@book{Knueppel2007, author = {Kn{\"u}ppel, Mark}, title = {Bilanzierung von Verschmelzungen nach Handelsrecht, Steuerrecht und IFRS : Gemeinsamkeiten, Unterschiede und Grenzen der Konvergenz}, publisher = {E. Schmidt}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-503-10009-5}, pages = {XXVIII, 322 S. : graph. Darst.}, year = {2007}, language = {de} } @article{Knueppel2005, author = {Kn{\"u}ppel, Mark}, title = {Außerbilanzielle Korrekturen}, series = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver}, journal = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver}, publisher = {Haufe}, address = {Freiburg}, pages = {17-1 -- 17-67}, year = {2005}, language = {de} } @article{Knueppel2003, author = {Kn{\"u}ppel, Mark}, title = {Sonderbilanz und Status}, series = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver}, journal = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver}, publisher = {Haufe}, address = {Freiburg}, pages = {122-1 -- 122-53}, year = {2003}, language = {de} } @article{Knueppel2002, author = {Kn{\"u}ppel, Mark}, title = {Pro-Forma-Angaben}, series = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver}, journal = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung : das gesamte Wissen zur Rechnungslegung nach HGB, EStG und IFRS / Federmann, Rudolf ; Gnam, Arnulf ; Ammedick, Oliver}, publisher = {Haufe}, address = {Freiburg}, pages = {1950 -- 1952}, year = {2002}, language = {de} } @article{Knueppel2012, author = {Kn{\"u}ppel, Mark}, title = {Außerbilanzielle Korrekturen}, series = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung online}, journal = {Handbuch der Bilanzierung online}, editor = {Federmann, Rudolf and Kußmaul, Heinz and M{\"u}ller, Stefan}, publisher = {Haufe}, address = {Freiburg}, issn = {0172-0392}, pages = {Artikel HI 1380074}, year = {2012}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{KnackstedtEggertHeddieretal.2013, author = {Knackstedt, Ralf and Eggert, Mathias and Heddier, Marcel and Chasin, Friedrich and Becker, J{\"o}rg}, title = {The Relationship Of Is And Law - The Perspective Of And Implications For IS Research}, series = {ECIS 2013 Completed Research. 18}, booktitle = {ECIS 2013 Completed Research. 18}, pages = {13 S.}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{KnackstedtEggertHeddieretal.2013, author = {Knackstedt, Ralf and Eggert, Mathias and Heddier, Marcel and Chasin, Friedrich and Becker, J{\"o}rg}, title = {The Relationship of IS and Law - Insights into the German Online Car Registration Case}, series = {ECIS 2013 Completed Research. 18. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems}, booktitle = {ECIS 2013 Completed Research. 18. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems}, pages = {13 S.}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @article{KnackstedtEggertGraeweetal.2010, author = {Knackstedt, Ralf and Eggert, Mathias and Gr{\"a}we, Lena and Spittka, Jan}, title = {Forschungsportal f{\"u}r Rechtsinformatik und Informationsrecht - Weg zu einer disziplinen{\"u}bergreifenden Forschungs{\"u}bersicht}, series = {MMR - Multimedia und Recht}, journal = {MMR - Multimedia und Recht}, number = {8}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {1434-596X}, pages = {528 -- 533}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Die Entwicklungen der Rechtsinformatik und des Informationsrechts zeigen, dass diese Disziplinen aktuell vor der Herausforderung stehen, eine interdisziplin{\"a}re Zusammenarbeit zwischen ihnen und anderen Disziplinen zu etablieren. Unterschiedliche Publikationskulturen erschweren die Erreichung dieses Ziels. Forschungsportale stellen themenspezifische, internetbasierte Verzeichnisse dar, die bereits vorhandene Informationen strukturiert zug{\"a}nglich machen. Sie k{\"o}nnen die Beziehungen zwischen den Disziplinen f{\"o}rdern, indem sie bereits erzielte Arbeitsergebnisse disziplinen{\"u}bergreifend bekannt machen und dadurch dazu beitragen, Synergiepotenziale und m{\"o}gliche Kooperationspartner zu identifizieren.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{KnackstedtEggertFleischer2012, author = {Knackstedt, Ralf and Eggert, Mathias and Fleischer, Stefan}, title = {The Legal Perspective on Business to Government Reporting - A Conceptual Modeling Approach and Its Application in the Financial Sector}, series = {45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2012}, booktitle = {45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2012}, isbn = {978-0-7695-4525-7}, doi = {10.1109/HICSS.2012.576}, pages = {2309 -- 2318}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @article{KlettkeHomburgGell2015, author = {Klettke, Tanja and Homburg, Carsten and Gell, Sebastian}, title = {How to measure analyst forecast effort}, series = {European Accounting Review}, volume = {24}, journal = {European Accounting Review}, number = {1}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, address = {London}, issn = {0963-8180}, doi = {10.1080/09638180.2014.909291}, pages = {129 -- 146}, year = {2015}, abstract = {We introduce a new way to measure the forecast effort that analysts devote to their earnings forecasts by measuring the analyst's general effort for all covered firms. While the commonly applied effort measure is based on analyst behaviour for one firm, our measure considers analyst behaviour for all covered firms. Our general effort measure captures additional information about analyst effort and thus can identify accurate forecasts. We emphasise the importance of investigating analyst behaviour in a larger context and argue that analysts who generally devote substantial forecast effort are also likely to devote substantial effort to a specific firm, even if this effort might not be captured by a firm-specific measure. Empirical results reveal that analysts who devote higher general forecast effort issue more accurate forecasts. Additional investigations show that analysts' career prospects improve with higher general forecast effort. Our measure improves on existing methods as it has higher explanatory power regarding differences in forecast accuracy than the commonly applied effort measure. Additionally, it can address research questions that cannot be examined with a firm-specific measure. It provides a simple but comprehensive way to identify accurate analysts.}, language = {en} }