@article{JacobsGebhardt1996,
  author    = {Jacobs, Stephan and Gebhardt, Michael},
  title     = {Conflict Management in Design /},
  series = {Transactions from the Eighth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment : (concurrent with International Symposium on QFD 96] ; June 9 - 11, 1996, Novi, Michigan, USA / sponsored by: QFD Institute},
  journal   = {Transactions from the Eighth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment : (concurrent with International Symposium on QFD 96] ; June 9 - 11, 1996, Novi, Michigan, USA / sponsored by: QFD Institute},
  publisher = {QFD Institute},
  address   = {Ann Arbor, Mich.},
  pages     = {599 S.},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JacobsHermanns1996,
  author    = {Jacobs, Stephan and Hermanns, Oliver},
  title     = {Cooperative Design: Requirements on Network Technology and Document Architecture},
  series = {Selected papers of the 6th Joint European Networking Conference / guest ed.: J. Barber{\´a}},
  journal   = {Selected papers of the 6th Joint European Networking Conference / guest ed.: J. Barber{\´a}},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
  pages     = {S. 428 - 600 : Ill., graph. Darst.},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Jacobs1993,
  author    = {Jacobs, Stephan},
  title     = {CSCW for Requirements Engineering - Requirements Engineering for CSCW},
  series = {Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work : 13 - 17 September 1993, Milan, Italy ; ECSCW ' 93 / ed. by Giorgio de Michelis ...},
  journal   = {Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work : 13 - 17 September 1993, Milan, Italy ; ECSCW ' 93 / ed. by Giorgio de Michelis ...},
  publisher = {Kluwer},
  address   = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
  isbn      = {0-7923-2447-1},
  pages     = {XI, 364 S. : Ill., graph. Darst.},
  year      = {1993},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Pietsch2005,
  author    = {Pietsch, Wolfram},
  title     = {Customer-Oriented Specification and Evaluation of IT Service Level Agreements},
  series = {Software process improvement : Elektronische Ressource : 12th European conference ; proceedings / EuroSPI 2005, Budapest, Hungary, November 9 - 11, 2005. Ita Richardson ... (ed.)},
  journal   = {Software process improvement : Elektronische Ressource : 12th European conference ; proceedings / EuroSPI 2005, Budapest, Hungary, November 9 - 11, 2005. Ita Richardson ... (ed.)},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin [u.a.]},
  isbn      = {3-540-30286-7},
  pages     = {83 -- 94},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Weigand2009,
  author    = {Weigand, Christoph},
  title     = {Defining Precisions for Reliable Measurement and Estimation Procedures},
  series = {Economic Quality Control. 24 (2009), H. 1},
  journal   = {Economic Quality Control. 24 (2009), H. 1},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {0940-5151},
  pages     = {5 -- 33},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{Gell2012,
  author    = {Gell, Sebastian},
  title     = {Determinants of earnings forecast error, earnings forecast revision and earnings forecast accuracy},
  publisher = {Springer Gabler},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8349-3936-4},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-8349-3937-1},
  pages     = {XXIV, 125 Seiten},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {​Earnings forecasts are ubiquitous in today's financial markets. They are essential indicators of future firm performance and a starting point for firm valuation. Extremely inaccurate and overoptimistic forecasts during the most recent financial crisis have raised serious doubts regarding the reliability of such forecasts. This thesis therefore investigates new determinants of forecast errors and accuracy. In addition, new determinants of forecast revisions are examined. More specifically, the thesis answers the following questions: 1) How do analyst incentives lead to forecast errors? 2) How do changes in analyst incentives lead to forecast revisions?, and 3) What factors drive differences in forecast accuracy?},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Grap2003,
  author    = {Grap, Rolf Dietmar},
  title     = {Determining manpower requirements in a spinning mill},
  series = {Chemical fibers international : CFI ; fiber polymers, fibers, texturing, and spunbonds (2003)},
  journal   = {Chemical fibers international : CFI ; fiber polymers, fibers, texturing, and spunbonds (2003)},
  isbn      = {0340-3343},
  pages     = {455 -- 458},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Mischke1995,
  author    = {Mischke, Winfried},
  title     = {Die Garantie im Kaufrecht},
  series = {Betriebs-Berater. 50 (1995), H. 22},
  journal   = {Betriebs-Berater. 50 (1995), H. 22},
  isbn      = {0340-7918},
  pages     = {1093 -- 1096},
  year      = {1995},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Bernecker2014,
  author    = {Bernecker, Andreas},
  title     = {Divided Government and the Adoption of Economic Reforms},
  series = {CESifo DICE Report - Journal for Institutional Comparison},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {CESifo DICE Report - Journal for Institutional Comparison},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Ifo Institute for Economic Research},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  issn      = {1612-0663},
  pages     = {47 -- 52},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Bernecker2016,
  author    = {Bernecker, Andreas},
  title     = {Divided we reform? Evidence from US welfare policies},
  series = {Journal of Public Economics},
  volume    = {142},
  journal   = {Journal of Public Economics},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0047-2727},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.003},
  pages     = {24 -- 38},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Divided government is often thought of as causing legislative deadlock. I investigate the link between divided government and economic reforms using a novel data set on welfare reforms in US states between 1978 and 2010. Panel data regressions show that, under divided government, a US state is around 25\% more likely to adopt a welfare reform than under unified government. Several robustness checks confirm this counter-intuitive finding. Case study evidence suggests an explanation based on policy competition between governor, senate, and house.},
  language  = {en}
}