@inproceedings{KohlFreyerKraemeretal.2023,
  author    = {Kohl, Philipp and Freyer, Nils and Kr{\"a}mer, Yoka and Werth, Henri and Wolf, Steffen and Kraft, Bodo and Meinecke, Matthias and Z{\"u}ndorf, Albert},
  title     = {ALE: a simulation-based active learning evaluation framework for the parameter-driven comparison of query strategies for NLP},
  series = {Deep Learning Theory and Applications},
  booktitle = {Deep Learning Theory and Applications},
  editor    = {Conte, Donatello and Fred, Ana and Gusikhin, Oleg and Sansone, Carlo},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-031-39058-6 (Print)},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-031-39059-3_16},
  pages     = {235 -- 253},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Supervised machine learning and deep learning require a large amount of labeled data, which data scientists obtain in a manual, and time-consuming annotation process. To mitigate this challenge, Active Learning (AL) proposes promising data points to annotators they annotate next instead of a subsequent or random sample. This method is supposed to save annotation effort while maintaining model performance. However, practitioners face many AL strategies for different tasks and need an empirical basis to choose between them. Surveys categorize AL strategies into taxonomies without performance indications. Presentations of novel AL strategies compare the performance to a small subset of strategies. Our contribution addresses the empirical basis by introducing a reproducible active learning evaluation (ALE) framework for the comparative evaluation of AL strategies in NLP. The framework allows the implementation of AL strategies with low effort and a fair data-driven comparison through defining and tracking experiment parameters (e.g., initial dataset size, number of data points per query step, and the budget). ALE helps practitioners to make more informed decisions, and researchers can focus on developing new, effective AL strategies and deriving best practices for specific use cases. With best practices, practitioners can lower their annotation costs. We present a case study to illustrate how to use the framework.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{Knueppel2007,
  author    = {Kn{\"u}ppel, Mark},
  title     = {Bilanzierung von Verschmelzungen nach Handelsrecht, Steuerrecht und IFRS : Gemeinsamkeiten, Unterschiede und Grenzen der Konvergenz},
  publisher = {E. Schmidt},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-503-10009-5},
  pages     = {XXVIII, 322 S. : graph. Darst.},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Knueppel2005,
  author    = {Kn{\"u}ppel, Mark},
  title     = {Außerbilanzielle Korrekturen},
  series = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver},
  journal   = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver},
  publisher = {Haufe},
  address   = {Freiburg},
  pages     = {17-1 -- 17-67},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Knueppel2003,
  author    = {Kn{\"u}ppel, Mark},
  title     = {Sonderbilanz und Status},
  series = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver},
  journal   = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver},
  publisher = {Haufe},
  address   = {Freiburg},
  pages     = {122-1 -- 122-53},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Knueppel2002,
  author    = {Kn{\"u}ppel, Mark},
  title     = {Pro-Forma-Angaben},
  series = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver},
  journal   = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver},
  publisher = {Haufe},
  address   = {Freiburg},
  pages     = {1950 -- 1952},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Knueppel2012,
  author    = {Kn{\"u}ppel, Mark},
  title     = {Außerbilanzielle Korrekturen},
  series = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung online},
  journal   = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung online},
  editor    = {Federmann, Rudolf and Kußmaul, Heinz and M{\"u}ller, Stefan},
  publisher = {Haufe},
  address   = {Freiburg},
  issn      = {0172-0392},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{KnackstedtEggertHeddieretal.2013,
  author    = {Knackstedt, Ralf and Eggert, Mathias and Heddier, Marcel and Chasin, Friedrich and Becker, J{\"o}rg},
  title     = {The Relationship of IS and Law - Insights into the German Online Car Registration Case},
  series = {ECIS 2013 Completed Research. 18. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems},
  booktitle = {ECIS 2013 Completed Research. 18. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems},
  pages     = {13 S.},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{KnackstedtEggertHeddieretal.2013,
  author    = {Knackstedt, Ralf and Eggert, Mathias and Heddier, Marcel and Chasin, Friedrich and Becker, J{\"o}rg},
  title     = {The Relationship Of Is And Law - The Perspective Of And Implications For IS Research},
  series = {ECIS 2013 Completed Research. 18},
  booktitle = {ECIS 2013 Completed Research. 18},
  pages     = {13 S.},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KnackstedtEggertGraeweetal.2010,
  author    = {Knackstedt, Ralf and Eggert, Mathias and Gr{\"a}we, Lena and Spittka, Jan},
  title     = {Forschungsportal f{\"u}r Rechtsinformatik und Informationsrecht - Weg zu einer disziplinen{\"u}bergreifenden Forschungs{\"u}bersicht},
  series = {MMR - Multimedia und Recht},
  journal   = {MMR - Multimedia und Recht},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  issn      = {1434-596X},
  pages     = {528 -- 533},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Die Entwicklungen der Rechtsinformatik und des Informationsrechts zeigen, dass diese Disziplinen aktuell vor der Herausforderung stehen, eine interdisziplin{\"a}re Zusammenarbeit zwischen ihnen und anderen Disziplinen zu etablieren. Unterschiedliche Publikationskulturen erschweren die Erreichung dieses Ziels. Forschungsportale stellen themenspezifische, internetbasierte Verzeichnisse dar, die bereits vorhandene Informationen strukturiert zug{\"a}nglich machen. Sie k{\"o}nnen die Beziehungen zwischen den Disziplinen f{\"o}rdern, indem sie bereits erzielte Arbeitsergebnisse disziplinen{\"u}bergreifend bekannt machen und dadurch dazu beitragen, Synergiepotenziale und m{\"o}gliche Kooperationspartner zu identifizieren.},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{KnackstedtEggertFleischer2012,
  author    = {Knackstedt, Ralf and Eggert, Mathias and Fleischer, Stefan},
  title     = {The Legal Perspective on Business to Government Reporting - A Conceptual Modeling Approach and Its Application in the Financial Sector},
  series = {45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2012},
  booktitle = {45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2012},
  isbn      = {978-0-7695-4525-7},
  doi       = {10.1109/HICSS.2012.576},
  pages     = {2309 -- 2318},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}