@article{Finkenberger2014,
  author    = {Finkenberger, Isabel Maria},
  title     = {Vox populi. (Transformations-)potenziale nachkriegsmoderner Freiraumressourcen},
  series = {Stadt+Gr{\"u}n},
  volume    = {2014},
  journal   = {Stadt+Gr{\"u}n},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Patzer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0948-9770},
  pages     = {31 -- 35},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Heute wie damals werden die großz{\"u}gigen und offenen Siedlungsstrukturen der ersten Nachkriegsjahrzehnte mit ihrem hohen Anteil an "Gr{\"u}n" vielfach gesch{\"a}tzt und als solche nicht grundlegend hinterfragt. "Gr{\"u}n" verheißt im Allgemeinen Licht, Luft und Sonne, Freizeit und Erholung und gilt als etwas W{\"u}nschenswertes im st{\"a}dtischen Kontext. Unbeachtet bleibt, dass dem Begriff "Gr{\"u}n" zun{\"a}chst keine Eigenschaften oder Qualit{\"a}ten zugewiesen sind - er sagt noch lange nichts {\"u}ber dessen r{\"a}umliche Qualit{\"a}t, dessen Nutzbarkeit, Erreichbarkeit und Zug{\"a}nglichkeit aus. Abstandsgr{\"u}n und Straßenbegleitgr{\"u}n ist eben auch "Gr{\"u}n". Neben einer quantitativen Argumentation, welche {\"o}kologischen Aspekte wie Biotopvernetzung, Stadt- und Mikroklima ber{\"u}cksichtigt, sollten wir verst{\"a}rkt qualitativ denken und damit die Grundlage f{\"u}r einen erweiterten und wesentlich differenzierteren Diskurs {\"u}ber urbane Freir{\"a}ume ebnen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Finkenberger2019,
  author    = {Finkenberger, Isabel Maria},
  title     = {Bodenpolitik als Instrument strategischer Transformation},
  series = {UrbanLab-Magazin : Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r Stadt- und Quartierplanung},
  volume    = {2019},
  journal   = {UrbanLab-Magazin : Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r Stadt- und Quartierplanung},
  number    = {05},
  pages     = {18 -- 25},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{FinkenbergerVeil2020,
  author    = {Finkenberger, Isabel Maria and Veil, Katja},
  title     = {R{\"a}umliche Transformation},
  series = {RaumPlanung : Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r r{\"a}umliche Planung und Forschung},
  volume    = {205},
  journal   = {RaumPlanung : Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r r{\"a}umliche Planung und Forschung},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {IfR (Informationskreis f{\"u}r Raumplanung)},
  address   = {Dortmund},
  issn      = {0176-7534},
  pages     = {6 -- 11},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{EbertSchneiderStapenhorst2022,
  author    = {Ebert, Carola and Schneider, Tatjana and Stapenhorst, Carolin},
  title     = {Undergraduate Research in Architecture},
  series = {The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research},
  booktitle = {The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research},
  editor    = {Mieg, Harald A. and Ambos, Elizabeth and Brew, Angela and Galli, Dominique and Lehmann, Judith},
  publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  isbn      = {9781108869508},
  doi       = {10.1017/9781108869508.049},
  pages     = {355 -- 362},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Architecture is a university subject with educational roots in both the technical university and art/specialized architecture schools, yet it lacks a strong research orientation and is focused on professional expertise. This chapter explores the particular role of research within architectural education in general by discussing two different cases for the implementation of undergraduate research in architecture: during the late 1990s and early 2000s at the University of Sheffield, UK, and during the 2010s at RWTH Aachen University, Germany. These examples illustrate the asynchronous beginnings of similar developments, and also contextualize differences in disciplinary habitus and pedagogical approaches between Sheffield, where research impulses stemmed from within the Architectural Humanities, and Aachen with its strong tradition as a technical university.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Stapenhorst2023,
  author    = {Stapenhorst, Carolin},
  title     = {The didactic experimentation on housing modules for cycle travellers},
  series = {MAACC. Modulo abitativo autosufficiente per cicloviaggiatori e camminatori.},
  booktitle = {MAACC. Modulo abitativo autosufficiente per cicloviaggiatori e camminatori.},
  editor    = {Callegari, Guido and De Giorgi, Claudia and Occelli, Chiara L.M. and Palma, Riccardo},
  publisher = {LetteraVentidue Edizioni Srl},
  address   = {Siracusa},
  isbn      = {978-88-6242-778-4},
  pages     = {40 -- 44},
  year      = {2023},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StapenhorstDutto2020,
  author    = {Stapenhorst, Carolin and Dutto, Andrea Alberto},
  title     = {Turin: Industriedenkmal wird Kulturzentrum wird Lazarett},
  series = {Bauwelt},
  volume    = {111},
  journal   = {Bauwelt},
  number    = {13},
