@inproceedings{Wessling2006,
  author    = {Weßling, Matthias},
  title     = {Como motivar a si mesmo e aos outros - o valor dos 16 Motivos Vitais para Lideran{\c{c}}a},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {O Perfil Reiss apresenta no resultado uma vis{\~a}o da estrutura dos motivos e impulsos de uma pessoa. O ponto de sa{\´i}da para a an{\´a}lise do resultado {\´e} o conhecimento de que os motivos vitais (= valores e metas de sobreviv{\^e}ncia) formam a moldura, na qual as compet{\^e}ncias e capacidades que uma pessoa possui possam se desabrochar de forma ideal. A partir desse princ{\´i}pio, n{\~a}o existe no Perfil Reiss nenhum resultado que se possa classificar como correto ou falso, nem como bom ou mau. Uma compara{\c{c}}{\~a}o entre o resultado do Perfil Reiss e o conte{\´u}do de uma atividade apresentada ou ambicionada d{\´a} informa{\c{c}}{\~a}o sobre at{\´e} que ponto a capacidade de rendimento de uma pessoa nessa posi{\c{c}}{\~a}o pode vir ou vir{\´a} a se desenvolver por um longo tempo.},
  subject      = {F{\"u}hrung},
  language  = {es}
}
@inproceedings{FleischhakerGebsBudnickietal.2013,
  author    = {Fleischhaker, Robert and Gebs, Raphael and Budnicki, Aleksander and Wolf, M. and Kleinbauer, Jochen and Sutter, Dirk H.},
  title     = {Compact gigawatt-class sub-picosecond Yb:YAG thin-disk regenerative chirped-pulse amplifier with high average power at up to 800 kHz},
  series = {Lasers and electro-optics europe (CLEO EUROPE/IQEC) : International quantum electronics conference : 12 - 16 May 2013, Munich, GE.},
  booktitle = {Lasers and electro-optics europe (CLEO EUROPE/IQEC) : International quantum electronics conference : 12 - 16 May 2013, Munich, GE.},
  publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
  isbn      = {978-1-4799-0593-5},
  doi       = {10.1109/CLEOE-IQEC.2013.6801054},
  pages     = {1},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FingerBraunBil2020,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Comparative assessment of parallel-hybrid-electric propulsion systems for four different aircraft},
  series = {AIAA SciTech Forum 2020, 06.01.2020 - 10.01.2020, Orlando},
  booktitle = {AIAA SciTech Forum 2020, 06.01.2020 - 10.01.2020, Orlando},
  doi       = {10.2514/6.2020-1502},
  pages     = {15 Seiten},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{Finger2016,
  author    = {Finger, Felix},
  title     = {Comparative Performance and Benefit Assessment of VTOL and CTOL UAVs},
  series = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress (DLRK) 2016, 13.-15.9.2016},
  booktitle = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress (DLRK) 2016, 13.-15.9.2016},
  pages     = {10 Seiten},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{BergmannGoettenBraunetal.2022,
  author    = {Bergmann, Ole and G{\"o}tten, Falk and Braun, Carsten and Janser, Frank},
  title     = {Comparison and evaluation of blade element methods against RANS simulations and test data},
  series = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  volume    = {13},
  booktitle = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wien},
  issn      = {1869-5590 (Online)},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13272-022-00579-1},
  pages     = {535 -- 557},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This paper compares several blade element theory (BET) method-based propeller simulation tools, including an evaluation against static propeller ground tests and high-fidelity Reynolds-Average Navier Stokes (RANS) simulations. Two proprietary propeller geometries for paraglider applications are analysed in static and flight conditions. The RANS simulations are validated with the static test data and used as a reference for comparing the BET in flight conditions. The comparison includes the analysis of varying 2D aerodynamic airfoil parameters and different induced velocity calculation methods. The evaluation of the BET propeller simulation tools shows the strength of the BET tools compared to RANS simulations. The RANS simulations underpredict static experimental data within 10\% relative error, while appropriate BET tools overpredict the RANS results by 15-20\% relative error. A variation in 2D aerodynamic data depicts the need for highly accurate 2D data for accurate BET results. The nonlinear BET coupled with XFOIL for the 2D aerodynamic data matches best with RANS in static operation and flight conditions. The novel BET tool PropCODE combines both approaches and offers further correction models for highly accurate static and flight condition results.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{OertelBung2013,
  author    = {Oertel, Mario and Bung, Daniel B.},
  title     = {Comparison of 2D dam-break waves with VOF and SPH method},
  series = {Proceedings of the 35th IAHR world congress : 8.-13.9.2013, Chengdu, China},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 35th IAHR world congress : 8.-13.9.2013, Chengdu, China},
  publisher = {Tsinghua Univ. Press},
  address   = {Beijing},
  organization    = {International Association for Hydraulic Engineering and Research},
  pages     = {Artikelkennnummer: A11113},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{TakenagaWernerSawadaetal.2012,
  author    = {Takenaga, Shoko and Werner, Frederik and Sawada, Kazuaki and Sch{\"o}ning, Michael Josef},
  title     = {Comparison of label-free ACh image sensors based on CCD and LAPS},
  isbn      = {978-3-9813484-2-2},
  doi       = {10.5162/IMCS2012/4.2.6},
  pages     = {356 -- 359},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{LeiseSimonAltherr2020,
  author    = {Leise, Philipp and Simon, Nicolai and Altherr, Lena},
  title     = {Comparison of Piecewise Linearization Techniques to Model Electric Motor Efficiency Maps: A Computational Study},
  series = {Operations Research Proceedings 2019},
  booktitle = {Operations Research Proceedings 2019},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-030-48439-2},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-030-48439-2_55},
  pages     = {457 -- 463},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {To maximize the travel distances of battery electric vehicles such as cars or buses for a given amount of stored energy, their powertrains are optimized energetically. One key part within optimization models for electric powertrains is the efficiency map of the electric motor. The underlying function is usually highly nonlinear and nonconvex and leads to major challenges within a global optimization process. To enable faster solution times, one possibility is the usage of piecewise linearization techniques to approximate the nonlinear efficiency map with linear constraints. Therefore, we evaluate the influence of different piecewise linearization modeling techniques on the overall solution process and compare the solution time and accuracy for methods with and without explicitly used binary variables.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{LatzkeAlexopoulosKronhardtetal.2015,
  author    = {Latzke, Markus and Alexopoulos, Spiros and Kronhardt, Valentina and Rend{\´o}n, Carlos and Sattler, Johannes, Christoph},
  title     = {Comparison of Potential Sites in China for Erecting a Hybrid Solar Tower Power Plant with Air Receiver},
  series = {Energy Procedia},
  booktitle = {Energy Procedia},
  issn      = {1876-6102},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.142},
  pages     = {1327 -- 1334},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{AlexopoulosHoffschmidtRau2011,
  author    = {Alexopoulos, Spiros and Hoffschmidt, Bernhard and Rau, Christoph},
  title     = {Comparison of steady-state and transient simulations for solar tower power plants with open-volumetric receiver},
  series = {SolarPACES 2011 : concentrating solar power and chemical energy systems : 20 - 23 September, 2011, Granada, Spain},
  booktitle = {SolarPACES 2011 : concentrating solar power and chemical energy systems : 20 - 23 September, 2011, Granada, Spain},
  address   = {Granada},
  pages     = {1 CD-ROM},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}