@article{FerreinSchifferBooysenetal.2016,
  author    = {Ferrein, Alexander and Schiffer, Stefan and Booysen, T. and Stopforth, R.},
  title     = {Why it is harder to run RoboCup in South Africa: Experiences from German South African collaborations},
  series = {International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems},
  number    = {5},
  issn      = {1729-8806},
  doi       = {10.1177/1729881416662789},
  pages     = {1 -- 13},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Robots are widely used as a vehicle to spark interest in science and technology in learners. A number of initiatives focus on this issue, for instance, the Roberta Initiative, the FIRST Lego League, the World Robot Olympiad and RoboCup Junior. Robotic competitions are valuable not only for school learners but also for university students, as the RoboCup initiative shows. Besides technical skills, the students get some project exposure and experience what it means to finish their tasks on time. But qualifying students for future high-tech areas should not only be for students from developed countries. In this article, we present our experiences with research and education in robotics within the RoboCup initiative, in Germany and South Africa; we report on our experiences with trying to get the RoboCup initiative in South Africa going. RoboCup has a huge support base of academic institutions in Germany; this is not the case in South Africa. We present our 'north-south' collaboration initiatives in RoboCup between Germany and South Africa and discuss some of the reasons why we think it is harder to run RoboCup in South Africa.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{HarzheimHeuermannMarso2016,
  author    = {Harzheim, Thomas and Heuermann, Holger and Marso, Michel},
  title     = {An Adaptive Biasing Method for SRD Comb Generators},
  series = {2016 German Microwave Conference (GeMiC)},
  booktitle = {2016 German Microwave Conference (GeMiC)},
  publisher = {IEEE},
  doi       = {10.1109/GEMIC.2016.7461613},
  pages     = {289 -- 292},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{BroennerHoefkenSchuba2016,
  author    = {Broenner, Simon and H{\"o}fken, Hans-Wilhelm and Schuba, Marko},
  title     = {Streamlining extraction and analysis of android RAM images},
  series = {Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on information systems security and privacy},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on information systems security and privacy},
  organization    = {ICISSP International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy <2, 2016, Rome, Italy>},
  isbn      = {978-989-758-167-0},
  doi       = {10.5220/0005652802550264},
  pages     = {255 -- 264},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FerreinSteinbauer2016,
  author    = {Ferrein, Alexander and Steinbauer, Gerald},
  title     = {20 Years of RoboCup - A Subjective Retrospection},
  series = {KI - K{\"u}nstliche Intelligenz},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {KI - K{\"u}nstliche Intelligenz},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1610-1987},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13218-016-0449-5},
  pages     = {225 -- 232},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {This summer, RoboCup competitions were held for the 20th time in Leipzig, Germany. It was the second time that RoboCup took place in Germany, 10 years after the 2006 RoboCup in Bremen. In this article, we give an overview on the latest developments of RoboCup and what happened in the different leagues over the last decade. With its 20th edition, RoboCup clearly is a success story and a role model for robotics competitions. From our personal view point, we acknowledge this by giving a retrospection about what makes RoboCup such a success.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchmidtForkmannSinkeetal.2016,
  author    = {Schmidt, K. and Forkmann, K. and Sinke, C. and Gratz, M. and Bitz, Andreas and Bingel, U.},
  title     = {The differential effect of trigeminal vs. peripheral pain stimulation on visual processing and memory encoding is influenced by pain-related fear},
  series = {NeuroImage},
  volume    = {134},
  journal   = {NeuroImage},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1053-8119},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.026},
  pages     = {386 -- 395},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Compared to peripheral pain, trigeminal pain elicits higher levels of fear, which is assumed to enhance the interruptive effects of pain on concomitant cognitive processes. In this fMRI study we examined the behavioral and neural effects of trigeminal (forehead) and peripheral (hand) pain on visual processing and memory encoding. Cerebral activity was measured in 23 healthy subjects performing a visual categorization task that was immediately followed by a surprise recognition task. During the categorization task subjects received concomitant noxious electrical stimulation on the forehead or hand. Our data show that fear ratings were significantly higher for trigeminal pain. Categorization and recognition performance did not differ between pictures that were presented with trigeminal and peripheral pain. However, object categorization in the presence of trigeminal pain was associated with stronger activity in task-relevant visual areas (lateral occipital complex, LOC), memory encoding areas (hippocampus and parahippocampus) and areas implicated in emotional processing (amygdala) compared to peripheral pain. Further, individual differences in neural activation between the trigeminal and the peripheral condition were positively related to differences in fear ratings between both conditions. Functional connectivity between amygdala and LOC was increased during trigeminal compared to peripheral painful stimulation. Fear-driven compensatory resource activation seems to be enhanced for trigeminal stimuli, presumably due to their exceptional biological relevance.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BankOrzadaSmitsetal.2015,
