@article{TranPhamVuetal.2009, author = {Tran, Thanh Ngoc and Pham, Phu Tinh and Vu, D. K. and Staat, Manfred}, title = {Reliability Analysis of Inelastic Shell Structures Under Variable Loads}, series = {Limit States of Materials and Structures : Direct Methods / Hrsg. Dieter Weichert; Hrsg. Alan Ponter}, journal = {Limit States of Materials and Structures : Direct Methods / Hrsg. Dieter Weichert; Hrsg. Alan Ponter}, publisher = {Springer Netherland}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-1-4020-9633-4}, pages = {135 -- 156}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{Laack2013, author = {Laack, Walter van}, title = {The genetic code should be seen as a positioning code}, series = {British journal of arts and social sciences. Vol. 14 (2013), No. 1}, journal = {British journal of arts and social sciences. Vol. 14 (2013), No. 1}, issn = {2046-9578}, pages = {93 -- 97}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{StaatHeitzer2002, author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, Michael}, title = {The restricted influence of kinematic hardening on shakedown loads}, year = {2002}, abstract = {Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratcheting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range. In cyclic plasticity more sophisticated hardening models have been suggested in order to model the strain evolution observed in ratcheting experiments. The hardening models used in shakedown analysis are comparatively simple. It is shown that shakedown analysis can make quite stable predictions of admissible load ranges despite the simplicity of the underlying hardening models. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis. Both give identical or similar shakedown ranges. Structural shakedown analyses show that the loading may have a more pronounced effect than the hardening model.}, subject = {Biomedizinische Technik}, language = {en} } @incollection{OsterhageBialonskiStanieketal.2008, author = {Osterhage, Hannes and Bialonski, Stephan and Staniek, Matth{\"a}us and Schindler, Kaspar and Wagner, Tobias and Elger, Christian E. and Lehnertz, Klaus}, title = {Bivariate and multivariate time series analysis techniques and their potential impact for seizure prediction}, series = {Seizure Prediction in Epilepsy: From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Applications}, booktitle = {Seizure Prediction in Epilepsy: From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Applications}, publisher = {Wiley-VCH}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-527-62519-2}, doi = {10.1002/9783527625192.ch15}, pages = {189 -- 208}, year = {2008}, language = {en} } @misc{Staat2006, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Technische Mechanik. Vorlesungsmitschrift. Korrigierter Nachdr. der 3. Aufl.}, year = {2006}, abstract = {{\"U}berarbeitete, korrigierte und erg{\"a}nzte Version einer Vorlesungsmitschrift von Sebastian Kr{\"a}mer. 172 S. Inhaltsverzeichnis 0 Einf{\"u}hrung in die Mechanik 1 Statik starrer K{\"o}rper 2 Elastostatik (Festigkeitslehre) 3 Kinematik 4 Kinetik Literatur}, subject = {Technische Mechanik}, language = {de} } @misc{Staat2006, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Engineering Mechanics. Lecture Notes. 2nd edition, translation of the 3rd corrected and extended German edition of "Technische Mechanik"}, year = {2006}, abstract = {English translation of the corrected lectures notes of Sebastian Kr{\"a}mer. Contents 0 Introduction to Mechanics 1 Statics of Rigid Bodies 2 Elastostatics (Strength of Materials) 3 Kinematics 4 Kinetics Literature}, subject = {Technische Mechanik}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{Staat2006, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Problems and chances for probabilistic fracture mechanics in the analysis of steel pressure boundary reliability. - {\"U}berarb. Ausg.