@article{KuhnhenneRegerPyschnyetal.2020,
  author    = {Kuhnhenne, Markus and Reger, Vitali and Pyschny, Dominik and D{\"o}ring, Bernd},
  title     = {Influence of airtightness of steel sandwich panel joints on heat losses},
  series = {E3S Web of Conferences 12th Nordic Symposium on Building Physics (NSB 2020)},
  volume    = {172},
  journal   = {E3S Web of Conferences 12th Nordic Symposium on Building Physics (NSB 2020)},
  number    = {Art. 05008},
  publisher = {EDP Sciences},
  address   = {Les Ulis},
  doi       = {10.1051/e3sconf/202017205008},
  pages     = {6},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Energy saving ordinances requires that buildings must be designed in such a way that the heat transfer surface including the joints is permanently air impermeable. The prefabricated roof and wall panels in lightweight steel constructions are airtight in the area of the steel covering layers. The sealing of the panel joints contributes to fulfil the comprehensive requirements for an airtight building envelope. To improve the airtightness of steel sandwich panels, additional sealing tapes can be installed in the panel joint. The influence of these sealing tapes was evaluated by measurements carried out by the RWTH Aachen University - Sustainable Metal Building Envelopes. Different installation situations were evaluated by carrying out airtightness tests for different joint distances. In addition, the influence on the heat transfer coefficient was also evaluated using the Finite Element Method (FEM). The combination of obtained air volume flow and transmission losses enables to create an "effective heat transfer coefficient" due to transmission and infiltration. This summarizes both effects in one value and is particularly helpful for approximate calculations on energy efficiency.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DoeringRegerKuhnhenneetal.2015,
  author    = {D{\"o}ring, Bernd and Reger, Vitali and Kuhnhenne, Markus and Feldmann, Markus and Kesti, Jyrki and Lawson, Mark and Botti, Andrea},
  title     = {Steel solutions for enabling zero-energy buildings},
  series = {Steel Construction - Design and Research},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Steel Construction - Design and Research},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Ernst \& Sohn},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1867-0539},
  doi       = {10.1002/stco.201510029},
  pages     = {194 -- 200},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BlankeHagenkampDoeringetal.2021,
  author    = {Blanke, Tobias and Hagenkamp, Markus and D{\"o}ring, Bernd and G{\"o}ttsche, Joachim and Reger, Vitali and Kuhnhenne, Markus},
  title     = {Net-exergetic, hydraulic and thermal optimization of coaxial heat exchangers using fixed flow conditions instead of fixed flow rates},
  series = {Geothermal Energy},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Geothermal Energy},
  number    = {Article number: 19},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2195-9706},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40517-021-00201-3},
  pages     = {23 Seiten},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Previous studies optimized the dimensions of coaxial heat exchangers using constant mass fow rates as a boundary condition. They show a thermal optimal circular ring width of nearly zero. Hydraulically optimal is an inner to outer pipe radius ratio of 0.65 for turbulent and 0.68 for laminar fow types. In contrast, in this study, fow conditions in the circular ring are kept constant (a set of fxed Reynolds numbers) during optimization. This approach ensures fxed fow conditions and prevents inappropriately high or low mass fow rates. The optimization is carried out for three objectives: Maximum energy gain, minimum hydraulic efort and eventually optimum net-exergy balance. The optimization changes the inner pipe radius and mass fow rate but not the Reynolds number of the circular ring. The thermal calculations base on Hellstr{\"o}m's borehole resistance and the hydraulic optimization on individually calculated linear loss of head coefcients. Increasing the inner pipe radius results in decreased hydraulic losses in the inner pipe but increased losses in the circular ring. The net-exergy diference is a key performance indicator and combines thermal and hydraulic calculations. It is the difference between thermal exergy fux and hydraulic efort. The Reynolds number in the circular ring is instead of the mass fow rate constant during all optimizations. The result from a thermal perspective is an optimal width of the circular ring of nearly zero. The hydraulically optimal inner pipe radius is 54\% of the outer pipe radius for laminar fow and 60\% for turbulent fow scenarios. Net-exergetic optimization shows a predominant infuence of hydraulic losses, especially for small temperature gains. The exact result depends on the earth's thermal properties and the fow type. Conclusively, coaxial geothermal probes' design should focus on the hydraulic optimum and take the thermal optimum as a secondary criterion due to the dominating hydraulics.},
  language  = {en}
}