@inproceedings{PothMonzonTippkoetteretal.2010,
  author    = {Poth, Sebastian and Monzon, Magaly and Tippk{\"o}tter, Nils and Ulber, Roland},
  title     = {Lignocellulosic biorefinery : process integration of hydrolysis and fermentation},
  series = {Proceedings / 11th European Workshop on Lignocellulosics and Pulp : August 16 - 19, 2010, Hamburg, Germany},
  booktitle = {Proceedings / 11th European Workshop on Lignocellulosics and Pulp : August 16 - 19, 2010, Hamburg, Germany},
  publisher = {vTi},
  address   = {Hamburg},
  pages     = {65 -- 68},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PothMonzonTippkoetteretal.2011,
  author    = {Poth, Sebastian and Monzon, Magaly and Tippk{\"o}tter, Nils and Ulber, Roland},
  title     = {Lignocellulosic biorefinery: Process integration of hydrolysis and fermentation (SSF process)},
  series = {Holzforschung},
  volume    = {65},
  journal   = {Holzforschung},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  pages     = {633 -- 637},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {The aim of the present work is the process integration and the optimization of the enzymatic hydrolysis of wood and the following fermentation of the products to ethanol. The substrate is a fiber fraction obtained by organosolv pre-treatment of beech wood. For the ethanol production, a co-fermentation by two different yeasts (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pachysolen tannophilus) was carried out to convert glucose as well as xylose. Two approaches has been followed: 1. A two step process, in which the hydrolysis of the fiber fraction and the fermentation to product are separated from each other. 2. A process, in which the hydrolysis and the fermentation are carried out in one single process step as simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF). Following the first approach, a yield of about 0.15 g ethanol per gram substrate can be reached. Based on the SSF, one process step can be saved, and additionally, the gained yield can be raised up to 0.3 g ethanol per gram substrate.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{StaatHeitzerYanetal.2000,
  author    = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M. and Yan, Ai-Min and Khoi, Vu Duc and Nguyen, Dang Hung and Valdoire, F. and Lahousse, A.},
  title     = {Limit Analysis of Defects},
  publisher = {Forschungszentrum J{\"u}lich},
  address   = {J{\"u}lich},
  issn      = {0944-2952},
  pages     = {89 S.},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StaatVu2012,
  author    = {Staat, Manfred and Vu, Duc Khoi},
  title     = {Limit analysis of flaws in pressurized pipes and cylindrical vessels Part II: Circumferential defects},
  series = {Engineering Fracture Mechanic},
  volume    = {97},
  journal   = {Engineering Fracture Mechanic},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0013-7944},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.05.017},
  pages     = {314 -- 333},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Upper and lower bound theorems of limit analyses have been presented in part I of the paper. Part II starts with the finite element discretization of these theorems and demonstrates how both can be combined in a primal-dual optimization problem. This recently proposed numerical method is used to guide the development of a new class of closed-form limit loads for circumferential defects, which show that only large defects contribute to plastic collapse with a rapid loss of strength with increasing crack sizes. The formulae are compared with primal-dual FEM limit analyses and with burst tests. Even closer predictions are obtained with iterative limit load solutions for the von Mises yield function and for the Tresca yield function. Pressure loading of the faces of interior cracks in thick pipes reduces the collapse load of circumferential defects more than for axial flaws. Axial defects have been treated in part I of the paper.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StaatVu2007,
  author    = {Staat, Manfred and Vu, Duc-Khoi},
  title     = {Limit analysis of flaws in pressurized pipes and cylindrical vessels. Part I: Axial defects},
  series = {Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 74 (2007), H. 3},
  journal   = {Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 74 (2007), H. 3},
  isbn      = {0013-7944},
  pages     = {431 -- 450},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StaatHeitzer1997,
  author    = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M.},
  title     = {Limit and Shakedown Analysis for Plastic Safety of Complex Structures},
  series = {Transactions of the 14th International Conference on Structural Dynamics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT-14) / Livolant, M. [ed]},
  journal   = {Transactions of the 14th International Conference on Structural Dynamics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT-14) / Livolant, M. [ed]},
  address   = {Lyon},
  pages     = {33 -- 40},
  year      = {1997},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Tran2008,
  author    = {Tran, Thanh Ngoc},
  title     = {Limit and shakedown analysis of plates and shells including uncertainties},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{TranTrinhDaoetal.2022,
  author    = {Tran, Ngoc Trinh and Trinh, Tu Luc and Dao, Ngoc Tien and Giap, Van Tan and Truong, Manh Khuyen and Dinh, Thuy Ha and Staat, Manfred},
  title     = {Limit and shakedown analysis of structures under random strength},
  series = {Proceedings of (NACOME2022) The 11th National Conference on Mechanics, Vol. 1. Solid Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Artificial Intelligence, Teaching and Training},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of (NACOME2022) The 11th National Conference on Mechanics, Vol. 1. Solid Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Artificial Intelligence, Teaching and Training},
  publisher = {Nha xuat ban Khoa hoc tu nhien va Cong nghe (Verlag Naturwissenschaft und Technik)},
  address   = {Hanoi},
  isbn      = {978-604-357-084-7},
  pages     = {510 -- 518},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Direct methods comprising limit and shakedown analysis is a branch of computational mechanics. It plays a significant role in mechanical and civil engineering design. The concept of direct method aims to determinate the ultimate load bearing capacity of structures beyond the elastic range. For practical problems, the direct methods lead to nonlinear convex optimization problems with a large number of variables and onstraints. If strength and loading are random quantities, the problem of shakedown analysis is considered as stochastic programming. This paper presents a method so called chance constrained programming, an effective method of stochastic programming, to solve shakedown analysis problem under random condition of strength. In this our investigation, the loading is deterministic, the strength is distributed as normal or lognormal variables.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Tran2019,
  author    = {Tran, Ngoc Trinh},
  title     = {Limit and Shakedown analysis of structures under stochastic conditions},
  publisher = {Technische Universit{\"a}t Braunschweig},
  address   = {Braunschweig},
  doi       = {10.24355/dbbs.084-201902121135-0},
  pages     = {166 S.},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Staat2013,
  author    = {Staat, Manfred},
  title     = {Limit and shakedown analysis under uncertainty},
  series = {International journal of computational methods : IJCM},
  journal   = {International journal of computational methods : IJCM},
  publisher = {World Scientific Publishing},
  address   = {Singapore},
  issn      = {0219-8762},
  pages     = {Publ. online},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}