@inproceedings{Golland2019,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Datenschutzregulierung als Eingriff in Wertsch{\"o}pfungsmodelle},
  series = {Die Zukunft der Daten{\"o}konomie : zwischen Gesch{\"a}ftsmodell, Kollektivgut und Verbraucherschutz},
  booktitle = {Die Zukunft der Daten{\"o}konomie : zwischen Gesch{\"a}ftsmodell, Kollektivgut und Verbraucherschutz},
  editor    = {Ochs, Carsten and Friedewald, Michael and Hess, Thomas and Lamla, J{\"o}rn},
  publisher = {Springer Fachmedien},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-27510-5},
  pages     = {45 -- 68},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Das Kopplungsverbot verbietet, die Nutzung einer Dienstleistung von der Erteilung einer nicht f{\"u}r die Leistungserbringung erforderlichen Einwilligung abh{\"a}ngig zu machen. Personalisierte Werbung wird hierdurch erheblich erschwert. Anbieter k{\"o}nnen jedoch durch Bereitstellung eines alternativen, einwilligungsfreien Zugangs zu derselben Leistung ihren Dienst datenschutzkonform anbieten. Ein solcher Zugang muss nicht zwingend in Form eines fixen Entgelts gestaltet sein. Vielmehr ist es datenschutzrechtlich in gewissem Umfang zul{\"a}ssig, Preise unter Einbeziehung personenbezogener Daten dynamisch zu gestalten.},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{Golland2019,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Dynamic Pricing: Algorithmen zwischen {\"O}konomie und Datenschutz},
  series = {Die Macht der Daten und der Algorithmen - Regulierung von IT, IoT und KI},
  booktitle = {Die Macht der Daten und der Algorithmen - Regulierung von IT, IoT und KI},
  editor    = {Taeger, J{\"u}rgen},
  publisher = {OlWIR Verlag f{\"u}r Wirtschaft, Informatik und Recht},
  address   = {Edewecht},
  isbn      = {978-3-95599-061-9},
  pages     = {61 -- 75},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{FreyerThewesMeinecke2023,
  author    = {Freyer, Nils and Thewes, Dustin and Meinecke, Matthias},
  title     = {GUIDO: a hybrid approach to guideline discovery \& ordering from natural language texts},
  series = {Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Data Science, Technology and Applications DATA - Volume 1},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Data Science, Technology and Applications DATA - Volume 1},
  editor    = {Gusikhin, Oleg and Hammoudi, Slimane and Cuzzocrea, Alfredo},
  isbn      = {978-989-758-664-4},
  issn      = {2184-285X},
  doi       = {10.5220/0012084400003541},
  pages     = {335 -- 342},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Extracting workflow nets from textual descriptions can be used to simplify guidelines or formalize textual descriptions of formal processes like business processes and algorithms. The task of manually extracting processes, however, requires domain expertise and effort. While automatic process model extraction is desirable, annotating texts with formalized process models is expensive. Therefore, there are only a few machine-learning-based extraction approaches. Rule-based approaches, in turn, require domain specificity to work well and can rarely distinguish relevant and irrelevant information in textual descriptions. In this paper, we present GUIDO, a hybrid approach to the process model extraction task that first, classifies sentences regarding their relevance to the process model, using a BERT-based sentence classifier, and second, extracts a process model from the sentences classified as relevant, using dependency parsing. The presented approach achieves significantly better resul ts than a pure rule-based approach. GUIDO achieves an average behavioral similarity score of 0.93. Still, in comparison to purely machine-learning-based approaches, the annotation costs stay low.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKreinSteingroever2013,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus and Steingr{\"o}ver, Markus},
  title     = {Enhancing broadband development and internet usages for improving networks and services in APEC member economies: Bridging the digital divide},
  series = {The 19th ITS Biennial Conference 2012 "Moving Forward with Future Technologies: Opening a Platform for All" 18 - 21 November 2012, Thailand},
  booktitle = {The 19th ITS Biennial Conference 2012 "Moving Forward with Future Technologies: Opening a Platform for All" 18 - 21 November 2012, Thailand},
  publisher = {ITS},
  address   = {Bangkok},
  pages     = {13 S.},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKreinSteingroever2012,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus and Steingr{\"o}ver, Markus},
  title     = {Wholesale Broadband Access to IPTV in an NGA environment : how to deal with it from a regulatory perspective?},
  pages     = {1 -- 16},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKreinHaunert2008,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus and Haunert, Martina},
  title     = {Assessing the effectiveness of price cap regimes for the regulation of fixed telephony markets: has it been successful in achieving competition? : preliminary draft / by Markus Fredebeul-Krein and Martina Haunert. 19th European Regional ITS Conference of the International Telecommunications Society, September 17-19, 2008 Rome, Italy},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {1. Introduction 2. Tariff regulation, rebalancing and price caps 3. Price cap regimes in selected European countries 4. Has price cap regulation been successful? 5. Regulatory implications for other countries},
  subject      = {Telekommunikationsmarkt},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKrein2008,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus},
