optimal sizing of smart buildings' energy system components considering changing end-consumer electricity markets},
  series = {Energy},
  volume    = {137},
  journal   = {Energy},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.025},
  pages     = {715 -- 728},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RegerKuhnhenneEbbertetal.2020,
  author    = {Reger, Vitali and Kuhnhenne, Markus and Ebbert, Thiemo and Hachul, Helmut and Blanke, Tobias and D{\"o}ring, Bernd},
  title     = {Nutzung erneuerbarer Energien durch thermische Aktivierung von Komponenten aus Stahl},
  series = {Stahlbau},
  volume    = {2020},
  journal   = {Stahlbau},
  number    = {Volume 89, Issue 6512-519},
  publisher = {Ernst \& Sohn},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1437-1049},
  doi       = {10.1002/stab.202000031},
  pages     = {512 -- 519},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Die Versorgung von Neubauten soll m{\"o}glichst weitgehend unabh{\"a}ngig von fossilen Energietr{\"a}gern erfolgen. Erneuerbare Energien spielen daf{\"u}r eine gewichtige Rolle. Eine gute M{\"o}glichkeit, erneuerbare Energien ohne viel zus{\"a}tzlichen Aufwand nutzbar zu machen, ist, bereits vorhandenen Komponenten im Geb{\"a}ude zus{\"a}tzliche Funktionen zu geben. Hier kann bspw. die Fassade oder das Dach solarthermisch aktiviert oder durch Fotovoltaikmodule erg{\"a}nzt werden. Auch Tiefgr{\"u}ndungen k{\"o}nnen neben der statischen Funktion noch eine geothermische Funktion zur Aufnahme oder Abgabe von W{\"a}rme erhalten. Neben der Erzeugung bietet sich auch f{\"u}r die Verteilung der W{\"a}rme oder K{\"a}lte im Geb{\"a}ude die Integration in Bauteile an. Hier kann bspw. der Boden durch eine Fußbodenheizung oder die Decke durch Deckenstrahlplatten aktiviert werden. Im Rahmen der Ver{\"o}ffentlichung wird auf die thermische Aktivierung von Stahlkomponenten eingegangen. Es wird eine L{\"o}sung vorgestellt, die vorgeh{\"a}ngte hinterl{\"u}ftete Stahlfassade (VHF) solarthermisch zu aktivieren. Außerdem werden zwei M{\"o}glichkeiten zur geothermischen Aktivierung von Tiefgr{\"u}ndungen mittels Stahlpf{\"a}hlen gezeigt. Zuletzt wird ein System zur thermischen Aktivierung von Stahltrapezprofilen an der Decke erl{\"a}utert, welches W{\"a}rme zuf{\"u}hren oder bei Bedarf abf{\"u}hren kann.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BlankeRegerDoeringetal.2021,
  author    = {Blanke, Tobias and Reger, Vitali and D{\"o}ring, Bernd and G{\"o}ttsche, Joachim and Kuhnhenne, Markus},
  title     = {Koaxiale Stahlenergiepf{\"a}hle},
  series = {Stahlbau},
  volume    = {90. 2021},
  journal   = {Stahlbau},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  pages     = {417 -- 424},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Ein entscheidender Teil der Energiewende ist die W{\"a}rmewende im Geb{\"a}udesektor. Ein Schl{\"u}sselelement sind hier W{\"a}rmepumpen. Diese ben{\"o}tigen eine W{\"a}rmequelle, der sie Energie entziehen k{\"o}nnen, um sie auf ein h{\"o}heres Temperaturniveau zu transformieren. Diese W{\"a}rmequelle kann bspw. das Erdreich sein, dessen W{\"a}rme durch Erdsonden erschlossen werden kann. In diesem Beitrag werden in Stahlpf{\"a}hle integrierte Koaxialsonden mit dem Stand der Technik von Erdsonden gleichen Durchmessers bez{\"u}glich ihrer thermischen Leistungsmerkmale verglichen. Die Stahlenergiepf{\"a}hle bieten neben der W{\"a}rmegewinnung weitere Vorteile, da sie auch eine statische Funktion {\"u}bernehmen und r{\"u}ckstandsfrei zur{\"u}ckgebaut werden k{\"o}nnen. Es werden analytische und numerische Berechnungen vorgestellt, um die thermischen Potenziale beider Systeme zu vergleichen. Außerdem wird ein Testaufbau gezeigt, bei dem Stahlenergiepf{\"a}hle in zwei verschiedenen L{\"a}ngen mit vorhandenen g{\"a}ngigen Erdsonden verglichen werden k{\"o}nnen. Die Berechnungen zeigen einen deutlichen thermischen Mehrertrag zwischen 26 \% und 148 \% der Stahlenergiepf{\"a}hle gegen{\"u}ber dem Stand der Technik abh{\"a}ngig vom Erdreich. Die Messergebnisse zeigen einen thermischen Mehrertrag von {\"u}ber 100 \%. Es l{\"a}sst sich also signifikante Erdsondenl{\"a}nge einsparen. Dabei ist zu beachten, dass sich damit der thermisch genutzte Bereich des Erdreichs reduziert, wodurch die thermische Regeneration und/oder das Langzeitverhalten des Erdreichs an Bedeutung gewinnt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RegerKuhnhenneHachuletal.2019,
  author    = {Reger, Vitali and Kuhnhenne, Markus and Hachul, Helmut and D{\"o}ring, Bernd and Blanke, Tobias and G{\"o}ttsche, Joachim},
  title     = {Plusenergiegeb{\"a}ude 2.0 in Stahlleichtbauweise},
  series = {Stahlbau},
  volume    = {88},
  journal   = {Stahlbau},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Ernst \& Sohn},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1437-1049 (E-journal), 0038-9145 (print)},
  doi       = {10.1002/stab.201900034},
  pages     = {522 -- 528},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SattlerRoegerSchwarzboezletal.2020,
  author    = {Sattler, Johannes, Christoph and R{\"o}ger, Marc and Schwarzb{\"o}zl, Peter and Buck, Reiner and Macke, Ansgar and Raeder, Christian and G{\"o}ttsche, Joachim},
