@inproceedings{HippeFingerGoettenetal.2020,
  author    = {Hippe, Jonas and Finger, Felix and G{\"o}tten, Falk and Braun, Carsten},
  title     = {Propulsion System Qualification of a 25 kg VTOL-UAV: Hover Performance of Single and Coaxial Rotors and Wind-Tunnel Experiments on Cruise Propellers},
  series = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2020},
  booktitle = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2020},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GoettenHavermannBraunetal.2018,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Gomez, Francisco and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {On the Applicability of Empirical Drag Estimation Methods for Unmanned Air Vehicle Design Read More: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2018-3192},
  series = {2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum},
  booktitle = {2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum},
  issn      = {1533-385X},
  doi       = {10.2514/6.2018-3192},
  pages     = {Article 3192},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FingerGoettenBraunetal.2019,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and G{\"o}tten, Falk and Braun, Carsten and Bil, C.},
  title     = {On Aircraft Design Under the Consideration of Hybrid-Electric Propulsion Systems},
  series = {APISAT 2018: The Proceedings of the 2018 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2018)},
  booktitle = {APISAT 2018: The Proceedings of the 2018 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2018)},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Singapore},
  isbn      = {978-981-13-3305-7},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-981-13-3305-7_99},
  pages     = {1261 -- 1272},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {A hybrid-electric propulsion system combines the advantages of fuel-based systems and battery powered systems and offers new design freedom. To take full advantage of this technology, aircraft designers must be aware of its key differences, compared to conventional, carbon-fuel based, propulsion systems. This paper gives an overview of the challenges and potential benefits associated with the design of aircraft that use hybrid-electric propulsion systems. It offers an introduction of the most popular hybrid-electric propulsion architectures and critically assess them against the conventional and fully electric propulsion configurations. The effects on operational aspects and design aspects are covered. Special consideration is given to the application of hybrid-electric propulsion technology to both unmanned and vertical take-off and landing aircraft. The authors conclude that electric propulsion technology has the potential to revolutionize aircraft design. However, new and innovative methods must be researched, to realize the full benefit of the technology.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FingerGoettenBraunetal.2019,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and G{\"o}tten, Falk and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Mass, Primary Energy, and Cost - The Impact of Optimization Objectives on the Initial Sizing of Hybrid-Electric General Aviation Aircraft},
  series = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2019, DLRK 2019. Darmstadt, Germany},
  booktitle = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2019, DLRK 2019. Darmstadt, Germany},
  doi       = {10.25967/490012},
  pages     = {1 -- 17},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FingerGoettenBraun2018,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and G{\"o}tten, Falk and Braun, Carsten},
  title     = {Initial Sizing for a Family of Hybrid-Electric VTOL General Aviation Aircraft},
  series = {67. Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2018},
  booktitle = {67. Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2018},
  pages     = {14 S.},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GoettenFingerHavermannetal.2020,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Finger, Felix and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Marino, Matthew and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Full Configuration Drag Estimation of Small-to-Medium Range UAVs and its Impact on Initial Sizing Optimization},
  series = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2020},
  booktitle = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2020},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GoettenFingerBraunetal.2019,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Finger, Felix and Braun, Carsten and Havermann, Marc and Bil, C. and Gomez, F.},
  title     = {Empirical Correlations for Geometry Build-Up of Fixed Wing Unmanned Air Vehicles},
  series = {APISAT 2018: The Proceedings of the 2018 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2018)},
  booktitle = {APISAT 2018: The Proceedings of the 2018 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2018)},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Singapore},
  isbn      = {978-981-13-3305-7},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-981-13-3305-7_109},
  pages     = {1365 -- 1381},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The results of a statistical investigation of 42 fixed-wing, small to medium sized (20 kg-1000 kg) reconnaissance unmanned air vehicles (UAVs) are presented. Regression analyses are used to identify correlations of the most relevant geometry dimensions with the UAV's maximum take-off mass. The findings allow an empirical based geometry-build up for a complete unmanned aircraft by referring to its take-off mass only. This provides a bridge between very early design stages (initial sizing) and the later determination of shapes and dimensions. The correlations might be integrated into a UAV sizing environment and allow designers to implement more sophisticated drag and weight estimation methods in this process. Additional information on correlation factors for a rough drag estimation methodology indicate how this technique can significantly enhance the accuracy of early design iterations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FingerGoettenBraunetal.2019,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and G{\"o}tten, Falk and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Cost Estimation Methods for Hybrid-Electric General Aviation Aircraft},
  series = {Asia Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology. APISAT 2019},
  booktitle = {Asia Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology. APISAT 2019},
  pages     = {1 -- 13},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GoettenFinger2019,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Finger, Felix},
  title     = {Conceptual Design of a Modular 150 kg Vertical Take-off and Landing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle},
  series = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2019. Darmstadt, Germany},
  booktitle = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2019. Darmstadt, Germany},
  pages     = {1 -- 10},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{BergmannGoettenBraunetal.2022,
  author    = {Bergmann, Ole and G{\"o}tten, Falk and Braun, Carsten and Janser, Frank},
  title     = {Comparison and evaluation of blade element methods against RANS simulations and test data},
  series = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  volume    = {13},
  booktitle = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wien},
  issn      = {1869-5590 (Online)},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13272-022-00579-1},
  pages     = {535 -- 557},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This paper compares several blade element theory (BET) method-based propeller simulation tools, including an evaluation against static propeller ground tests and high-fidelity Reynolds-Average Navier Stokes (RANS) simulations. Two proprietary propeller geometries for paraglider applications are analysed in static and flight conditions. The RANS simulations are validated with the static test data and used as a reference for comparing the BET in flight conditions. The comparison includes the analysis of varying 2D aerodynamic airfoil parameters and different induced velocity calculation methods. The evaluation of the BET propeller simulation tools shows the strength of the BET tools compared to RANS simulations. The RANS simulations underpredict static experimental data within 10\% relative error, while appropriate BET tools overpredict the RANS results by 15-20\% relative error. A variation in 2D aerodynamic data depicts the need for highly accurate 2D data for accurate BET results. The nonlinear BET coupled with XFOIL for the 2D aerodynamic data matches best with RANS in static operation and flight conditions. The novel BET tool PropCODE combines both approaches and offers further correction models for highly accurate static and flight condition results.},
  language  = {en}
}