@article{InfantinoPaulssenMostaccietal.2016,
  author    = {Infantino, Angelo and Paulßen, Elisabeth and Mostacci, Domiziano and Schaffer, Paul and Trinczek, Michael and Hoehr, Cornelia},
  title     = {Assessment of the production of medical isotopes using the Monte Carlo code FLUKA: Simulations against experimental measurements},
  series = {Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms},
  volume    = {366},
  journal   = {Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1872-9584},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.nimb.2015.10.067},
  pages     = {117 -- 123},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The Monte Carlo code FLUKA is used to simulate the production of a number of positron emitting radionuclides, ¹⁸F, ¹³N, ⁹⁴Tc, ⁴⁴Sc, ⁶⁸Ga, ⁸⁶Y, ⁸⁹Zr, ⁵²Mn, ⁶¹Cu and ⁵⁵Co, on a small medical cyclotron with a proton beam energy of 13 MeV. Experimental data collected at the TR13 cyclotron at TRIUMF agree within a factor of 0.6 ± 0.4 with the directly simulated data, except for the production of ⁵⁵Co, where the simulation underestimates the experiment by a factor of 3.4 ± 0.4. The experimental data also agree within a factor of 0.8 ± 0.6 with the convolution of simulated proton fluence and cross sections from literature. Overall, this confirms the applicability of FLUKA to simulate radionuclide production at 13 MeV proton beam energy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LiuSchaapBallemansetal.2017,
  author    = {Liu, Z. and Schaap, K. S. and Ballemans, L. and de Blois, E. and Rohde, M. and Paulßen, Elisabeth},
  title     = {Measurement of reaction kinetics of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE using a microfluidic system},
  series = {Dalton Transactions},
  volume    = {46},
  journal   = {Dalton Transactions},
  number    = {42},
  issn      = {1477-9234},
  doi       = {10.1039/C7DT01830D},
  pages     = {14669 -- 14676},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Wilke2016,
  author    = {Wilke, Thomas},
  title     = {Planning Process of the Di Castellamonte's Chapel of the Holy Shroud},
  series = {Carlo e Amedeo di Castellamonte : 1571-1683, ingegneri e architetti per i duchi di Savoia},
  booktitle = {Carlo e Amedeo di Castellamonte : 1571-1683, ingegneri e architetti per i duchi di Savoia},
  editor    = {Merlotti, Andrea},
  publisher = {Campisano editore},
  address   = {Rom},
  isbn      = {978-88-98229-57-4},
  pages     = {141 -- 152},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{SchuhGottschalkHoehneetal.2008,
  author    = {Schuh, G{\"u}nther and Gottschalk, Sebastian and H{\"o}hne, Tim and Attig, Philipp},
  title     = {Further Potentials of Smart Logistics},
  series = {Manufacturing Systems and Technologies for the New Frontier},
  booktitle = {Manufacturing Systems and Technologies for the New Frontier},
  editor    = {Mitsuishi, M.},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {978-1-84800-267-8},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-1-84800-267-8_18},
  pages     = {93 -- 96},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{SchuhGottschalkNarretal.2007,
  author    = {Schuh, G{\"u}nther and Gottschalk, Sebastian Friedrich and Narr, Claus and H{\"o}hne, Tim},
  title     = {Adaptive logistics : information management for planning and control of small series assembly},
  series = {2nd International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV 2007), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 22-24 July 2007 : Book of Abstracts},
  booktitle = {2nd International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV 2007), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 22-24 July 2007 : Book of Abstracts},
  editor    = {Z{\"a}h, Michael F.},
  isbn      = {978-0-9783187-0-3},
  pages     = {212 -- 221},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchuhGottschalkHoehne2007,
  author    = {Schuh, G. and Gottschalk, S. and H{\"o}hne, Tim},
  title     = {High Resolution Production Management},
  series = {CIRP Annals},
  volume    = {56},
  journal   = {CIRP Annals},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {0007-8506},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.105},
  pages     = {439 -- 442},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FunkeKeinzHendrick2017,
  author    = {Funke, Harald and Keinz, Jan and Hendrick, P.},
  title     = {Experimental Evaluation of the Pollutant and Noise Emissions of the GTCP 36-300 Gas Turbine Operated with Kerosene and a Low NOX Micromix Hydrogen Combustor},
  series = {7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences, EUCASS 2017},
  booktitle = {7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences, EUCASS 2017},
  organization    = {7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences, EUCASS 2017-125, Milan, Italy, July 2017},
  doi       = {10.13009/EUCASS2017-125},
  pages     = {10 Seiten},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LauraDrechslerErdtetal.2018,
  author    = {Laura, C.O. and Drechsler, Klaus and Erdt, M. and Wesarg, S. and Bale, R.},
  title     = {Intervention assessment tool for primary tumors in the liver},
  series = {Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2364-5504},
  doi       = {10.1515/cdbme-2018-0081},
  pages     = {337 -- 340},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {After a liver tumor intervention the medical doctor has to compare both pre and postoperative CT acquisitions to ensure that all carcinogenic cells are destroyed. A correct assessment of the intervention is of vital importance, since it will reduce the probability of tumor recurrence. Some methods have been proposed to support the medical doctors during the assessment process, however, all of them focus on secondary tumors. In this paper a tool is presented that enables the outcome validation for both primary and secondary tumors. Therefore, a multiphase registration (preoperative arterial and portal phases) followed by a registration between the pre and postoperative CT images is carried out. The first registration is in charge of the primary tumors that are only visible in the arterial phase. The secondary tumors will be incorporated in the second registration step. Finally, the part of the tumor that was not covered by the necrosis is quantified and visualized. The method has been tested in 9 patients, with an average registration error of 1.41 mm.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ValeroVitiGualtieri2019,
  author    = {Valero, Daniel and Viti, Nicolo and Gualtieri, Carlo},
  title     = {Numerical Simulation of Hydraulic Jumps. Part 1: Experimental Data for Modelling Performance Assessment},
  series = {Water},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Water},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2073-4441},
  doi       = {10.3390/w11010036},
  pages     = {Art. Nr. 36},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VitiValeroGualtieri2019,
  author    = {Viti, Nicolo and Valero, Daniel and Gualtieri, Carlo},
  title     = {Numerical Simulation of Hydraulic Jumps. Part 2: Recent Results and Future Outlook},
  series = {Water},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Water},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {2073-4441},
  doi       = {10.3390/w11010028},
  pages     = {Art. Nr. 28},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}