  title     = {Die Liberalisierung des deutschen Telekommunikationsmarktes: Vorbild f{\"u}r andere Sektoren? : Vortrag am Institut f{\"u}r Wirtschaftspolitik der Universit{\"a}t zu K{\"o}ln, 3. November 2008, K{\"o}ln},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Regulierung des deutschen Telekommunikationsmarktes Wettbewerb auf dem deutschen Telekommunikationsmarkt},
  subject      = {Telekommunikationsmarkt},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKrein2008,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus},
  title     = {Time for revision: The regulation of Germany's next generation networks in the light of new economic and technological challenges on telecom markets : Presentation for the 18th Biennial conference of the International Telecommunications Society, June 24-27, 2008 Montreal, Canada},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {On 1st January 1998, the German telecom market was fully liberalised. Since then genuine competition between market participants has developed, based on a comprehensive legal and regulatory framework that provides for safeguards against unfair competition and market power by Deutsche Telekom. Today, about 10 years after the liberalisation of the telecommunications sector a revision of this regulatory approach has become necessary because at least on three dimensions the situation is quite different from the one 10 years ago: First, with numerous established alternative operators in the market monopolies have been successfully challenged and competition introduced. Second, not only is Cable TV becoming in large parts of Germany a viable alternative for the provision of broadband services but also mobile services are becoming increasingly a substitute for fixed services. Last but not least there are important technological changes under way, requiring huge investments in infrastructure upgrades for next generation networks. In the light of these new developments the question is to which extent the current regulatory approach of severe ex-ante regulatory intervention is still appropriate. Is any part of the network of the former incumbent still a bottleneck? A more light handed regulatory approach might be the right response to this new situation. The paper is organised as follows: The first section will briefly examine the economic rationale for regulating network access. Based on the assumption that regulation is always necessary when bottlenecks exist regulatory principles for an efficient network access regime will be derived. The second section compares the situation of the German market in early 1998 with the one of today. Thereby three dimensions will be considered: the degree of competition, the potential for substitution and technological developments. The third section will define some requirements for the future regulation of telecom markets. Proposals will be elaborated how to ensure competitive telecom markets in the light of new economic and technological challenges.},
  subject      = {Telekommunikationsmarkt},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKrein2008,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus},
  title     = {Die globale Finanzkrise: Ursachen und Bew{\"a}ltigung : Vortrag an der Georg-Simon-Ohm-Schule K{\"o}ln, 2. Dezember 2008, K{\"o}ln},
  organization    = {FH Aachen, University of Applied Sciences},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {- Wie kam es zu der globalen Finanzkrise? - Wodurch zeichnet sich die Finanzkrise aus? - Wer hat die Finanzkrise verschuldet? - Welche Rolle spielten Spekulanten? - Inwiefern ist die Finanzkrise selbstverschuldet? - Ist die Globalisierung Schuld an den Finanzkrisen in zahlreichen Regionen dieser Welt? - Wie wirkt sich die Finanzkrise auf die Realwirtschaft aus? - Welche Wege bieten sich, aus der Krise herauszukommen?},
  subject      = {Finanzkrise},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{FredebeulKrein2006,
  author    = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus},
  title     = {Developing competitive broadband markets: Lessons learnt from German and European regulatory approaches on broad-band access},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {A key feature of future broadband markets will be diversity of access technologies, meaning that numerous technologies will be exploited for broadband communication. Various factors will affect the success of these future broadband markets, the regulatory policy being one amongst others. So far, a coherent regulatory approach does not exist as to broadband markets. First results of policies so far suggest that less sector-specific regulation is likely to occur. Instead, regulators must ensure that access to networks and services of potentially dominant providers in a relevant broadband market will satisfy requirements for openness and non-discrimination. In this environment the future challenge of regulationg broadband markets will be to set the right incentives for investment into new infrastructures. This paper examines whether there is a need for the regulation of future broadband access markets an if yes, what is the appropriate regulatory tool to do so. Thereby the focus is on the analysis of European broadband markets and the regulatory approaches applied. The first section provides a description of the characteristics of future broadband markets. The second section discusses possible bottlenecks on broadband markets an their regulatory implications. The third section will examine regulatory issues concerning access to broadband networks in more detail. This will be done by comparing the regulatory approaches of European countries and the results in terms of bradband penetration. The final section will give key recommendations for a regulatory strategy on brandband access markets.},
  subject      = {Telekommunikationsmarkt},
  language  = {en}
}