@inproceedings{SchneckenburgerFranzenGligorevicetal.2011,
  author    = {Schneckenburger, N. and Franzen, N. and Gligorevic, Snjezana and Schnell, M.},
  title     = {L-band compatibility of LDACS1},
  series = {IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) : 16 - 20 Oct. 2011, Seattle, Wash.},
  booktitle = {IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) : 16 - 20 Oct. 2011, Seattle, Wash.},
  organization    = {Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers},
  isbn      = {978-1-61284-797-9},
  issn      = {2155-7195},
  pages     = {4C3-1 -- 4C3-11},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{SchmitzDietzeCzarnecki2019,
  author    = {Schmitz, Manfred and Dietze, Christian and Czarnecki, Christian},
  title     = {Enabling digital transformation through robotic process automation at Deutsche Telekom},
  series = {Enabling digital transformation through robotic process automation at Deutsche Telekom},
  booktitle = {Enabling digital transformation through robotic process automation at Deutsche Telekom},
  editor    = {Urbach, Nils and R{\"o}glinger, Maximilian},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-319-95272-7},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-319-95273-4_2},
  pages     = {15 -- 33},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Due to the high number of customer contacts, fault clearances, installations, and product provisioning per year, the automation level of operational processes has a significant impact on financial results, quality, and customer experience. Therefore, the telecommunications operator Deutsche Telekom (DT) has defined a digital strategy with the objectives of zero complexity and zero complaint, one touch, agility in service, and disruptive thinking. In this context, Robotic Process Automation (RPA) was identified as an enabling technology to formulate and realize DT's digital strategy through automation of rule-based, routine, and predictable tasks in combination with structured and stable data.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchmittSchollCaietal.2010,
  author    = {Schmitt, Robert and Scholl, Ingrid and Cai, Yu and Xia, Ji and Dziwoki, Paul and Harding, Martin and Pavim, Alberto},
  title     = {Machine Vision System for Inline Inspection in Carbide Insert Production},
  series = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2010 : Algorithmen, Systeme, Anwendungen ; Proceedings des Workshops vom 14. bis 16. M{\"a}rz in Aachen / Thomas M. Deserno ... (Hrsg.)},
  journal   = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2010 : Algorithmen, Systeme, Anwendungen ; Proceedings des Workshops vom 14. bis 16. M{\"a}rz in Aachen / Thomas M. Deserno ... (Hrsg.)},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-642-11967-5},
  pages     = {339 -- 342},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{SchmiegelKochDittmeretal.2010,
  author    = {Schmiegel, A. and Koch, K. and Dittmer, M. and Braun, M. and Landau, M. and Dick, C. and Bragard, Michael and [u.a.],},
  title     = {Das Sol-ion System : ein System zur Optimierung des Eigenverbrauchs von PV-Strom},
  series = {Photovoltaische Solarenergie : 25. Symposium ; 03. - 05. M{\"a}rz 2010, Kloster Banz, Bad Staffelstein. - (Wissen f{\"u}r Profis)},
  booktitle = {Photovoltaische Solarenergie : 25. Symposium ; 03. - 05. M{\"a}rz 2010, Kloster Banz, Bad Staffelstein. - (Wissen f{\"u}r Profis)},
  publisher = {OTTI, Ostbayerisches Technologie-Transfer-Inst.},
  address   = {Regensburg},
  isbn      = {978-3-941785-23-6},
  pages     = {354 -- 359},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchmidtForkmannSchultzetal.2019,
  author    = {Schmidt, Katharina and Forkmann, Katarina and Schultz, Heidrun and Gratz, Marcel and Bitz, Andreas and Wiech, Katja and Bingel, Ulrike},
  title     = {Enhanced Neural Reinstatement for Evoked Facial Pain Compared With Evoked Hand Pain},
  series = {The Journal of Pain},
  journal   = {The Journal of Pain},
  number    = {In Press, Corrected Proof},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1526-5900},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jpain.2019.03.003},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchmidtForkmannSinkeetal.2016,
  author    = {Schmidt, K. and Forkmann, K. and Sinke, C. and Gratz, M. and Bitz, Andreas and Bingel, U.},
  title     = {The differential effect of trigeminal vs. peripheral pain stimulation on visual processing and memory encoding is influenced by pain-related fear},
  series = {NeuroImage},
  volume    = {134},
  journal   = {NeuroImage},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1053-8119},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.026},
  pages     = {386 -- 395},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Compared to peripheral pain, trigeminal pain elicits higher levels of fear, which is assumed to enhance the interruptive effects of pain on concomitant cognitive processes. In this fMRI study we examined the behavioral and neural effects of trigeminal (forehead) and peripheral (hand) pain on visual processing and memory encoding. Cerebral activity was measured in 23 healthy subjects performing a visual categorization task that was immediately followed by a surprise recognition task. During the categorization task subjects received concomitant noxious electrical stimulation on the forehead or hand. Our data show that fear ratings were significantly higher for trigeminal pain. Categorization and recognition performance did not differ between pictures that were presented with trigeminal and peripheral pain. However, object categorization in the presence of trigeminal pain was associated with stronger activity in task-relevant visual areas (lateral occipital complex, LOC), memory encoding areas (hippocampus and parahippocampus) and areas implicated in emotional processing (amygdala) compared to peripheral pain. Further, individual differences in neural activation between the trigeminal and the peripheral condition were positively related to differences in fear ratings between both conditions. Functional connectivity between amygdala and LOC was increased during trigeminal compared to peripheral painful stimulation. Fear-driven compensatory resource activation seems to be enhanced for trigeminal stimuli, presumably due to their exceptional biological relevance.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchlamannYoonMaderwaldetal.2010,
