@incollection{SchulteZurhausen2016,
  author    = {Schulte-Zurhausen, Manfred},
  title     = {Systemisches Management von Organisationsprojekten},
  series = {Projekte systemisch managen! Wie Sie soziale und rationale Prozesse in Projekten achtsam steuern},
  booktitle = {Projekte systemisch managen! Wie Sie soziale und rationale Prozesse in Projekten achtsam steuern},
  editor    = {Stelzer-Rothe, Thomas},
  publisher = {BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-8305-3647-5},
  pages     = {9 -- 34},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Olbertz2016,
  author    = {Olbertz, Klaus},
  title     = {Tarifentgelterh{\"o}hungen auf Grund betrieblicher {\"U}bung},
  series = {Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht : GWR},
  journal   = {Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht : GWR},
  issn      = {1868-1816},
  pages     = {217 -- 217},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{FunkeKeinzBoerneretal.2016,
  author    = {Funke, Harald and Keinz, Jan and B{\"o}rner, S. and Hendrick, P. and Elsing, R.},
  title     = {Testing and analysis of the impact on engine cycle parameters and control system modifications using hydrogen or methane as fuel in an industrial gas turbine},
  series = {Progress in propulsion physics ; Volume 8},
  booktitle = {Progress in propulsion physics ; Volume 8},
  publisher = {EDP Sciences},
  address   = {o.O.},
  organization    = {European Conference for Aerospace Sciences <2013, M{\"u}nchen>},
  isbn      = {978-5-94588-191-4},
  doi       = {10.1051/eucass/201608409},
  pages     = {409 -- 426},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KnobeGiesenPlateetal.2016,
  author    = {Knobe, M. and Giesen, M. and Plate, S. and Gradl-Dietsch, G. and Buecking, B. and Eschbach, D. and Laack, Walter van and Pape, H.-C.},
  title     = {The Aachen mobility and balance index to measure physiological falls risk: a comparison with the Tinetti POMA scale},
  series = {European Journal Of Trauma And Emergency Surgery},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {European Journal Of Trauma And Emergency Surgery},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1863-9941},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00068-016-0693-2},
  pages     = {537 -- 545},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Purpose The most commonly used mobility assessments for screening risk of falls among older adults are rating scales such as the Tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment (POMA). However, its correlation with falls is not always predictable and disadvantages of the scale include difficulty to assess many of the items on a 3-point scale and poor specificity. The purpose of this study was to describe the ability of the new Aachen Mobility and Balance Index (AMBI) to discriminate between subjects with a fall history and subjects without such events in comparison to the Tinetti POMA Scale. Methods For this prospective cohort study, 24 participants in the study group and 10 in the control group were selected from a population of patients in our hospital who had met the stringent inclusion criteria. Both groups completed the Tinetti POMA Scale (gait and balance component) and the AMBI (tandem stance, tandem walk, ten-meter-walk-test, sit-to-stand with five repetitions, 360° turns, timed-up-and-go-test and measurement of the dominant hand grip strength). A history of falls and hospitalization in the past year were evaluated retrospectively. The relationships among the mobility tests were examined with Bland-Altmananalysis. Receiver-operated characteristics curves, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results The study showed a strong negative correlation between the AMBI (17 points max., highest fall risk) and Tinetti POMA Scale (28 points max., lowest fall risk; r = -0.78, p < 0.001) with an excellent discrimination between community-dwelling older people and a younger control group. However, there were no differences in any of the mobility and balance measurements between participants with and without a fall history with equal characteristics in test comparison (AMBI vs. Tinetti POMA Scale: AUC 0.570 vs. 0.598; p = 0.762). The Tinetti POMA Scale (cut-off <20 points) showed a sensitivity of 0.45 and a specificity of 0.69, the AMBI a sensitivity of 0.64 and a specificity of 0.46 (cut-off >5 points). Conclusion The AMBI comprises mobility and balance tasks with increasing difficulty as well as a measurement of the dominant hand-grip strength. Its ability to identify fallers was comparable to the Tinetti POMA Scale. However, both measurement sets showed shortcomings in discrimination between fallers and non-fallers based on a self-reported retrospective falls-status.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{HoevelerJanser2016,