  publisher = {Bauverlag BV},
  address   = {G{\"u}tersloh},
  issn      = {0005-6855},
  pages     = {56 -- 59},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{StapenhorstGessnerWoerd2017,
  author    = {Stapenhorst, Carolin and Geßner, Stephan and Woerd, Jan Dirk van der},
  title     = {ArchitecTours - a close look on structures around us},
  series = {Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia},
  editor    = {B{\"o}gle, Annette and Grohmann, Manfred},
  publisher = {IASS},
  address   = {Madrid},
  issn      = {2518-6582},
  pages     = {9 Seiten},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Architects and civil engineers work together regularly during their professional days and are irreplaceable for each other. This co-operation is sometimes made more difficult by the differences in their disciplinary languages and approaches. Structures are evaluated by architects on the basis of criteria such as spatial impact and usability, while civil engineers analyze them more closely by their bearing and deformation properties, as well as by constructive aspects. This diversity of assessment criteria and approaches is often continued in both academic disciplines in the view on structures. Within the framework of the Exploratory Teaching Space (ETS), a funding program to improve teaching at RWTH Aachen University and to promote new teaching concepts, a project was carried out jointly by the Junior Professorship of Tool-Culture at the Faculty of Architecture and the Institute of Structural Concrete at the Faculty of Civil Engineering. The aim of the project is to present buildings in such a way that the differences in perception between architects and civil engineers are reduced and the common understanding is promoted. The project develops a database, which contains a collection of striking buildings from Aachen and the surrounding area. The buildings are categorized according to terms that come from both disciplinary areas. The collection can be freely explored or crossed through learning trails. The medium of film plays a special role in presenting the buildings. The buildings are assigned to different categories of load bearing structures as linear, planar and spatial structures, and further to different types of material, functional programs and spatial characteristics. Since the buildings are located in the direct vicinity of Aachen, they can be visited by the students. This makes them more sensitive to their environment. Intrinsic motivation, as well as implicit learning is encouraged. The paper will provide a detailed report of the project, its implementation, the feedback of the students and the plans for further development.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{Stapenhorst2016,
  author    = {Stapenhorst, Carolin},
  title     = {Concept : a dialogic instrument in architectural design},
  publisher = {Jovis},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-86859-364-8},
  pages     = {207 Seiten},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Concept - this is a key term in architectural discourse. However, all too often it is used imprecisely or merely for marketing purposes. What is a concept actually? This publication moves between design theory and design practice and follows the history of the definition of concept in architecture, leading to the formulation of a specifically instrumental and operative definition. It bases concept in architecture on its strategic potential in design decision-making processes. In the changing profession of the designing architect, decisions are increasingly made in multidisciplinary groups. Concept can serve as a dialogic instrument in the process, making it possible to process heterogeneous information from a range of spheres of knowledge. The effective presentation of selected information becomes a relevant interface in the design process, which has a significant influence on the quality of the design.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Stapenhorst2016,
  author    = {Stapenhorst, Carolin},
  title     = {Grids. Projektdokumentationen als Denkinstrument},
  series = {Manifestationen im Entwurf},
  booktitle = {Manifestationen im Entwurf},
  editor    = {Schmitz, Thomas H. and H{\"a}ußling, Roger and Mareis, Claudia and Groninger, Hannah},
  publisher = {Transcript},
  address   = {Bielefeld},
  isbn      = {978-3-8394-3160-3},
  doi       = {10.1515/9783839431603-009},
  pages     = {185 -- 216},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Stapenhorst2017,
  author    = {Stapenhorst, Carolin},
  title     = {Robustheit},
  series = {Hiatus. Architekturen f{\"u}r die gebrauchte Stadt},
  booktitle = {Hiatus. Architekturen f{\"u}r die gebrauchte Stadt},
  editor    = {Frank, Ute and Lindenmayer, Verena and Loewenberg, Patrick and Rocneanu, Carla},
  publisher = {Birkh{\"a}user},
  address   = {Basel},
  isbn      = {978-3-0356-1386-5},
  pages     = {155 -- 164},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {de}
}