  author    = {Schlamann, Marc and Yoon, Min-Suk and Maderwald, Stefan and Pietrzyk, Thomas and Bitz, Andreas and Gerwig, Marcus and Forsting, Michael and Ladd, Susanne C. and Ladd, Mark E. and Kastrup, Oliver},
  title     = {Short term effects of magnetic resonance imaging on excitability of the motor cortex at 1.5T and 7T},
  series = {Academic Radiology},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Academic Radiology},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1076-6332},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.acra.2009.10.004},
  pages     = {277 -- 281},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Rationale and Objectives The increasing spread of high-field and ultra-high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners has encouraged new discussion of the safety aspects of MRI. Few studies have been published on possible cognitive effects of MRI examinations. The aim of this study was to examine whether changes are measurable after MRI examinations at 1.5 and 7 T by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Materials and Methods TMS was performed in 12 healthy, right-handed male volunteers. First the individual motor threshold was specified, and then the cortical silent period (SP) was measured. Subsequently, the volunteers were exposed to the 1.5-T MRI scanner for 63 minutes using standard sequences. The MRI examination was immediately followed by another TMS session. Fifteen minutes later, TMS was repeated. Four weeks later, the complete setting was repeated using a 7-T scanner. Control conditions included lying in the 1.5-T scanner for 63 minutes without scanning and lying in a separate room for 63 minutes. TMS was performed in the same way in each case. For statistical analysis, Wilcoxon's rank test was performed. Results Immediately after MRI exposure, the SP was highly significantly prolonged in all 12 subjects at 1.5 and 7 T. The motor threshold was significantly increased. Fifteen minutes after the examination, the measured value tended toward normal again. Control conditions revealed no significant differences. Conclusion MRI examinations lead to a transient and highly significant alteration in cortical excitability. This effect does not seem to depend on the strength of the static magnetic field.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchlamannVoigtMaderwaldetal.2010,
  author    = {Schlamann, Marc and Voigt, Melanie A. and Maderwald, Stefan and Bitz, Andreas and Kraff, Oliver and Ladd, Susanne C. and Ladd, Mark E. and Forsting, Michael and Wilhelm, Hans},
  title     = {Exposure to high-field MRI does not affect cognitive function},
  series = {Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging},
  volume    = {31},
  journal   = {Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1522-2586},
  doi       = {10.1002/jmri.22065},
  pages     = {1061 -- 1066},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Purpose To assess potential cognitive deficits under the influence of static magnetic fields at various field strengths some studies already exist. These studies were not focused on attention as the most vulnerable cognitive function. Additionally, mostly no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences were performed. Materials and Methods In all, 25 right-handed men were enrolled in this study. All subjects underwent one MRI examination of 63 minutes at 1.5 T and one at 7 T within an interval of 10 to 30 days. The order of the examinations was randomized. Subjects were referred to six standardized neuropsychological tests strictly focused on attention immediately before and after each MRI examination. Differences in neuropsychological variables between the timepoints before and after each MRI examination were assessed and P-values were calculated Results Only six subtests revealed significant differences between pre- and post-MRI. In these tests the subjects achieved better results in post-MRI testing than in pre-MRI testing (P = 0.013-0.032). The other tests revealed no significant results. Conclusion The improvement in post-MRI testing is only explicable as a result of learning effects. MRI examinations, even in ultrahigh-field scanners, do not seem to have any persisting influence on the attention networks of human cognition immediately after exposure.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchlamannYoonMaderwaldetal.2009,
  author    = {Schlamann, M. and Yoon, M.-S. and Maderwald, S. and Pietrzyk, T. and Bitz, Andreas and Gerwig, M. and Forsting, M. and Ladd, S. C. and Ladd, M. E. and Kastrup, O.},
  title     = {Auswirkungen der Magnetresonanztomografie auf die Elektrophysiologie des motorischen Kortex: eine Studie mit transkranieller Magnetstimulation},
  series = {R{\"o}Fo - Fortschritte auf dem Giebiet der R{\"o}ntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren},
  volume    = {181},
  journal   = {R{\"o}Fo - Fortschritte auf dem Giebiet der R{\"o}ntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {1438-9029},
  doi       = {10.1055/s-0028-1109038},
  pages     = {215 -- 219},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchifferFerreinLakemeyer2011,
  author    = {Schiffer, Stefan and Ferrein, Alexander and Lakemeyer, Gerhard},
  title     = {Reasoning with Qualitative Positional Information for Domestic Domains in the Situation Calculus},
  series = {Journal of Intelligent \& Robotic Systems},
  volume    = {63},
  journal   = {Journal of Intelligent \& Robotic Systems},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {0921-0296},
  pages     = {273 -- 300},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}