@article{SmithKotliarLammertynetal.2020,
  author    = {Smith, Wayne and Kotliar, Konstantin and Lammertyn, Leandi and Ramoshaba, Nthai E. and Vilser, Walthard and Huisman, Hugo W. and Schutte, Aletta E.},
  title     = {Retinal vessel caliber and caliber responses in true normotensive black and white adults: The African-PREDICT study},
  series = {Microvascular Research},
  volume    = {128},
  journal   = {Microvascular Research},
  number    = {Article 103937},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0026-2862},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.mvr.2019.103937},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose Globally, a detrimental shift in cardiovascular disease risk factors and a higher mortality level are reported in some black populations. The retinal microvasculature provides early insight into the pathogenesis of systemic vascular diseases, but it is unclear whether retinal vessel calibers and acute retinal vessel functional responses differ between young healthy black and white adults. Methods We included 112 black and 143 white healthy normotensive adults (20-30 years). Retinal vessel calibers (central retinal artery and vein equivalent (CRAE and CRVE)) were calculated from retinal images and vessel caliber responses to flicker light induced provocation (FLIP) were determined. Additionally, ambulatory blood pressure (BP), anthropometry and blood samples were collected. Results The groups displayed similar 24 h BP profiles and anthropometry (all p > .24). Black participants demonstrated a smaller CRAE (158 ± 11 vs. 164 ± 11 MU, p < .001) compared to the white group, whereas CRVE was similar (p = .57). In response to FLIP, artery maximal dilation was greater in the black vs. white group (5.6 ± 2.1 vs. 3.3 ± 1.8\%; p < .001). Conclusions Already at a young age, healthy black adults showed narrower retinal arteries relative to the white population. Follow-up studies are underway to show if this will be related to increased risk for hypertension development. The reason for the larger vessel dilation responses to FLIP in the black population is unclear and warrants further investigation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SattlerRoegerSchwarzboezletal.2020,
  author    = {Sattler, Johannes Christoph and R{\"o}ger, Marc and Schwarzb{\"o}zl, Peter and Buck, Reiner and Macke, Ansgar and Raeder, Christian and G{\"o}ttsche, Joachim},
  title     = {Review of heliostat calibration and tracking control methods},
  series = {Solar Energy},
  volume    = {207},
  journal   = {Solar Energy},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.030},
  pages     = {110 -- 132},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Large scale central receiver systems typically deploy between thousands to more than a hundred thousand heliostats. During solar operation, each heliostat is aligned individually in such a way that the overall surface normal bisects the angle between the sun's position and the aim point coordinate on the receiver. Due to various tracking error sources, achieving accurate alignment ≤1 mrad for all the heliostats with respect to the aim points on the receiver without a calibration system can be regarded as unrealistic. Therefore, a calibration system is necessary not only to improve the aiming accuracy for achieving desired flux distributions but also to reduce or eliminate spillage. An overview of current larger-scale central receiver systems (CRS), tracking error sources and the basic requirements of an ideal calibration system is presented. Leading up to the main topic, a description of general and specific terms on the topics heliostat calibration and tracking control clarifies the terminology used in this work. Various figures illustrate the signal flows along various typical components as well as the corresponding monitoring or measuring devices that indicate or measure along the signal (or effect) chain. The numerous calibration systems are described in detail and classified in groups. Two tables allow the juxtaposition of the calibration methods for a better comparison. In an assessment, the advantages and disadvantages of individual calibration methods are presented.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Golland2020,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Auernhammer - DSGVO/BDSG, Kommentar (7. Auflage, 2020)},
  series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  number    = {10},
  publisher = {DFV Mediengruppe},
  address   = {Frankfurt a.M.},
  issn      = {0170-7256},
  pages     = {260},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Golland2020,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Gabel/Heinrich/Kiefner - Rechtshandbuch Cyber-Security (2019)},
  series = {K\&R Kommunikation \& Recht},
  journal   = {K\&R Kommunikation \& Recht},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {1434-6354},
  pages     = {VII},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Golland2020,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Hansen-Oest - Datenschutzbeauftragte (2020)},
  series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {DFV Mediengruppe},
  address   = {Frankfurt a.M.},
  issn      = {0170-7256},
  pages     = {228},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Golland2020,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Kipker - Rechtshandbuch Cybersecurity (2020)},
  series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  number    = {7-8},
  publisher = {DFV Mediengruppe},
  address   = {Frankfurt a.M.},
  issn      = {0170-7256},
  pages     = {192},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Golland2020,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Spiecker gen. D{\"o}hmann/Bretthauer - Dokumentation zum Datenschutz (2019)},
  series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {DFV Mediengruppe},
  address   = {Frankfurt a.M.},
  issn      = {0170-7256},
  pages     = {52 -- 52},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Golland2020,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Sydow - Bundesdatenschutzgesetz, Handkommentar (2020)},
  series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {DFV Mediengruppe},
  address   = {Frankfurt a.M.},
  issn      = {0170-7256},
  pages     = {76 -- 76},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ValeroChansonBung2020,
  author    = {Valero, Daniel and Chanson, Hubert and Bung, Daniel Bernhard},
  title     = {Robust estimators for free surface turbulence characterization: A stepped spillway application},
  series = {Flow Measurement and Instrumentation},
  volume    = {76},
  journal   = {Flow Measurement and Instrumentation},
  number    = {Art. 101809},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0955-5986},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101809},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Robust estimators are parameters insensitive to the presence of outliers. However, they presume the shape of the variables' probability density function. This study exemplifies the sensitivity of turbulent quantities to the use of classic and robust estimators and the presence of outliers in turbulent flow depth time series. A wide range of turbulence quantities was analysed based upon a stepped spillway case study, using flow depths sampled with Acoustic Displacement Meters as the flow variable of interest. The studied parameters include: the expected free surface level, the expected fluctuation intensity, the depth skewness, the autocorrelation timescales, the vertical velocity fluctuation intensity, the perturbations celerity and the one-dimensional free surface turbulence spectrum. Three levels of filtering were utilised prior to applying classic and robust estimators, showing that comparable robustness can be obtained either using classic estimators together with an intermediate filtering technique or using robust estimators instead, without any filtering technique.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Gaigall2020,
  author    = {Gaigall, Daniel},
  title     = {Rothman-Woodroofe symmetry test statistic revisited},
  series = {Computational Statistics \& Data Analysis},
  volume    = {2020},
  journal   = {Computational Statistics \& Data Analysis},
  number    = {142},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0167-9473},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.csda.2019.106837},
  pages     = {Artikel 106837},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The Rothman-Woodroofe symmetry test statistic is revisited on the basis of independent but not necessarily identically distributed random variables. The distribution-freeness if the underlying distributions are all symmetric and continuous is obtained. The results are applied for testing symmetry in a meta-analysis random effects model. The consistency of the procedure is discussed in this situation as well. A comparison with an alternative proposal from the literature is conducted via simulations. Real data are analyzed to demonstrate how the new approach works in practice.},
  language  = {en}
}