@inproceedings{KnackstedtEggertHeddieretal.2013,
  author    = {Knackstedt, Ralf and Eggert, Mathias and Heddier, Marcel and Chasin, Friedrich and Becker, J{\"o}rg},
  title     = {The Relationship Of Is And Law - The Perspective Of And Implications For IS Research},
  series = {ECIS 2013 Completed Research. 18},
  booktitle = {ECIS 2013 Completed Research. 18},
  pages     = {13 S.},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeckerDelfmannEggertetal.2012,
  author    = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Delfmann, Patrick and Eggert, Mathias and Schwittay, Sebastian},
  title     = {Generalizability and Applicability of Model-Based Business Process Compliance-Checking Approaches — A State-of-the-Art Analysis and Research Roadmap},
  series = {Business Research : BuR},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Business Research : BuR},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {1866-8658},
  doi       = {10.1007/BF03342739},
  pages     = {221 -- 247},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {With a steady increase of regulatory requirements for business processes, automation support of compliance management is a field garnering increasing attention in Information Systems research. Several approaches have been developed to support compliance checking of process models. One major challenge for such approaches is their ability to handle different modeling techniques and compliance rules in order to enable widespread adoption and application. Applying a structured literature search strategy, we reflect and discuss compliance-checking approaches in order to provide an insight into their generalizability and evaluation. The results imply that current approaches mainly focus on special modeling techniques and/or a restricted set of types of compliance rules. Most approaches abstain from real-world evaluation which raises the question of their practical applicability. Referring to the search results, we propose a roadmap for further research in model-based business process compliance checking.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{BeckerEggertHeddieretal.2012,
  author    = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Eggert, Mathias and Heddier, Marcel and Knackstedt, Ralf},
  title     = {Merging Conceptual Modeling and Law for Legally Compliant Information Systems Design - A Framework-Based Research Agenda},
  series = {45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2012},
  booktitle = {45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2012},
  isbn      = {978-0-7695-4525-7},
  doi       = {10.1109/HICSS.2012.428},
  pages     = {5241 -- 5248},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{BeckerEggertSchwittay2012,
  author    = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Eggert, Mathias and Schwittay, Sebastian},
  title     = {How to Evaluate the Practical Relevance of Business Process Compliance Checking Approaches?},
  series = {Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 - Tagungsband der MKWI 2012},
  booktitle = {Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 - Tagungsband der MKWI 2012},
  editor    = {Mattfeld, Dirk Christian},
  publisher = {Institut f{\"u}r Wirtschaftsinformatik},
  address   = {Braunschweig},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:084-13011115376},
  pages     = {849 -- 862},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BerneckerKlierSternetal.2018,
  author    = {Bernecker, Andreas and Klier, Julia and Stern, Sebastian and Thiel, Lea},
  title     = {Sustaining high performance beyond public-sector pilot projects.},
  number    = {September 2018},
  organization    = {McKinsey\&Company},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{BerneckerBoyerGathmann2018,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Bernecker, Andreas and Boyer, Pierre and Gathmann, Christina},
  title     = {The Role of Electoral Incentives for Policy Innovation: Evidence from the US Welfare Reform},
  series = {CESifo Working Paper},
  journal   = {CESifo Working Paper},
  number    = {No. 6964},
  organization    = {CESifo Group Munich},
  issn      = {ISSN 2364-1428 (electronic version)},
  pages     = {60},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{HammerViethMaier2005,
  author    = {Hammer, Andreas and Vieth, Matthias and Maier, Frank},
  title     = {Co-Plot as a new multivariate analysis method for operations management research?},
  series = {Papers of the 12th International EurOMA Conference on Operational and Global Competitiveness, Budapest, Hungary, June 19-22, 2005 / Editor: Krisztina Demeter},
  booktitle = {Papers of the 12th International EurOMA Conference on Operational and Global Competitiveness, Budapest, Hungary, June 19-22, 2005 / Editor: Krisztina Demeter},
  isbn      = {963-218-455-6},
  pages     = {1007 -- 1016},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DethloffKrollLudwigs2006,
  author    = {Dethloff, Nina and Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin},
  title     = {The Constitutional Court as Driver of Reforms in German Family Law},
  series = {International Survey of Family Law},
  journal   = {International Survey of Family Law},
  pages     = {217 -- 234},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DethloffKrollLudwigs2008,
  author    = {Dethloff, Nina and Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin},
  title     = {Strengthening Children's Rights in German Family Law},
  series = {The International Survey of Family Law},
  journal   = {The International Survey of Family Law},
  pages     = {119 -- 136},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrollLudwigs2007,
  author    = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin},
  title     = {The Reform of German Maintenance Law},
  series = {The International Survey of Family Law},
  journal   = {The International Survey of Family Law},
  pages     = {85 -- 100},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}