@article{MelissSelzerZiesing1991,
  author    = {Meliß, Michael and Selzer, H. and Ziesing, H. J.},
  title     = {CO2-Reduktionspotentiale erneuerbarer Energiequellen},
  series = {Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen. Jg. 41 (1991), H. 5},
  journal   = {Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen. Jg. 41 (1991), H. 5},
  issn      = {0013-743X ; 0720-6240},
  pages     = {291 -- 299},
  year      = {1991},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MelissSpaete2000,
  author    = {Meliß, Michael and Sp{\"a}te, Frank},
  title     = {The solar heating system with seasonal storage at the Solar-Campus J{\"u}lich},
  series = {Solar energy. Vol. 69 (2000), iss. 6},
  journal   = {Solar energy. Vol. 69 (2000), iss. 6},
  issn      = {0038-092X},
  pages     = {525 -- 533},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MelissSpaete1995,
  author    = {Meliß, Michael and Sp{\"a}te, Frank},
  title     = {Erneuerbare Energien sollen in die Bresche springen. Geld, Kraft und politisches Wollen ist gefragt},
  series = {VDI-Nachrichten. Nr. 46 vom 17.11.1995},
  journal   = {VDI-Nachrichten. Nr. 46 vom 17.11.1995},
  issn      = {0042-1758},
  pages     = {33},
  year      = {1995},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MelissSpaete1996,
  author    = {Meliß, Michael and Sp{\"a}te, Frank},
  title     = {Sonne, Wind und Biomasse zur umweltfreundlichen Energieversorgung},
  series = {Wohnung + Gesundheit. Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r {\"o}kologisches Bauen + Leben. 18 (1996), Nr. 79},
  journal   = {Wohnung + Gesundheit. Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r {\"o}kologisches Bauen + Leben. 18 (1996), Nr. 79},
  issn      = {0176-0513},
  pages     = {47 -- 50},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MelissWiesner1996,
  author    = {Meliß, Michael and Wiesner, W.},
  title     = {Schwerpunkte der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Solar NRW. Dezentrale Energiesysteme sowie Test und Qualifizierung},
  series = {Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen. Jg. 46 (1996), H. 10},
  journal   = {Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen. Jg. 46 (1996), H. 10},
  pages     = {648 -- 655},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MelissWindheim1977,
  author    = {Meliß, Michael and Windheim, R.},
  title     = {Energiequelle f{\"u}r morgen : M{\"o}glichkeiten und Grenzen der Windenergienutzung - ein Statusbericht},
  series = {VDI-Nachrichten. Bd. 31 (1977), H. 22},
  journal   = {VDI-Nachrichten. Bd. 31 (1977), H. 22},
  issn      = {0042-1758},
  pages     = {37 -- 38},
  year      = {1977},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MeyerHaenelBeehetal.2020,
  author    = {Meyer, S. and H{\"a}nel, Matthias and Beeh, B. and Dittmann-Gabriel, S{\"o}ren and Dluhosch, R. and May, Martin and Herrmann, Ulf},
  title     = {Multifunktionaler thermischer Stromspeicher f{\"u}r die Strom- und W{\"a}rmeversorgung der Industrie von morgen},
  series = {ETG Journal / Energietechnische Gesellschaft im VDE (ETG)},
  volume    = {2020},
  journal   = {ETG Journal / Energietechnische Gesellschaft im VDE (ETG)},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {2625-9907},
  pages     = {6 -- 9},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{PeereBlanke2022,
  author    = {Peere, Wouter and Blanke, Tobias},
  title     = {GHEtool: An open-source tool for borefield sizing in Python},
  series = {Journal of Open Source Software},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Journal of Open Source Software},
  number    = {76},
  editor    = {Vernon, Chris},
  issn      = {2475-9066},
  doi       = {10.21105/joss.04406},
  pages     = {1 -- 4, 4406},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {GHEtool is a Python package that contains all the functionalities needed to deal with borefield design. It is developed for both researchers and practitioners. The core of this package is the automated sizing of borefield under different conditions. The sizing of a borefield is typically slow due to the high complexity of the mathematical background. Because this tool has a lot of precalculated data, GHEtool can size a borefield in the order of tenths of milliseconds. This sizing typically takes the order of minutes. Therefore, this tool is suited for being implemented in typical workflows where iterations are required. GHEtool also comes with a graphical user interface (GUI). This GUI is prebuilt as an exe-file because this provides access to all the functionalities without coding. A setup to install the GUI at the user-defined place is also implemented and available at: https://www.mech.kuleuven.be/en/tme/research/thermal_systems/tools/ghetool.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PuppeGiulianoFrantzetal.2018,