  title     = {Review of heliostat calibration and tracking control methods},
  series = {Solar Energy},
  volume    = {207},
  journal   = {Solar Energy},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.030},
  pages     = {110 -- 132},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Large scale central receiver systems typically deploy between thousands to more than a hundred thousand heliostats. During solar operation, each heliostat is aligned individually in such a way that the overall surface normal bisects the angle between the sun's position and the aim point coordinate on the receiver. Due to various tracking error sources, achieving accurate alignment ≤1 mrad for all the heliostats with respect to the aim points on the receiver without a calibration system can be regarded as unrealistic. Therefore, a calibration system is necessary not only to improve the aiming accuracy for achieving desired flux distributions but also to reduce or eliminate spillage. An overview of current larger-scale central receiver systems (CRS), tracking error sources and the basic requirements of an ideal calibration system is presented. Leading up to the main topic, a description of general and specific terms on the topics heliostat calibration and tracking control clarifies the terminology used in this work. Various figures illustrate the signal flows along various typical components as well as the corresponding monitoring or measuring devices that indicate or measure along the signal (or effect) chain. The numerous calibration systems are described in detail and classified in groups. Two tables allow the juxtaposition of the calibration methods for a better comparison. In an assessment, the advantages and disadvantages of individual calibration methods are presented.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ElMoussaouiTalbiAtmaneetal.2020,
  author    = {El Moussaoui, Noureddine and Talbi, Sofian and Atmane, Ilyas and Kassmi, Khalil and Schwarzer, Klemens and Chayeb, Hamid and Bachiri, Najib},
  title     = {Feasibility of a new design of a Parabolic Trough Solar Thermal Cooker (PSTC)},
  series = {Solar Energy},
  volume    = {201},
  journal   = {Solar Energy},
  number    = {Vol. 201 (May 2020)},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0038-092X},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.079},
  pages     = {866 -- 871},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In this article, we describe the structure, the functioning, and the tests of parabolic trough solar thermal cooker (PSTC). This oven is designed to meet the needs of rural residents, including Urban, which requires stable cooking temperatures above 200 °C. The cooking by this cooker is based on the concentration of the sun's rays on a glass vacuum tube and heating of the oil circulate in a big tube, located inside the glass tube. Through two small tubes, associated with large tube, the heated oil, rise and heats the pot of cooking pot containing the food to be cooked (capacity of 5 kg). This cooker is designed in Germany and extensively tested in Morocco for use by the inhabitants who use wood from forests. During a sunny day, having a maximum solar radiation around 720 W/m2 and temperature ambient around 26 °C, maximum temperatures recorded of the small tube, the large tube and the center of the pot are respectively: 370 °C, 270 °C and 260 °C. The cooking process with food at high (fries, ..), we show that the cooking oil temperature rises to 200 °C, after 1 h of heating, the cooking is done at a temperature of 120 °C for 20 min. These temperatures are practically stable following variations and decreases in the intensity of irradiance during the day. The comparison of these results with those of the literature shows an improvement of 30-50 \% on the maximum value of the temperature with a heat storage that could reach 60 min of autonomy. All the results obtained show the good functioning of the PSTC and the feasibility of cooking food at high temperature (>200 °C).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DammSauerbornFendetal.2017,
  author    = {Damm, Marc Andr{\´e} and Sauerborn, Markus and Fend, Thomas and Herrmann, Ulf},
  title     = {Optimisation of a urea selective catalytic reduction system with a coated ceramic mixing element},
  series = {Journal of ceramic science and technology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Journal of ceramic science and technology},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {G{\"o}ller},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {2190-9385 (Print)},
  issn      = {2190-9385 (Online)},
  doi       = {10.4416/JCST2016-00056},
  pages     = {19 -- 24},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AlexopoulosHoffschmidt2017,
  author    = {Alexopoulos, Spiros and Hoffschmidt, Bernhard},
  title     = {Advances in solar tower technology},
  series = {Wiley interdisciplinary reviews : Energy and Environment : WIREs},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Wiley interdisciplinary reviews : Energy and Environment : WIREs},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {2041-840X},
  doi       = {10.1002/wene.217},
  pages     = {1 -- 19},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}