@incollection{Pietsch2013,
  author    = {Pietsch, Wolfram},
  title     = {A framework for strategic positioning of IT-products},
  series = {Software business : from physical products to software services and solutions : 4th International Conference on Software Business, ICSOB 2013; Potsdam; Germany; 11 June 2013 through 14 June 2013. (Lecture notes in business information processing ; 150)},
  booktitle = {Software business : from physical products to software services and solutions : 4th International Conference on Software Business, ICSOB 2013; Potsdam; Germany; 11 June 2013 through 14 June 2013. (Lecture notes in business information processing ; 150)},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-642-39336-5_11},
  pages     = {102 -- 116},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {IT Products are viewed and managed differently depending on the perspectives and the stage within the life cycle. A model is presented that integrates different perspectives and stages serving as an aid for the analysis of business models and focused positioning of IT-products. Four generic business models are analysed with regard to the product management function in general and the positioning field for IT-products specifically: off-the-shelf (license), license plus service, project, and system service (incl. cloud computing).},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{FreyerKempt2023,
  author    = {Freyer, Nils and Kempt, Hendrik},
  title     = {AI-DSS in healthcare and their power over health-insecure collectives},
  series = {Justice in global health},
  booktitle = {Justice in global health},
  editor    = {Bhakuni, Himani and Miotto, Lucas},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {9781003399933},
  doi       = {10.4324/9781003399933-4},
  pages     = {38 -- 55},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {AI-based systems are nearing ubiquity not only in everyday low-stakes activities but also in medical procedures. To protect patients and physicians alike, explainability requirements have been proposed for the operation of AI-based decision support systems (AI-DSS), which adds hurdles to the productive use of AI in clinical contexts. This raises two questions: Who decides these requirements? And how should access to AI-DSS be provided to communities that reject these standards (particularly when such communities are expert-scarce)? This chapter investigates a dilemma that emerges from the implementation of global AI governance. While rejecting global AI governance limits the ability to help communities in need, global AI governance risks undermining and subjecting health-insecure communities to the force of the neo-colonial world order. For this, this chapter first surveys the current landscape of AI governance and introduces the approach of relational egalitarianism as key to (global health) justice. To discuss the two horns of the referred dilemma, the core power imbalances faced by health-insecure collectives (HICs) are examined. The chapter argues that only strong demands of a dual strategy towards health-secure collectives can both remedy the immediate needs of HICs and enable them to become healthcare independent.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{KraftKohlMeinecke2024,
  author    = {Kraft, Bodo and Kohl, Philipp and Meinecke, Matthias},
  title     = {Analyse und Nachverfolgung von Projektzielen durch Einsatz von Natural Language Processing},
  series = {KI in der Projektwirtschaft : was ver{\"a}ndert sich durch KI im Projektmanagement?},
  booktitle = {KI in der Projektwirtschaft : was ver{\"a}ndert sich durch KI im Projektmanagement?},
  editor    = {Bernert, Christian and Scheurer, Steffen and Wehnes, Harald},
  publisher = {UVK Verlag},
  isbn      = {978-3-3811-1132-9 (Online)},
  doi       = {10.24053/9783381111329},
  pages     = {157 -- 167},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{EggertZaehlWolfetal.2023,
  author    = {Eggert, Mathias and Z{\"a}hl, Philipp M. and Wolf, Martin R. and Haase, Martin},
  title     = {Applying leaderboards for quality improvement in software development projects},
  series = {Software Engineering for Games in Serious Contexts},
  booktitle = {Software Engineering for Games in Serious Contexts},
  editor    = {Cooper, Kendra M.L. and Bucchiarone, Antonio},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-031-33337-8 (Print)},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-031-33338-5_11},
  pages     = {243 -- 263},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Software development projects often fail because of insufficient code quality. It is now well documented that the task of testing software, for example, is perceived as uninteresting and rather boring, leading to poor software quality and major challenges to software development companies. One promising approach to increase the motivation for considering software quality is the use of gamification. Initial research works already investigated the effects of gamification on software developers and come to promising. Nevertheless, a lack of results from field experiments exists, which motivates the chapter at hand. By conducting a gamification experiment with five student software projects and by interviewing the project members, the chapter provides insights into the changing programming behavior of information systems students when confronted with a leaderboard. The results reveal a motivational effect as well as a reduction of code smells.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{KrollLudwigs2017,