  author    = {Bank, Bart L. van de and Orzada, Stephan and Smits, Frits and Lagemaat, Miriam W. and Rodgers, Christopher T. and Bitz, Andreas and Scheenen, Tom W. J.},
  title     = {Optimized (31) P MRS in the human brain at 7 T with a dedicated RF coil setup},
  series = {NMR in Biomedicine},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {NMR in Biomedicine},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {1099-1492},
  doi       = {10.1002/nbm.3422},
  pages     = {1570 -- 1578},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NoureddineBitzLaddetal.2015,
  author    = {Noureddine, Yacine and Bitz, Andreas and Ladd, Mark E. and Th{\"u}rling, Markus and Ladd, Susanne C. and Schaefers, Gregor and Kraff, Oliver},
  title     = {Experience with magnetic resonance imaging of human subjects with passive implants and tattoos at 7 T: a retrospective study},
  series = {Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1352-8661},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10334-015-0499-y},
  pages     = {577 -- 590},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LagemaatBreukelsVosetal.2016,
  author    = {Lagemaat, Miriam W. and Breukels, Vincent and Vos, Eline K. and B., Adam and Uden, Mark J. van and Orzada, Stephan and Bitz, Andreas and Maas, Marnix C. and Scheenen, Tom W. J.},
  title     = {¹H MR spectroscopic imaging of the prostate at 7T using spectral-spatial pulses},
  series = {Magnetic Resonance in Medicine},
  volume    = {75},
  journal   = {Magnetic Resonance in Medicine},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine},
  issn      = {1522-2594},
  doi       = {10.1002/mrm.25569},
  pages     = {933 -- 945},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Purpose To assess the feasibility of prostate ¹H MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) using low-power spectral-spatial (SPSP) pulses at 7T, exploiting accurate spectral selection and spatial selectivity simultaneously. Methods A double spin-echo sequence was equipped with SPSP refocusing pulses with a spectral selectivity of 1 ppm. Three-dimensional prostate ¹H-MRSI at 7T was performed with the SPSP-MRSI sequence using an 8-channel transmit array coil and an endorectal receive coil in three patients with prostate cancer and in one healthy subject. No additional water or lipid suppression pulses were used. Results Prostate ¹H-MRSI could be obtained well within specific absorption rate (SAR) limits in a clinically feasible time (10 min). Next to the common citrate signals, the prostate spectra exhibited high spermine signals concealing creatine and sometimes also choline. Residual lipid signals were observed at the edges of the prostate because of limitations in spectral and spatial selectivity. Conclusion It is possible to perform prostate ¹H-MRSI at 7T with a SPSP-MRSI sequence while using separate transmit and receive coils. This low-SAR MRSI concept provides the opportunity to increase spatial resolution of MRSI within reasonable scan times.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VosLagemaatBarentszetal.2014,
  author    = {Vos, E. K. and Lagemaat, M. W. and Barentsz, J. O. and F{\"u}tterer, J. J. and Zamecnik, P. and Roozen, H. and Orzada, S. and Bitz, Andreas and Maas, M. C. and Scheenen, T. W. J.},
  title     = {Image quality and cancer visibility of T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the prostate at 7 Tesla},
  series = {European Radiology},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {European Radiology},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  issn      = {1432-1084},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00330-014-3234-6},
  pages     = {1950 -- 1958},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Objectives To assess the image quality of T2-weighted (T2w) magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate and the visibility of prostate cancer at 7 Tesla (T). Materials \& methods Seventeen prostate cancer patients underwent T2w imaging at 7T with only an external transmit/receive array coil. Three radiologists independently scored images for image quality, visibility of anatomical structures, and presence of artefacts. Krippendorff's alpha and weighted kappa statistics were used to assess inter-observer agreement. Visibility of prostate cancer lesions was assessed by directly linking the T2w images to the confirmed location of prostate cancer on histopathology. Results T2w imaging at 7T was achievable with 'satisfactory' (3/5) to 'good' (4/5) quality. Visibility of anatomical structures was predominantly scored as 'satisfactory' (3/5) and 'good' (4/5). If artefacts were present, they were mostly motion artefacts and, to a lesser extent, aliasing artefacts and noise. Krippendorff's analysis revealed an α = 0.44 between three readers for the overall image quality scores. Clinically significant cancer lesions in both peripheral zone and transition zone were visible at 7T. Conclusion T2w imaging with satisfactory to good quality can be routinely acquired, and cancer lesions were visible in patients with prostate cancer at 7T using only an external transmit/receive body array coil.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LagemaatMaasVosetal.2015,
  author    = {Lagemaat, Miriam W. and Maas, Marnix C. and Vos, Eline K. and Bitz, Andreas and Orzada, Stephan and Weiland, Elisabeth and Uden, Mark J. van and Kobus, Thiele and Heerschap, Arend and Scheenen, Tom W. J.},
  title     = {(31) P MR spectroscopic imaging of the human prostate at 7 T: T1 relaxation times, Nuclear Overhauser Effect, and spectral characterization},
  series = {Magnetic Resonance in Medicine},
  volume    = {73},
  journal   = {Magnetic Resonance in Medicine},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {1522-2594},
  doi       = {10.1002/mrm.25209},
  pages     = {909 -- 920},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}