  author    = {Puppe, Michael and Giuliano, Stefano and Frantz, Cathy and Uhlig, Ralf and Schumacher, Ralph and Ibraheem, Wagdi and Schmalz, Stefan and Waldmann, Barbara and Guder, Christoph and Peter, Dennis and Schwager, Christian and Teixeira Boura, Cristiano Jos{\´e} and Alexopoulos, Spiros and Spiegel, Michael and Wortmann, J{\"u}rgen and Hinrichs, Matthias and Engelhard, Manfred and Aust, Michael},
  title     = {Techno-economic optimization of molten salt solar tower plants},
  series = {AIP Conference Proceedings art.no. 040033},
  volume    = {2033},
  journal   = {AIP Conference Proceedings art.no. 040033},
  number    = {Issue 1},
  publisher = {AIP Publishing},
  address   = {Melville, NY},
  doi       = {10.1063/1.5067069},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In this paper the results of a techno-economic analysis of improved and optimized molten salt solar tower plants (MSSTP plants) are presented. The potential improvements that were analyzed include different receiver designs, different designs of the HTF-system and plant control, increased molten salt temperatures (up to 640°C) and multi-tower systems. Detailed technological and economic models of the solar field, solar receiver and high temperature fluid system (HTF-system) were developed and used to find potential improvements compared to a reference plant based on Solar Two technology and up-to-date cost estimations. The annual yield model calculates the annual outputs and the LCOE of all variants. An improved external tubular receiver and improved HTF-system achieves a significant decrease of LCOE compared to the reference. This is caused by lower receiver cost as well as improvements of the HTF-system and plant operation strategy, significantly reducing the plant own consumption. A novel star receiver shows potential for further cost decrease. The cavity receiver concepts result in higher LCOE due to their high investment cost, despite achieving higher efficiencies. Increased molten salt temperatures seem possible with an adapted, closed loop HTF-system and achieve comparable results to the original improved system (with 565°C) under the given boundary conditions. In this analysis all multi tower systems show lower economic viability compared to single tower systems, caused by high additional cost for piping connections and higher cost of the receivers. REFERENCES},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RauAlexopoulosBreitbachetal.2014,
  author    = {Rau, Christoph and Alexopoulos, Spiros and Breitbach, Gerd and Hoffschmidt, Bernhard and Latzke, Markus and Sattler, Johannes, Christoph},
  title     = {Transient simulation of a solar-hybrid tower power plant with open volumetric receiver at the location Barstow},
  series = {Energy procedia : proceedings of the SolarPACES 2013 International Conference},
  volume    = {49},
  journal   = {Energy procedia : proceedings of the SolarPACES 2013 International Conference},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1876-6102},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.157},
  pages     = {1481 -- 1490},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {In this work the transient simulations of four hybrid solar tower power plant concepts with open-volumetric receiver technology for a location in Barstow-Daggett, USA, are presented. The open-volumetric receiver uses ambient air as heat transfer fluid and the hybridization is realized with a gas turbine. The Rankine cycle is heated by solar-heated air and/or by the gas turbine's flue gases. The plant can be operated in solar-only, hybrid parallel or combined cycle-only mode as well as in any intermediate load levels where the solar portion can vary between 0 to 100\%. The simulated plant is based on the configuration of a solar-hybrid power tower project, which is in planning for a site in Northern Algeria. The meteorological data for Barstow-Daggett was taken from the software meteonorm. The solar power tower simulation tool has been developed in the simulation environment MATLAB/Simulink and is validated.},
  language  = {en}
}