  author    = {Hoeveler, Bastian and Janser, Frank},
  title     = {The aerodynamically optimized design of a fan-in-wing duct},
  series = {Applied Aerodynamics Research Conference 2016, Bristol, GB, Jul 19-21, 2016},
  booktitle = {Applied Aerodynamics Research Conference 2016, Bristol, GB, Jul 19-21, 2016},
  isbn      = {1-85768-371-4},
  pages     = {1 -- 10},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{NiemuellerReuterEwertetal.2016,
  author    = {Niemueller, Tim and Reuter, Sebastian and Ewert, Daniel and Ferrein, Alexander and Jeschke, Sabina and Lakemeyer, Gerhard},
  title     = {The Carologistics Approach to Cope with the Increased Complexity and New Challenges of the RoboCup Logistics League 2015},
  series = {RoboCup 2015: Robot World Cup XIX},
  booktitle = {RoboCup 2015: Robot World Cup XIX},
  editor    = {Almeida, Luis},
  publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-319-29339-4},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-319-29339-4_4},
  pages     = {47 -- 59},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{BarnatBosse2016,
  author    = {Barnat, Miriam and Bosse, Elke},
  title     = {The challenge of creating meta-inferences: Combining data representing institutional and individual perspectives on first-year support in higher education},
  series = {9th Conference on Social Science Methodology of the International Sociological Association, Leicester, UK},
  booktitle = {9th Conference on Social Science Methodology of the International Sociological Association, Leicester, UK},
  pages     = {1 -- 20},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchmidtForkmannSinkeetal.2016,
  author    = {Schmidt, K. and Forkmann, K. and Sinke, C. and Gratz, M. and Bitz, Andreas and Bingel, U.},
  title     = {The differential effect of trigeminal vs. peripheral pain stimulation on visual processing and memory encoding is influenced by pain-related fear},
  series = {NeuroImage},
  volume    = {134},
  journal   = {NeuroImage},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1053-8119},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.026},
  pages     = {386 -- 395},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Compared to peripheral pain, trigeminal pain elicits higher levels of fear, which is assumed to enhance the interruptive effects of pain on concomitant cognitive processes. In this fMRI study we examined the behavioral and neural effects of trigeminal (forehead) and peripheral (hand) pain on visual processing and memory encoding. Cerebral activity was measured in 23 healthy subjects performing a visual categorization task that was immediately followed by a surprise recognition task. During the categorization task subjects received concomitant noxious electrical stimulation on the forehead or hand. Our data show that fear ratings were significantly higher for trigeminal pain. Categorization and recognition performance did not differ between pictures that were presented with trigeminal and peripheral pain. However, object categorization in the presence of trigeminal pain was associated with stronger activity in task-relevant visual areas (lateral occipital complex, LOC), memory encoding areas (hippocampus and parahippocampus) and areas implicated in emotional processing (amygdala) compared to peripheral pain. Further, individual differences in neural activation between the trigeminal and the peripheral condition were positively related to differences in fear ratings between both conditions. Functional connectivity between amygdala and LOC was increased during trigeminal compared to peripheral painful stimulation. Fear-driven compensatory resource activation seems to be enhanced for trigeminal stimuli, presumably due to their exceptional biological relevance.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FerreinSteinbauer2016,
  author    = {Ferrein, Alexander and Steinbauer, Gerald},
  title     = {The Interplay of Aldebaran and RoboCup},
  series = {KI - K{\"u}nstliche Intelligenz},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {KI - K{\"u}nstliche Intelligenz},
  number    = {3-4},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1610-1987},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13218-016-0440-1},
  pages     = {325 -- 326},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{WuKemper2016,
  author    = {Wu, Ziyi and Kemper, Hans},
  title     = {The optimal 48 V - battery pack for a specific load profile of a heavy duty vehicle},
  series = {8. Internationale Fachtagung Kraftwerk Batterie : 26. - 27. April 2016, M{\"u}nster, Deutschland},
  booktitle = {8. Internationale Fachtagung Kraftwerk Batterie : 26. - 27. April 2016, M{\"u}nster, Deutschland},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}