  author    = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin},
  title     = {Art. 48 EGBGB: Wahl eines in einem anderen Mitgliedstaat der Europ{\"a}ischen Union erworbenen Namens, Rn. 5-8, Rn. 11-14, Rn. 45-47, Rn. 48-51},
  series = {Beck'scher Online-Großkommentar zum B{\"u}rgerlichen Recht (BeckOGK), Band: Internationales Privatrecht},
  booktitle = {Beck'scher Online-Großkommentar zum B{\"u}rgerlichen Recht (BeckOGK), Band: Internationales Privatrecht},
  editor    = {Weller, Marc-Philippe and Kindler, Peter},
  publisher = {C.H.Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{KrollLudwigs2015,
  author    = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin},
  title     = {Art. 5 Rom III-Regulation (choice of applicable law by the parties)},
  series = {Rome Regulations : commentary},
  booktitle = {Rome Regulations : commentary},
  editor    = {Calliess, Gralf-Peter},
  edition   = {2nd ed.},
  publisher = {Wolters Kluwer},
  isbn      = {9789041147547},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{KrollLudwigs2015,
  author    = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin},
  title     = {Art. 7 Rome III-Regulation (formal validity)},
  series = {Rome Regulations : commentary},
  booktitle = {Rome Regulations : commentary},
  editor    = {Colliess, Gralf-Peter},
  edition   = {2nd ed.},
  publisher = {Wolters Kluwer},
  isbn      = {9789041147547},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{EggertMoulen2023,
  author    = {Eggert, Mathias and Moulen, Tobias},
  title     = {Auswahl von Gesch{\"a}ftsprozessen zur Anwendung von Robotic Process Automation - Vergleich relevanter Kriterien aus Theorie und Praxis},
  series = {Robotik in der Wirtschaftsinformatik},
  booktitle = {Robotik in der Wirtschaftsinformatik},
  editor    = {D'Onofrio, Sara and Meinhardt, Stefan},
  publisher = {Springer Vieweg},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-39620-6 (Print)},
  pages     = {107 -- 129},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Die Auswahl der passenden Gesch{\"a}ftsprozesse f{\"u}r eine Automatisierung mittels Robotic Process Automation (RPA) ist f{\"u}r den Erfolg von RPA-Projekten entscheidend. Das vorliegende Kapitel liefert daf{\"u}r Selektionskriterien, die aus einer qualitativen Studie mit elf interviewten RPA-Experten aus dem Versicherungsumfeld resultieren. Das Ergebnis umfasst eine gewichtete Liste von sieben Dimensionen und 51 Prozesskriterien, welche die Automatisierung mit Softwarerobotern beg{\"u}nstigen beziehungsweise deren Nichterf{\"u}llung eine Umsetzung erschweren oder sogar verhindern. Die drei wichtigsten Kriterien zur Auswahl von Gesch{\"a}ftsprozessen f{\"u}r die Automatisierung mittels RPA umfassen die Entlastung der an dem Prozess mitwirkenden Mitarbeiter (Arbeitnehmerentlastung), die Ausf{\"u}hrbarkeit des Prozesses mittels Regeln (Regelbasierte Prozessteuerung) sowie ein positiver Kosten-Nutzen-Vergleich. Auf diesen Ergebnissen aufbauend wird ein Vergleich mit den bereits bekannten Selektionskriterien aus der Literatur erstellt und diskutiert. Praktiker k{\"o}nnen die Ergebnisse verwenden, um eine systematische Auswahl von RPA-relevanten Prozessen vorzunehmen. Aus wissenschaftlicher Perspektive stellen die Ergebnisse eine Grundlage zur Erkl{\"a}rung des Erfolgs und Misserfolgs von RPA-Projekten dar.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Timme2014,
  author    = {Timme, Michael},
  title     = {Begriffsbestimmungen},
  series = {Wohnungseigentumsgesetz : Gesetz {\"u}ber das Wohnungseigentum und das Dauerwohnrecht ; Kommentar},
  booktitle = {Wohnungseigentumsgesetz : Gesetz {\"u}ber das Wohnungseigentum und das Dauerwohnrecht ; Kommentar},
  edition   = {2. Auflage},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-66025-2},
  pages     = {1 -- 23},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Eggert2019,
  author    = {Eggert, Mathias},
  title     = {Big Data Research - How to Structure the Changes of the Past Decade?},
  series = {The Art of Structuring},
  booktitle = {The Art of Structuring},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-030-06234-7},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_26},
  pages     = {271 -- 281},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {In the past decade, many IS researchers focused on researching the phenomenon of Big Data. At the same time, the relevance of data protection gets more attention than ever before. In particular, since the enactment of the European General Data Protection Regulation in May 2018 Information Systems research should provide answers for protecting personal data. The article at hand presents a structuring framework for Big Data research outcome and the consideration of data protection. IS Researchers might use the framework in order to structure Big Data literature and to identify research gaps that should be addressed in the future.},
  language  = {en}
}