}, year = {2006}, abstract = {In: Technical feasibility and reliability of passive safety systems for nuclear power plants. Proceedings of an Advisory Group Meeting held in J{\"u}lich, 21-24 November 1994. - Vienna , 1996. - Seite: 43 - 55 IAEA-TECDOC-920 Abstract: It is shown that the difficulty for probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) is the general problem of the high reliability of a small population. There is no way around the problem as yet. Therefore what PFM can contribute to the reliability of steel pressure boundaries is demon­strated with the example of a typical reactor pressure vessel and critically discussed. Although no method is distinguishable that could give exact failure probabilities, PFM has several addi­tional chances. Upper limits for failure probability may be obtained together with trends for design and operating conditions. Further, PFM can identify the most sensitive parameters, improved control of which would increase reliability. Thus PFM should play a vital role in the analysis of steel pressure boundaries despite all shortcomings.}, subject = {Bruchmechanik}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{TranStaatKreissig2007, author = {Tran, Thanh Ngoc and Staat, Manfred and Kreißig, R.}, title = {Calculation of load carrying capacity of shell structures with elasto-plastic material by direct methods}, year = {2007}, abstract = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Material Theory and Nonlinear Dynamics. MatDyn. Hanoi, Vietnam, Sept. 24-26, 2007, 8 p. In this paper, a method is introduced to determine the limit load of general shells using the finite element method. The method is based on an upper bound limit and shakedown analysis with elastic-perfectly plastic material model. A non-linear constrained optimisation problem is solved by using Newton's method in conjunction with a penalty method and the Lagrangean dual method. Numerical investigation of a pipe bend subjected to bending moments proves the effectiveness of the algorithm.}, subject = {Finite-Elemente-Methode}, language = {en} } @article{StaatHeitzer1999, author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M.}, title = {Structural Reliability Analysis of Elasto-Plastic Structures}, series = {Safety and reliability : proceedings of ESREL '99, the Tenth European Conference on Safety and Reliability, Munich-Garching, Germany, 13 - 17 September 1999 / Schu{\"e}ller, G. I.; Kafka, P. [eds]}, journal = {Safety and reliability : proceedings of ESREL '99, the Tenth European Conference on Safety and Reliability, Munich-Garching, Germany, 13 - 17 September 1999 / Schu{\"e}ller, G. I.; Kafka, P. [eds]}, publisher = {Balkema}, address = {Rotterdam}, isbn = {90-5809-109-0}, pages = {513 -- 518}, year = {1999}, language = {en} } @article{LeversStaatLaack2011, author = {Levers, A. and Staat, Manfred and Laack, Walter van}, title = {Analyse der Langzeitwirkung der MBST® KernspinResonanzTherapie bei Gonarthrose}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Originalausgabe: Orthop{\"a}dische Praxis Jg. 47. 2011 H. 11; S. 536-543. Mit freundlicher Genehmigung des Verlags Zusammenfassung: Auf der Basis von Patientenabfragen mittels Fragebogen zum Schmerzempfinden und zur Einschr{\"a}nkung bei Aktivit{\"a}ten des allt{\"a}glichen Lebens wird die Langzeitwirkung der MBST® KernspinResonanz-Therapie bei Gonarthrose untersucht. An der Studie nahmen 39 Patienten teil, bei denen die Therapie bis zu vier Jahre zur{\"u}ckliegt. Neben einer Gesamtbetrachtung wird der Erfolg auch in Abh{\"a}ngigkeit von Alter, Geschlecht und sportlicher Aktivit{\"a}t analysiert. Insgesamt weist die Studie auf eine anhaltende Verbesserung des Gesundheitszustands mit zum Teil deutlicher Schmerzlinderung auch noch nach vier Jahren hin, jedoch mit einer leichten Schmerzzunahme gegen Ende des Untersuchungszeitraums von vier Jahren. Eine tendenziell positivere Wirkung bei Frauen, {\"a}lteren Menschen oder auch sportlich nicht-aktiven Patienten l{\"a}sst auf eine m{\"o}gliche Beeinflussung des Erfolgs der Therapie durch ({\"U}ber-)Belastung im Alltag schließen. Ein zus{\"a}tzlich positiver Effekt der Therapie auf die Knochendichte ist ebenfalls denkbar, dies bleibt jedoch offen.}, subject = {Kniegelenkarthrose}, language = {de} }